VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Debate Drunkblogging -- LIVE!
Posted by Stephen Green  ·   9 October 2007

1:59pm (All times Mountain, most likely): Just waiting for CNBC to start their broadcast. But I've got my first martini half in me already. And please try not to refresh this page more than every two or three minutes. I can't post much faster than that, and my server can't handle much more than that. Be kind to us both.

2:01pm Today's debate focuses on the economy, but what everyone will really be watching is Fred Thompson's debate debut, and on Ron Paul's newly-fat wallet.

2:03pm Thompson says we're not heading towards recession, but he gave no actual numbers, and he froze up halfway through on the R word. Then he segued in (along with a covering cough) into some generalities about overspending. Followup question: But people THINK we're going into recession, you idiot! (I've paraphrased) What will you do??? HUH?

The moderator just saved Fred's bacon, by sounding more like a b-tch than he sounded out of his depth.

2:05pm Compare and contrast with Mitt Romney, who sounds smoother than a smoothie smoothed over with fine-grit sandpaper.

2:07pm Chris Matthews got in a question, delivered to Rudy Giuliani -- who sounds quite patient (and pretty honest), explaining to Matthews that the President doesn't actually control or predict the economy. So far, Mitt and Rudy have made me forget Fred.

2:09pm Ron Paul takes a simple question about the time, and explains how to build a watch. He's going on about inflation -- at near-record lows -- and how it's the real inflation causing the recession poor people are already in, and how the gold standard will save us, and Masonites are running the Federal Reserve with their zombie pirate enforcers. Or something.

2:11pm When McCain talks health care for the elderly, he reminds me that he's, well, one of the elderly. He looks tired. Bravo to McCain for supporting the SCHIP veto, and attacking the tax code.

2:13pm Huckabee got in the first laugh -- "Nothing's gonna stop [Americans] from spending money." Who showed him my Amex statement?

2:15pm Duncan Hunter claims that 1.8 million jobs have moved to China. And he's tying that in to IEDs, somehow, and the decline of the US steel industry. Has he forgotten we make more steel than ever, but with fewer people -- freeing them up to do cooler stuff than smelt iron?

2:17pm Good on Fred T for coming back swinging in defense of free trade, although he did throw in the unnecessary "and fair" modifier. Still, it was a solid response, and put him on my meter for the first time today.

2:19pm Sam Brownbaspack doesn't want to raise your taxes. That's a brave stand to take at a Republican debate. Next, he'll do a cameo in the Sex & The City movie, and come out in favor of strappy sandals.

2:21pm Tom Tancredo is the most honest guy up there right now, when it comes to spending. "Earmarks," he says "aren't even the problem." It's the mandatory spending that's killing us. And he's right. "You must look at Social Security and Medicare." The sound you hear is applause from me, combined with the "whooosh" of his campaign going down the toilet. Sad.

2:23pm Rudy claims he cut taxes 23 times as NYC mayor. Can anyone tell me how many (if any) fees he raised? I know Bill Richardson got caught in that trap, so I'm curious.

2:24pm Romney tells us that the tax burden was lower in MA while he was governor, than it was in NYC while Rudy was mayor. Rudy shoots back with NYC spending went down 17%, and went up in MA 11%. Who has the real numbers? Meanwhile, they're catfighting over the constitutionality of the line-item veto.

What's missing? Any involvement at all from the third frontrunner, Fred Thompson.

2:25pm "I don't think it's a bad idea to have a Republican candidate who has actually beaten President Clinton at something." Rudy, giving a funny (and possibly chilling) one-liner. Fred T tried to get in a line, but failed.

2:27pm Next question goes to Thompson, and it's about job creation. His answer is a lot like his campaign -- it's aimless and general.

2:28pm It's the Cold War II! Duncan Hunter can't say "China." It's "Communist China," just in case we forgot.

2:29pm McCain has got to stop talking about health care. It really, really makes him look old. And if you're staring at a computer screen and hear him more than you see him, then he sounds even older.

2:30pm While Tancredo is ranting, I'll say something general. Chris Matthews is on his best behavior tonight. No rants, no spittle, fair questions. Anybody want to start a pool on how long before that changes? I'll put five bucks on "spittle," no later than 3:05pm.

2:32pm Romney is fielding yet another question. How much of his great big fortune got spent tonight on CNBC? And to amend something I said earlier, he's smoother than a smoothie smoothed over with fine-grit sandpaper, then sent out for further smoothing to Kruger Industrial Smoothing.

2:34pm I'm curious what Rudy means by "improving free trade agreements." A trade deal either has restrictions -- and isn't free -- or it doesn't have restrictions -- and it free. Or did I miss something?

2:36pm We're more than a quarter the way through Fred Thompson's debutante debate, and he's been a wallflower all night long. His dance card has hardly any names on it. What we're really seeing today is the Mitt & Rudy Show. Maybe things will change after the first commercial break, when -- if I may switch metaphors -- Fred's corner man has to slap him awake.

2:38pm Thompson has tied in the Dubai's big NASDAQ buy with "protecting our infrastructure." Duncan wouldn't sell American assets to Dubai at all. If not here, where does he want all those petrodollars to go?

2:39pm It occurs to me that five million dollars is not enough to win Ron Paul much attention from CNBC.

2:42pm Finally, a question about the AMT! Fred T says, "we shouldn't confuse the wealth of government with the wealth of the nation." In other words, ditch the AMT (or maybe bracket for inflation), and let people keep their money. Amen, brother. And his delivery was the best he's done so far.

First commercial break. Time for second martini. Back after these unimportant messages.

2:47pm "All things considered, was the Bush policy in Iraq a good one?" Fred answers that we went in with too few troops and too little planning, but the surge seems to be working. That's all conventional wisdom. If he doesn't sound fired up on the big issue, then when will he?

2:49pm McCain says that, had he been President on 9/11, he would have not said "Go shopping!" Instead, he'd have asked Americans to volunteer. I would have walked across broken martini glasses to vote against McCain in 2000. Was I wrong?

2:51pm Non-English speakers can tell when Paul is talking about Iraq, because his voice goes up two full octaves. Also, he accused us of having an "empire." And that our overseas "adventures" are bankrupting us. And yet -- we're still spending less on defense than we were in the '50s or '60s. And we're not exactly imposing our will, ala Rome. Don't let this man near foreign policy. Or a history class. Please.

2:53pm Huckabee is going to get together this weekend with Joe Biden to talk about Iraq. That could be fun.

2:54pm Fred sounds good talking about Iran and Osirik back in '81. Although to be fair-but-cruel, I think the Osirik airstrike is the first hard specific he's mentioned in the whole first hour of the debate.

2:56pm Mitt sounds strong -- not just smooth -- talking about Iran and nukes. I think the background noise was the steam leaking out of Paul's ears, Tex Avery-style.

2:57pm "AAAA-AAAA-AAAAbsolutely!" Ron Paul's first reply when asked if the President needed permission from Congress to attack a fleeting, strategic target in Iran. He's pointing and screeching and he found a third higher octave. He makes me sad I used to be a card-carrying Libertarian. Less for what he said, than how.

2:59pm Most everyone else is tackling this question. And while responses vary, the other candidates at least sound sane. From all across the country, there are college students wearing "I Grok Spock" t-shirts, wondering if Paul will give them their fifty dollars back.

3:01pm Matthews mentions that Hillary is sponsoring legislation requiring the permission asked about at 2:57pm. Rudy ties it back to 9/11 -- his signature move -- and how a quick strike in Afghanistan in 2000 or so might have prevented 9/11. Paul tried to interrupt, but failed. His voice was so high this time, that my dog went nuts and wet on the carpet. I get the feeling this happens more than the Paul campaign lets on.

3:02pm Rudy makes sense on energy independence, and how it we could turn Iran into "a paper tiger." What he fails to mention is, we're not going to get there from here. Also, Rudy sidestepped the follow-up question about drilling off the California coast. You know what? Cali is going to vote Democrat next year, so screw'em. Drill, baby, drill!

3:04pm Brownback can't tell the difference between a hybrid at E85 fuel. Oops. Now the enviros will never vote Republican.

3:05 Hunter: "You'd better drill every place you can." Translation: "What VodkaPundit said about California."

3:07pm Meanwhile, McCain tries to take both sides and "wouldn't drill of the coast of [California/Florida/etc]" unless the people of those states gave permission. Fat chance.

3:09pm Loaded question for Brownback: "Shouldn't we let the free market determine what happens with ethanol?" And the entire state of Iowa held its breath.

3:11pm Same question to Thompson, who claims that "ultimately it'll be the free market [to decide]." And this man has actually spent time in Washington? Did he learn nothing while he was there?

3:13pm Mitt Romney is talking oil, but he could be talking Iran, Iraq, earmarks, pig knuckle subsidies, hairdressers... he just always sounds the same. I don't think I could deal with that for four years.

3:15pm Ron Paul wants to cut all subsidies, and Lord knows he's right. But all I could think was, "Will somebody please tell him to spend some of his five million on a suit coat that actually fits?"

3:16pm How do you bring confidence back to the economy? Mitt: "First, be confident." Great answer, delivered like a Stepford Wife answering "Yes" to... anything.

3:17pm It's still the Mitt & Rudy Show. On today's episode, Rudy is taking on Hillary like they're both already the nominees. And it works every time he does it. It's the domestic version of his 9/11 judo.

3:18pm Hunter is trying to sell himself as a Reagan Republican, but when he talks trade, he sounds like Dick Gephardt, circa 1988.

3:20pm Tancredo: "Standing on principle is a wonderful thing. Too bad we didn't do it when we were in the majority." There's the best line of the night, bar none.

3:20.5pm Second commercial break, third martini. Can I keep up this pace? Can I hear a hallelujah?

3:24pm To Fred: "Give specific steps" to fixing Social Security. "We're eating our seed corn, we're spending their money, we're giving 110%, we'll take one for the team, and also Mom, Uncle Pie, and Sam apples." Also, maybe we'll index for inflation. When asked for specifics, Thompson reached, once more, into his grab bag of homespun generalities. ["grab bag of homespun generalities?" -Ed. I'm drunk, OK?]

3:26pm Tancredo: Free trade agreements are too long, and let foreigners into our country which is bad for national security. It was his Ron Paul Moment.

3:28pm Now Mitt is taking on Hillary, thus returning us to the Mitt & Rudy Show. On the next episode, Mitt & Rudy agree: That woman is crazy and mean!

3:28.5pm Andrea Shea King asks, "Barack who?" I laughed out loud.

3:30pm If this debate were being held anywhere but Michigan, would any of these candidates be spending so much time sucking up to unions? (Ohio and Indiana excepted.)

3:32pm "I have been a union member. The Screen Actors Guild still counts, right?" Fred's first gag of the debate! And it was nearly funny!

3:34pm We're still talking unions. And if I may quote Evil Willow: "Bored now. Can I play with the puppy?"

3:35pm "Leave my mother out of this." -Mike Huckabee or Brownback or somebody. Idea for the next debate: Snaps!

3:37pm I don't know if something went wrong with the sound system, causing McCain to miss a question, but whatever happened, he looked deaf. And therefore old. And I'm not at all surprised anymore that he raised less money last quarter than Paul did.

3:39pm Thompson finally sounded strong, answering a question on how to help US automakers. His answer: Get trade agreements that let them compete, and relieve them of their health care burdens. The first part I understand. The second part made me think of HillaryCare.

3:41pm "If this situation becomes worse..." then Rudy would increase policing of the internet. Short on specifics, long on scary, scary threats. Rudy's instincts are just wrong, wrong, wrong when it comes to the internet. Strangely enough, it was Old Man McCain who came to the defense of our cool, new technologies.

Third commercial, still on the third martini. But at 3.5 ounces each, can you blame me?

3:45pm Mike Huckabee on the SCHIP veto: "It was about posturing," and, to paraphrase, "the Democrats beat us on the politics." Sharp and honest -- Mike loses again.

3:47pm Romney has a chance -- right the hell now! -- to tie in a question about Muslim Americans, with his own minority beliefs. And... he flubbed it. He spoke in generalities, sidestepping the fact that he's LDS and knows a thing or two about being in the minority. He could have made a real moment here, but played it safe.

3:48pm One of those Huckabee/Brownback guys reached into his memory, but couldn't pull out the name "Greenspan." Now there's a major flub.

3:49pm Again, McCain looked deaf, missing a question. What's up with that? Is it McCain or the sound system?

3:50pm Ron Paul says he won't promise to support his party's candidate next fall. Why doesn't he just declare himself a Libertarian (again) and get it over with? I'll tell you why: Because as the one anti-war Republican candidate, he gets a lot more attention than he would as just another nutty Libertarian.

3:52pm "Is London going to replace New York as the financial capital of the world?" Asked of Rudy? Talk about a softball question -- and yet the gal asking it made it sound like she was throwing him major heat. Well, Rudy basically gave her the New Yorker Single Finger Salute.

3:54pm Mitt got the same question, but gave an answer including subsections of Sarbanes-Oxley. Given the chance to step out of the Stepford mold, Mitt flubbed it again.

3:56pm "Hey, Fred, who is the Prime Minister of Canada?" Can someone please tell me who this idiot woman is on the panel? And why she thinks she's so tough? She's making Matthews look good, which is like making Quasimodo look like Cary Grant.

3:58pm "McCain, how would you catch bin Laden?" What, he's supposed to be Rambo? Mark 3:56 as the time when this debate got just plain stupid. I think everybody is tired, especially the panel.

3:59pm Matthews: "Would a third party option be good?" Again -- what kind of question is that? Good for whom? I think what happened was, the debate went fast than anyone thought, and now the panel has reached deep into the bullpen for more questions.

4:00pm Thompson jokes, "I think these debates were getting a little boring without me."

If only that were true, Senator. If only that were true.

I'm done, but I'll have a wrap-up later at Pajamas Media. Watch for it.

Comments

You what this debate has made me forget? Why in hell we're having debates for conventions almost a year away.

Posted by: physics geek at October 9, 2007 02:10 PM

Are we hearing the sound of Fred! deflating? Is it first-game jitters, or is he really that pathetic at debates?

Posted by: NukemHill at October 9, 2007 02:29 PM

Enjoying your running commentary. You've got Free Republic and Townhall beat. I'm ready for a martini...

A.

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:26 PM

Barack who???

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:28 PM

Martini on the keyboard at your Mitt as a Stepford wife analogy. That's why I think it's going to be Rudy in the end.

Posted by: Theresa at October 9, 2007 03:34 PM

They've mentioned "The Constitution" a couple of times, but no one has asked the essential question: "Where in the Constitution does it say the Federal govt has the authority to create and fund the social(ist) programs we're debating about?

I'd have to seriously consider giving my vote to the candidate who points out that the primary function of the 18 enumerated powers the feds are responsible for is to secure and defend our country.

Not holding my breath, though. Pouring another one instead...

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:40 PM

This is the best live blogging of any debate I've ever read, anywhere.

Posted by: alle at October 9, 2007 03:41 PM

See, there's where I agree with Paul. He's a principled libertarian on domestic issues. Problem is, he's a principled libertarian on foreign policy, too.

That, and he's bat-shite crazy.

Cheers!

Posted by: Stephen Green at October 9, 2007 03:43 PM

Huckabee sounding good... very likeable too. Despite the "hick-ey" name.

(Could anything have been stranger than "Bush"?)

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:45 PM


Duncan Hunter is a straight up guy -- very accessible too. Have had him on my radio program three times -- dependable.

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:51 PM

Romney -- good one!

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:53 PM

Grading the candidates and declaring the winner...

Ron Paul - W (for whacked)
Mike Huckabee - A
John McCain - B-
Duncan Hunter - A
Mitt Romney - B-
Rudy Giuliani - B+
Fred Thompson - C+ "Just like home"
Sam Brownback - B- "Hey, that's my mother!"
Tom Tancredo - B

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 03:59 PM

Switching over to Brit -- thanks for the live commentary -- this was fun.

Time to refresh my cocktail.

Posted by: Andrea Shea King at October 9, 2007 04:01 PM

Man, why waste martinis on this? I'm sucking on a Colt 45 40 and weeping.

Posted by: Jazzbo at October 9, 2007 04:06 PM

One thing that really mystified me about the debate was when Paul said there had been no “imminent” attack on the USA in 233 years.

Guiliani quite rightly responded by mentioning 9/11 and Paul dismissively stated it wasn’t the work of a nation, just 19-men, which is a huge stretch to say the least and Guiliani properly batted him down for that…

… but have both men forgotten about Japan and Pearl Harbor?

Posted by: Christoph at October 9, 2007 04:51 PM

2:51pm Non-English speakers can tell when Paul is talking about Iraq, because his voice goes up two full octaves. Also, he accused us of having an "empire." And that our overseas "adventures" are bankrupting us. And yet -- we're still spending less on defense than we were in the '50s or '60s. And we're not exactly imposing our will, ala Rome. Don't let this man near foreign policy. Or a history class. Please.

and

3:50pm Ron Paul says he won't promise to support his party's candidate next fall. Why doesn't he just declare himself a Libertarian (again) and get it over with? I'll tell you why: Because as the one anti-war Republican candidate, he gets a lot more attention than he would as just another nutty Libertarian.

You really want the Evil Truther Paulite Hordes to come and be all self-righteous and defensive, don't you?

For the record, I have a theory about Paul's big money. See, a lot of Republicans like me are sitting back and waiting to see who can earn their donations. The Paulites have their candidate and they are passionate about him--they are dedicated to getting him as much notice as possible. The big GOP candidates don't have a lot of passionate support, but I think they'll have a lot of pragmatic support when the election gets closer. I just wonder if that's a recipe for winning the presidency.

Anyway, that doesn't make them powerful and it doesn't make his take very impressive to me: it just lets us know what he can do at his best. We've got his high water mark right now--I doubt that it will get better from here.

When the other guys start dropping out, money will start flowing to the consensus candidates. Tancredo and Huckabee supporters aren't going to throw in with the Truthers when those two leave the race; they're, in the main, going to start giving their money to Thompson, Romney, or Rudy. Possibly McCain, although you have to wonder how long he'll stay in with his sinking numbers.

Damn, I ramble on, don't I? Sorry about that.

Posted by: zombyboy at October 9, 2007 05:04 PM

Question for you guys:

Gin or Vodka? Tanguay and M&R Vermouth here.....

Josh

Posted by: Josh at October 9, 2007 05:35 PM

I'm on my second 40 ouncer, but the tears have slowed. Gimme a second chance.

Posted by: Jazzbo at October 9, 2007 05:43 PM

Another ex-card-carrying-Libertarian. Woo hoo.

I remember a Lib fundraiser calling me about a month after 9/11 and I made smoke come out of his ears.

They haven't called back since. The party must have shrunk 40% in that month.

I've got a few of them on a Ron Paul thread and the guy thought we beat the Barbary jihadis in 1801-03 (Jefferson) with Letters of Marque and privateers.

Then I pulled up some quotes from the wiki (from the wiki damn it!!!!) and he went quiet.

So then he goes all "no declaration of war" on me and I pulled up another wiki (from the wiki damn it!!!!) about the War on the Barbary jihadis. More silence. Then I pulled up the actual AUMF and compared it with Jefferson's Congress AUMF from the wiki (from the wiki damn it!!!!) and he hasn't been back since.

Libs live in Libertopia. The land that never was or will be. Like the Socialists looking for the New Socialist Man the Libs are looking for New Libertarian Man. I hope they find him and marry him.

Posted by: M. Simon at October 9, 2007 08:27 PM

Let's not forget also that America's western foreign policy was explicitly imperialistic -- using our excess farmers, and their desire for cheap, new lands -- to push our western border to the Mississippi and beyond.

And Jefferson wanted to add Canada, Mexico, and Cuba to America's lands. *Jefferson*.

Posted by: Stephen Green at October 9, 2007 08:34 PM

Vodka,

You should have smoked another martini.

I was hoping for a snappier reply. :-)

Posted by: M. Simon at October 9, 2007 09:17 PM

Just curious. How do you guys think this War on Terrorist will conclude?

Do you guys see an end to it? It seems to me that the more countries we invade, the more moderates will turn into extremists. Does it end with the killing of all arabs?


Posted by: wbbgjr at October 9, 2007 10:20 PM

As I wrote three years ago...

"Before 9/11, we almost always knew how to win a war – even the people who weren't in favor of fighting it...

"...Nobody ever knows what the peace will look like...

"...What will the peace look like? I don't have a damn clue. And neither do you. And if you meet anyone who claims to know, feel free to laugh at them really hard. So hard, you get a little spit on their face. Sometimes, justice can be small and spiteful – ask a meter maid. Anyway.

When peace comes, it could look like whatever Mecca, Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh, Pyongyang, Khartoum, Kabul, Cairo, etc., look like after being hit by big city-busting nuclear warheads. Or it could end with the entire Arab and Muslim world looking like the really well-manicured bits of Connecticut. My best guess is, somewhere in-between. But that's only a guess."

What I do know is, we - and Western Civilization - can't afford to lose. Because as ugly as this war is (sometimes unnecessarily so), giving into jihadism would be uglier still.

Posted by: Stephen Green at October 9, 2007 10:29 PM

Vodka,

I gave you some link love at:

http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2007/10/from_the_wiki_d.html

http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2007/10/the_new_imperia.html

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/10/from-wiki-damn-it.html

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2007/10/new-imperialism.html

Thanks for the help!

Posted by: M. Simon at October 9, 2007 11:25 PM

Great debate drunkblogging! Better than being there. Thanks!

Does it end with the killing of all arabs?

It's just this kind of racist profiling that has to stop. Not all Arabs are terrorists, not all terrorists are Arabs. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: klrtz1 at October 10, 2007 01:26 AM

The fact that Romney is anointed with the media mantle of front-runner is the best evidence yet that some kind of real campaign finance reform is needed. The man is the perfect stuffed suit to complement Paul's tinfoil hat, and there were at least half a dozen people on stage better qualified to be president. More, if interns came up to refill water glasses.

Posted by: Nathan Hall at October 10, 2007 03:28 AM

A trade deal either has restrictions -- and isn't free -- or it doesn't have restrictions -- and it free. Or did I miss something?

It's not Rudy's fault for being unclear on that, Stephen. Politicians just have a bad habit of naming a thing something they'd like you to think it is, even if it's totally not. It's tough when it's speech, but you have to pay attention to the capitalization. When politicians say "Free Trade Agreement" they mean something totally different than what you or I mean when we say "free-trade agreement".

None of our Free Trade Agreements actually give us free trade with anyone. NAFTA's the closest to free trade we have and it's just a ridiculous snarl of exceptions and subclauses. The US, Mexican, and Canadian governments still tinker with all kinds of susidies, tariffs, and whatnot.

Posted by: SeanH at October 10, 2007 06:23 AM

I'm a Rudy guy. He did well. But Stephen, while I respect your opinion, it's clear you're drunk if you think Fred did less than "well" too tonight.

Posted by: Rocketeer at October 10, 2007 06:36 AM

I can understand why you think that Ron Paul is "bat-shit crazy." He has announced that he won't take a government pension. What a loon!

The other folks on the stage, who you praise, on the other hand, will always do the "sane" thing. They'll pocket the tax money every time and/or failing that will earn their lobbying fee by going on record to restore a thug like Aristide power.

Yeah, Ron Paul is the only crazy guy up there. That's the ticket.

Posted by: Wright at October 10, 2007 10:05 AM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"...the ideal substance of style combo."
-Virginia Postrel

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori