Sweet mother of god...

What Mikey said.

I believe Hewitt's apt quote about Clinton is rather fitting: Perhaps not the worst President we've ever had, but certainly the worst man ever to be President.

When in the military, serving your country, you're the most vunerable to your leaders.

This is one of the reasons why Bush is so popular among the troops and Clinton wasn't.

Oh my god. I can't believe how no matter how little my opinion of Clinton and Berger is, they manage to completely blow it out of the water and sink lower and lower and lower.

I hate to say it, but this doesn't surprise me at all. In fact, my guess is had W lost to Gore in 2000, we would have found some tidy way of making a few bombing runs in Afghanistan and then "moving on" afer 9/11 too.

That's not what scares me about the thought of Gore winning in 2000. It's that the "few bombing runs" in Afghanistan really and truely would have been motivated by vengence rather than considered necessity.

When something is seen as a last resort only, or something to be avoided at all costs, it will still be used but when "war never *solves* anything" it is going to be used with that mindset and expectation. Without the anticipation of a good result can a good result even be possible?

If this was such a problem, why didn't the current president fix it.

He's kinda busy with their neighbor, Matt.

Someone explain to Matt the difference between moving the goalposts and lowering the bar. He seems confused.

And screw Berger. Why isn't Clinton in jail?

Keep in mind, guys, Hillary had to be in the loop on this...

He's kinda busy with their neighbor, Matt.

Neighbors. Plural.

Between Afghanistan, Iraq, and shutting down the Pakistani proliferation bazzar, I'd say Mr Clinton's successor has had his hands full.

IMO, one of the more important reasons to vote against the Democrat in 2008 is because the Democratic administratio's national security/foreign policy staff is going to be drawn from people who served during the Clinton administration.

This serves as a healthy reminder that not all fools and traitors work at the New York Times.

Matt,
Read the whole article. You'll find that W did do something about it. A hell of a lot more than that raggedy ass predecesor of his did:

"The Khobar bombing case eventually led to indictments in 2001, thanks to the personal leadership of President George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice. But justice has been a long time coming. Only so much can be done, after all, with arrest warrants and judicial process. Bin Laden and his two separate pre-9/11 arrest warrants are a case in point."

I say, no more discussion in regards to Iran... Let the bombs fall where they may!

Ya know, I can forgive mistakes, misperceptions, and even failure.

It's not even trying that really drives me nuts.

Pretty soon, not necessarily within the next decade, but soon enough, former President Clinton is going to look into the mirror as an old man. I, for one, think that he is going to detest the man looking back at him. With the kind of clarity that can only be experienced when dealing with one's mortality, the level of disgust he is going to feel will be crushing.

I know that the comment could be made that with someone as narcissistic and neurotic as Clinton, it won't happen. That he'll look in that mirror and think he's still the man, that he'll keep fooling himself.

Perhaps.

But in those quiet moments alone, in the dark and silence, he won't escape. He can't.

I pity him, but I wouldn't want it any other way.

Every time I blame Clinton for 9/11, people think I'm crazy.

https://www.darklock.com/blog/?p=5

But you look at his track record, and you just have to ask: why *isn't* this a perfectly reasonable accusation to lay at his feet?

The Left only accept that a Republican can be a bad person. It's fundamental to their world view.

"Liberals are people who want to do nice things and help everyone else. Therefor, when I accept the Leadership of the Liberals, I too become a good person. Anything a good person does must be a good thing, so Liberals can sometimes make mistakes, but they're always good people that MEAN well."

Conversely,

"If you're not a Liberal, then you must be a BAD person, because only a BAD person would not recognize how good Liberals are. If you oppose the ideas of Liberals, this means you are a BAD person, and any action by a BAD person is a BAD thing."

See? It's all so reasonable. So Clinton could never have done anything BAD...

The Clinton Administration proved for 2 entire terms that they have no grasp of foreign policy, which derives from their leftist world view. Anyone who believes that the Democrats are capable of handling things as they stand today is fooling himself.

The beauty of all of this - the SC decision handed down, and Pelosi's reaction, and the left's complete misread on Iraq - what I once thought as a down year for the GOP is looking more and more like a breakeven - or dare I say - even a winner in November. Just keep doing stupid stuff Dems. Why do you think Hillary is trying so hard to stay on the right of all the dingbats on the looney left?

Why do you think Hillary is trying so hard to stay on the right of all the dingbats on the looney left?

Well, she's got a very fine line to walk, because the dingbats are the ones motivated enough to get off their butts and vote in the primaries.

So Hillary tries to stay to the right of the loonies, but not too far to the right.