The AP already has declared Mike Huckabee the winner.
If true, this can mean only one thing: Iowa sucks.
UPDATE: I don't know who he's been talking to, but Glenn Reynolds says that Fox has also declared for Huck.
If true, this can mean only one thing: Even Fox News knows that Iowa sucks.
I won't vote for Huck. Can't. I'd rather not vote at all.
Can't we have another party? Something other than the moonbat left and religious right? Please?
Geeze, now I know how the Dems must have felt when Kerry won last year. Who on earth is voting for Huckabee?
Wake me up when NH restores order to the known universe. Thank you!
Iowa picks corn, New Hampshire picks its nose. I've lived in cities with more people than either of those places.
The Iowa caucus is as effective at picking presidents as the inept and asinine Iowa straw poll, which is to say - NOT!
but I have to hand it to the buckeyes, they have certainly figured out a way to get dollars out of out of towners every 4 years.
( oh dear lord, I sound like Fred Thompson...)
but I have to hand it to the buckeyes..."
I'm from Ohio, so I'll assume you meant to rip on the hawkeyes.
And your thoughts on your Ron Paul prediction?
Ick. Ohio, don't talk to me about Ohio. Ioway is bad enough.
Don't worry bout Huck, he will not be the nominee and he knows it, why shouldn't he enjoy his 15 min? Skip ahead and consider either what concessions he gets for his support, or where when and how the dead girl or live boy will be found in his bed.
Selah. It is written. Nobody named Huckabee may be elected President - don't believe me? Read the Constitution, right after "No Homers" and before "No people with two first names" - which sadly excludes Tommy John but happily ensures no chief-hailing for Ron Paul.