VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Be Careful What You Wish For
Posted by Stephen Green  ·  26 November 2007

Glenn Reynolds links approvingly to this report on North Korea:

Intelligence sources and other observers both here in the capital of the PRC and elsewhere in Asia are stating that they project a possible collapse of the North Korean regime within six months time.

Although there have been similar dire predictions made in the past, those analyzing the current situation point to several factors that indicate that the regime may finally be unraveling.

The Weekly Standard claims that Kim Jong-Il Is hiding setting aside gobs of cash money for his exile retirement. If the regime collapses in a hurry--a Romanian-style coup, Kim will be lucky to escape the country with his life. It all sounds too good to be true--and it is.

Here's what I had to say about this exact same issue four years ago:

South Korea has fewer than 50 million people, and while they've made great strides, their per capita income is still only up to that of modern Poland. They aren't poor, but they aren't nearly as rich as West Germany was [in 1990, when they absorbed 17 million relatively rich and well-fed East Germans]. In addition, their {South Korean] economy isn't as mature or robust, as the Asian Financial Crisis of a couple years back showed.

Up north are 22 million of their starving brethren. Before the Communist dictatorship, they lived a brutal existence as virtual slaves of Japan. "Chosen," as Tokyo called Korea, was annexed by the Japanese Empire 93 years ago. It's safe to say that there is no one in North Korea with any experience living in a politically modern, free, democratic, or tolerant state. Travel is forbidden. Only a small handful of South Koreans are allowed north. There is only one radio station, and it runs nothing but the foulest sort of propaganda. And according to a story in US News & World Report a few weeks ago, North Korea even has concentration camps bigger than the District of Columbia.

Through no fault of their own, the people of North Korea simply aren't ready to enter the modern world, and South Korea can't afford to feed, house, re-educate, and re-civilize them all.

I don't know if I buy this six month timeframe idea--Pyongyang has looked like a dead regime walking since Old Man Kim got himself entombed back in '94. But no matter how you slice it, the liberation of 22 million people would be a wonderful thing. The disappearance of a hereditary communist gangster state wouldn't exactly suck, either. But the aftermath is going to be bloody and messy--and might require the involvement of Beijing to a degree not seen in Korea since 1951, when the PLA crossed the Yalu River en masse.

Sleep tight!



A few other things to think about.

Can China afford to watch after a few million refugees? I think the answer is yes, but don't expect the Chinese to be very hospitable, much less lavish.

The US Army in South Korea is now based away from the DMZ, much further south than it once was. That's good news--you don't want American troops maybe having to enforce possible (unlikely, but possible) South Korean orders to shoot at North Koreans fleeing towards Seoul. The bad news is, somebody has got to secure North Korea's WMDs, and it's likely to be a race between the US Army and the PLA. And I wonder if we have any idea where to look.

Also, we'll be hamstrung by refugees in ways the Chinese won't allow themselves to become.

North Koreans are, thanks to 50-plus years of especially-inept communism, shorter, dumber, less educated and more paranoid than their southern brethren. Northerners and Southerners are, in effect, no longer one people. Who's to say Seoul will want to reunify any time soon? In that case, what becomes of North Korea, and who is going to run the place? Would it become a UN, US, or Chinese protectorate? A new dictatorship to replace the old one? Anarchy?

I'm just thinking out loud here, on the logistics of a rapid and thorough North Korean collapse--and my head is spinning. I hope Washington and the Pentagon have given all these questions a lot more thought than I have.

Comments

North Korea will stay in place until the day that China decides that its time to go. And China craves stability over all other things. China has its eyes focused on the coming Olympics, which is their arrival in the big tim. With that in mind, lets take a look at a few things:

First, China has geography in their favor. Now kids, pull out your magical 'google earth' toolset and take a virtual ride along that northern border that North Korea shares with China and Russia. You'll quickly see that theres only a handful of bridges that cross the Yalu and those mountains will naturally contain ( or funnel) the refugees into controllable 'chokepoints'.

Second, China has simple survival economics in its favor. It takes about 1500 calories of food per day to travel 25 miles by foot on level ground, that number goes up dramatically in uneven terrain and in colder climes. Just to get that 1500 calories into something you can more easily imagine, thats something roughly the size and weight of your average decorative brick. So, you need one brick for every 25 miles you want to travel, for each person you want to move with. The material logistics of something like that adds up pretty fast, but the total miles for any migration start to work against you. For the moment, we will ignore the water and sanitation problems that come with mass migrations of humans, but keep that in the back of your minds. For one example take the case of Cholera. Cholera is a far off legendary disease in the minds of the modern human because it is so rarely seen, but in the past with our own 'western migration' in the United States, cholera killed far more people than indian warfare or rapacious 'Donner parties' ever did. Cholera spreads because of bad sanitation and its spreads fast. You get it by breakfast, youre doubled over by dinner and dead the next day and your death helps spread the disease.

What it means is that a sort of evacuation pyramid will arise the minute that the very top of the pyramid is either removed or goes into exile. Those with the most means will go first( the small end of the pyramid) and as each of those layers of the pyramid begin to move so as to protect their natural inclination for personal security, and society and its controls break down, each lower layer will also begin to move to secure its own level of its 'hierarchy of needs'. The "masses" that remain - those at the lower ends of the pyramid,will because of these "survival economics" will be largely be unable to move anywhere fast without direct outside aid, and its my guess that aid will not be coming, because while it is our reflex to do so - to do so is to guarantee that they will move and no one wants that to happen.

For people living without the benefit of a nomadic lifestyle and culture, moving from the city to the country 'en masse' means you're will probably be dead within a week. Most of the North Koreans will know this to be true, and will likely remain right where they are until help arrives from the outside world and by that I mean China.

So, one part of North Korea will move real fast but thats the real small part so they will not be noticed. The big middle part will break down into two groups, one that moves and dies and the others who have been preparing for the big day with contraband goods and stolen supplies. The ones that are already in prison camps or at the bottom of a very structured society will stay right where they are because they are where they are already because they have no support system to fall back on.

China, will step in and re-establish governmental order through a local puppet government that will be in place within 72 hours of our noticing that the Kim family has gone into exile.

In summary - I expect that it will come quick, and I expect that it is probably underway to some degree and that the Chinese have long been preparing and exercising their military for this day to come. Keep an eye on Chinese activity in the Shandong penninsula just across from North Korea.

China can ill afford to have this country implode while they have the world coming over with all their cameras during the olympics. My guess is that they would rather have this particular 'stain in the rug' removed before company arrives.

Posted by: Frank Martin at November 26, 2007 06:38 PM

There's no real reason to think that South Korea would allow China to control the northern half of the country. The emotional element of reuniting their people can't be so easily discounted. And they really despise China.

Posted by: Skyler at November 26, 2007 07:20 PM

TO: Stephen Green, et al.
RE: The Chicom's Rabid Lapdog

I doubt if the Chinese Communists will allow Kim to collapse. They need him for the sake of plausible deniability.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 26, 2007 07:25 PM

Allow China? You mean like theres a damn thing they could do about it if thats what ends up happening? You think the South Koreans are going to slug it out militarily with China? Nah. They will stomp their feet and get angry, but in the end theres not a damn thing they can do but sit and watch.

Posted by: Frank Martin at November 26, 2007 07:28 PM

Well, if China invades, that's a whole different ball game, isn't it? Operation Team Spirit and whatever else they call it now would no longer be an operation, it would be a war and we'd be in it too.

But absent a military invasion, South Korea will take the lead in resurrecting their kin.

Posted by: Skyler at November 26, 2007 08:09 PM

Not to sound crass, but I suspect the nukes are really all that matter to us (USA)at this point.

We’ll grab them, or maybe buy them before hand (either outright, with the cash going to Kimmy, or quid pro quo), or worst case, seal them in.

And we’ll probably help SOKO do whatever they want to do. Treaties and allies and trading partners and all that

I suspect the poor NOKO folks will be on their own, at least for a few years.

For precedent, see Darfur, or just about any non-strategic portion of Africa.

Posted by: jaymaster at November 26, 2007 08:12 PM

Does it really matter whether we grab the nukes, or let China grab them?

Posted by: sammler at November 27, 2007 02:49 AM

I was just thinking that sammler. Who cares who grabs the nukes provided they are grabbed by a stable government? They don't work and there's no new technology in them.

Posted by: tim maguire at November 27, 2007 09:04 AM

I would think getting our hands on at least some of the DPRK's fissile material might come in handy someday--like for fingerprinting Syrian or al Qaeda nukes.

Helpful, should the terrible need arise.

Posted by: Stephen Green at November 27, 2007 09:23 AM

Stephen,

Bingo. Originally, it made no sense to me that NOKO was included in the “Axis of Evil”. Now, I think I understand why.

Posted by: jaymaster at November 27, 2007 10:18 AM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"A top blogger, even if he doesn’t spell his first name properly."
-Steven Taylor

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori