I know it's unwise to trust the New York Times, but I still (mostly, kind of) trust them to do basic arithmetic. So this can't be good:
Two of the leading Republican presidential candidates spent more than they raised this summer, according to campaign finance reports filed yesterday, in another sign of the fund-raising difficulties the party faces as it seeks to hold on to the White House.
It gets worse:
Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, raised $9.5 million in contributions over the summer but spent more than twice that, $21.3 million.
Mr. Romney, a wealthy businessman, lent his campaign $8.5 million over the summer, and even with that large loan, which helped pay for a big television ad campaign, his expenses still outpaced his receipts. His campaign reported that it had $9.2 million in the bank that could be used for the primary elections.
Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, raised more money than any other Republican this summer — $11.6 million — but he also spent more than he raised, burning through $13.3 million without running a single television commercial
If these guys are running as fiscal conservatives -- and they are -- then they aren't exactly setting a good example. Then again, if they're running against any of our recent Congresses, then they still look pretty swell in comparison.
Rudolph W.? Who wrote this column, Rudy's mom in a bad mood?
This was amusing to come across. Thanks! Pesonally, I'm for Fred Thompson. So I find it funny that they all ragged on Fred for starting late when in reality they all started too soon and as you have pointed out...IN DEBT BEFORE IT HAS GOTTEN ANYWHERE! Thanks for the humor.
Are you actually giving a backhanded compliment to Fred?