![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
All Flash
Posted by Stephen Green · 26 April 2006
Outside the blogosphere, is there any Left left anywhere at all? Comments
TO: Stephen Green ....I was just talking about this with the distaff. My explanation is that most of them suffer from 'adult' onset Attention Deficit Disorder. Libral talk radio dies on its feet because their target audience can't listen to anything more than a 120-second sound-bite. If it cannot be expressed in gut-feeling within two minutes, they can't follow it....all that well. And therefore, they get bored and tune in some music. And if they change the subject and start screaming about IT, instead....well....one can only take so much vitriol at one time. Even if you agree with it. Regards, Chuck(le) I was really surprised at the Kos book. Makes you wonder how many Kossacks there actually are (never mind the traffic numbers, to how many viewers is the Daily Kos important? How many take the trouble to post?). Posted by: tim maguire at April 26, 2006 12:36 PMTO: tim maguire They ['progressives'] probably can't read all that well in the first place. As in hold a train of thought for more than a few minutes. Let alone carry on a cogent discussion about the material they've read. Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 26, 2006 12:39 PMSo sad.... Posted by: Lyric Mezzo at April 26, 2006 12:46 PMI consider myself an independant moderate (socially liberal). That said, I read more 'conservative' blogs than 'liberal' ones, mainly to get an opposing viewpoint and another perspective on things. I find the 'liberal' blogs (especially dailykos) to be over-the-top alarmist and conspiracy-theory oriented. They are boring. Also, they are very pro-democrat.. lately my feeling is that both parties stink and neither has the nation's best interests at heart. Why aren't the 'progressive' blogs as popular as conservative blogs? It could be that the target audience just isn't as interested in political punditry. Compare how well conservative talk radio and TV programs have done with liberal talk radio. There are no 'liberal' pundits as successful as Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reiley, etc. Who represents the left as powerfully as those represent the right? John Stewart? Al Franken? If the market demand for 'liberal' talk was as strong as it is for 'conservative' talk, Air America might actually get some ratings. - tsohg P.S., Limbaugh, O'Reily, and Hannity are hypocritical windbags, but I have to admit their shows offer more compelling radio than anything Air America has to offer. For myself, I'll stick with Howard Stern. :-) Posted by: tsohg at April 26, 2006 01:43 PMThe loony left is everywhere, so why spend money on another source whose opinions are available free 24/7. The reason conservative books and talk shows do well is that the conservative point of view is missing in the larger world. Fox News was there for a while, but now that the sheik bought into Murdoch, Fox, other than Brit Hume, is no better than the nets.
TO: tefta Fox is nothing more than People magazine these days. Hardly worth the effort to vist their web-site. Regards, Chuck(le) As much as I want to believe that the low KOS book numbers are correct I have a hard time squaring "only 3,630 copies" sold with the very high Amazon.com sales rank (#26). Anybody have more sources on this one? Posted by: JA at April 26, 2006 03:34 PMI'll guess that Nielsen looks at physical stores, and Amazon doesn't get included. This could map into the highly net focused audience, so that the dailykos folks would mostly look to Amazon as the place to get books. It is interesting, however, to see that conservative/libertarian Internet books tend to not only do impressive sell through on Amazon but also in the real world. Posted by: Hey at April 26, 2006 03:56 PMTO: JA "...I have a hard time squaring "only 3,630 copies" sold with the very high Amazon.com sales rank (#26). Anybody have more sources on this one?" -- JA What's the source of YOUR report? I'm looking at Amazon's Top Sellers list and #26 is....the envelope pulease.... Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln's Killer ...and it ain't by the chief Kossack. Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 26, 2006 04:04 PMA blog that might be of interest to you and the readers - http://junkdrawer.typepad.com/ Marybeth is a Philadelphia-based producer and documentarian who somehow managed to get herself invited on a behind-the-scenes Pentagon program called the Joint Civilian Orientation Conference. She's blogging while she's documenting for a future film. Posted by: Addie at April 26, 2006 06:22 PMHey Chuck, Our "chief Kossack" is currently at #17. See http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/new-for-you/top-sellers/-/books/all/ref=sv_b_2/104-0706011-7724728?%5Fencoding=UTF8 And for a true comparison, how many books as instapundit sold? TO: Jediflyer Thanks for the information..... Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 26, 2006 07:01 PMThe People ain't got time to read, man! They don't got no time to listen to no jive radio! They're in the street, man! Taking it to the Man, man! Speaking Truth to Power, Man! Posted by: richard mcenroe at April 26, 2006 09:52 PMI will toast to the death of the Left-left and the Right-right. Maybe we can get back to the sane/insane divide. Posted by: MikeK at April 26, 2006 11:17 PMAre you referring to the crotchless left? Posted by: almonte j. mayfair at April 27, 2006 05:40 AMFrom allegation to refutation in 8 seconds. Ain't Google grand? Kos at 11 and still climbing... and not a single Bushvoter in the top sellers: How about PBS? How about the colleges or the majority of foundations seeded with the dollars of wealth dead capitalists? Their is plenty of Left left. Posted by: Gary B at April 27, 2006 08:04 AMI think the Amazon list is for hourly sales. Which is why Kos' book is at 33 right now. Posted by: Pro Libertate at April 27, 2006 08:37 AMTO: JA, Jediflyer & Pro Libertate "I think the Amazon list is for hourly sales. Which is why Kos' book is at 33 right now." -- Pro Liberatate I think you're onto something there, PL. Regards, Chuck(le) All hail Matt Drudge! "King Maker"! Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 27, 2006 09:09 AM[quote]"The demos are better, and listeners trust AIR AMERICA to give them the real truth on issues and the Bush presidency," says the insider.[/quote] Yeah, both of them :) Posted by: ed at April 27, 2006 10:37 AMTO: All Currently it's at 49...and apparently falling. You Kossacks better go out and buy some more copies. Give em to your friends. Or use them as paperweights/doorstops/kindling. Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 27, 2006 02:17 PMP.S. What was I saying earlier about 'short attention spans'? Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 27, 2006 02:17 PMConsidering that Kos is outselling Insty and Hugh based on the same metrics Drudge cites, maybe Vodka should have asked "is there and Right left"? Posted by: Ugh at April 27, 2006 02:21 PMTO: Ugh Considering that the Amazon.Com ranking seems to be based on hourly sales, as opposed to cummulative ones, I think the Kossacks here, trying to hype the ranking on Amazon.Com are playing a CON game. Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 27, 2006 02:40 PMDudes - I gave you a link. Click on it. On the "internets" we have these things called "URLs" which allow you, not only to make an assertion, but to instantly support it... like this, from the Center for American Progress: Guys, even Glenn Reynolds admists Drudge screwed this story... But you can NEVER go wrong ragging on Air America... Posted by: richard mcenroe at April 27, 2006 09:15 PMTO: All People must be taking my advice.... ....it's back up to #29. Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at April 27, 2006 09:34 PMdrudge's claim was based not on amazon ranking but bookscan numbers. according to those same numbers, kos' book has sold (marginally) more copies than reynolds', despite having been on the market half as long. any chance of a retraction? Posted by: belle waring at April 28, 2006 03:14 AMTO: belle waring Would you have a source we can see that says Kos is doing better than the Instapundit? Regards, Chuck(le) click on the hyperlinked word in my comment: "numbers." Posted by: belle waring at April 28, 2006 08:52 PMIn a short book for AEI, Charles Murray analyzed income data for a large sample of full biological siblings (who of course share familial socioeconomic status). His analysis showed that the differences in adult SES were closely related to individual differences in measured IQ. It would follow that the high heritability of IQ cuts against the assumption that more intergenerational mobility is somehow "fairer." http://www.aei.org/books/filter ummm, not to badger anyone, but...any thoughts on having the original premise of the drudge article decisively refuted? surely this is worth a mention, given that insty himself has posted on the subject? Posted by: belle waring at April 30, 2006 03:57 AM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"I'd do him."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |