![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Give'em a Break
Posted by Stephen Green · 20 March 2006
In USA Today, Kathy Kiely writes The House of Representatives is on track this year to be in session for fewer days than the Congress Harry Truman labeled as “do-nothing” during his 1948 re-election campaign. Kathy says that like it's a bad thing. If we really want to improve the way Congress conducts business, then let's move the Capital to, say, Phoenix - and not allow them to have air conditioning. Winter sessions would be held in Fairbanks, Alaska and without heat. And let's not forget to stock the chambers with man-eating tigers. Comments
Historically the stock market does better when congress isn't in session. Why? Probably because there isn't the usual incredibly destructive economic ideas being proprosed. What better example is there for less government than the fact that we are, literally, richer when the government is "doing" less. Posted by: jag at March 20, 2006 10:33 AMYour suggestions certainly would make CSPAN much more interesting. Not that any change would make it more interesting, but the Tigers would be fun. Posted by: Nylarthotep at March 20, 2006 10:47 AMI receive email updates (propoganda) from my Congressman regularly. The latest was a schedule of meetings and office hours he will be holding in his district. It seems as if at least he is using this time to actually meet with constituents if they're interested. Is that really bad thing? They do represent us after all. I think its at least worth a moment of pause to think about what the balance ought to be of in-session time vs. time in their district. Posted by: Nick at March 20, 2006 10:52 AMThat was the idea of the Founding Fathers. Every been in Foggy Bottom in the Summer? The Founders thought that the Legislatures would have to abandon the Capitol, but then some jerk invented air conditioning. Quel domage. Posted by: D. Delk at March 20, 2006 10:59 AMNick, it's a good thing. The less Congress is in session, the better, because they can't do any damage when they're not in session. Whether they spend their recess time with constituents or relaxing on the beach is of little importance. Posted by: Adam at March 20, 2006 11:01 AMI think it was Will Rogers who said "no man is safe in his home so long as congress is in session." Posted by: tim maguire at March 20, 2006 11:29 AMA smart friend of mine suggested rotating where the Congress sits every two years - Kansas City, St. Louis, San Diego, etc. Get 'em out and see the rest of the country, as well as cure the plague of a permanent infrastructure of K street, etc. Posted by: Major John at March 20, 2006 11:36 AM"And let's not forget to stock the chambers with man-eating tigers." Nah, too obvious, and also too quick and easy. Fleas are better. They don't kill, but _boy_ do they ever irritate! For extra credit, drop a flea in the legislooters' ears that Somewhere In The Building (interlude for ominous oboe music) is a colony of mice infected with a human-lethal, flea-transmitted virus. Posted by: wolfwalker at March 20, 2006 12:45 PMIf we really want to improve the way Congress conducts business, let's put our honorable representatives on a business schedule. No self-respecting CEO takes that much vacation! Posted by: Lord of the Fleas at March 20, 2006 02:03 PMMore time for recess appointments! Posted by: Scott in CA at March 20, 2006 02:27 PM"No man's life, liberty or property are safe while the legislature is in session." --Mark Twain Too cynical for Will by half. Posted by: porkopolitan at March 20, 2006 05:33 PM...let's move the Capital to, say, Phoenix.... Hey. What've you got against Phoenix? But at least it's a dry heat. Or so I've been told. Posted by: azlibertarian at March 21, 2006 07:54 AM"And let's not forget to stock the chambers with man-eating tigers." No, no, no. We must reach out to our brethren across the aisle. I recommend the Sharon Stone Commemorative® Komodo Dragons, instead. Posted by: richard mcenroe at March 21, 2006 08:20 AMIsn't it Texas where the legislators meet only every other year? And here in Colorado they're only in session about the first third of the year - and still manage to get little done, and less of that well done. How about Congress only shows up every other year - and doesn't get to do sound bites when not in session? Works for me. Posted by: OldeForce at March 23, 2006 12:35 PMIn Wyoming, I think they meet every other year for 40 days. There's an old joke that says they should meet every 40 years for 2 days, instead. BTW, the Denver Post editorialized for a pay raise for the legislature. My response, which they said they were considering for publication, is here: http://lifesbetterideas.blogspot.com Posted by: David Aitken at March 23, 2006 10:34 PM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"...the ideal substance of style combo."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |