![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I Wouldn't Pay a Dollar to See That
Posted by Stephen Green · 13 December 2005
In this week's Entertainment Weekly, Stephen King tells us what's wrong with Hollywood: Many of this year's best movies were really depressing. (No free link, so I'm not linking at all.) King goes on to list what he thinks were the best movies (pre-Christmas releases) of 2005. In order: The Jacket Of these ten movies, King admits right up front that five of them were "bummers." Of the ten that weren't bummers, we have: The tale of a psychologically-wrecked Gulf War vet. Remember, those are the "happy" five-best of the year. Admittedly, there are some good movies on the list. In fact, most of them are quite good for any year. "Downfall" blew me away when I watched it on DVD, as did "Crash" and "The Devil's Rejects." I haven't yet seen "Capote" or "The Squid and the Whale," but I'm dying to see both, even though they're "bummers." Yet here's what King has to say about them: Capote is also Part 1 of What's Wrong With the Movies this Year: a great film about a brilliant, repulsive, manipulative, coldhearted bastard whose progress as we watch as scientists might watch microbes mounted on laboratory slide. Murderers Perry Smith and Dick Hickock are ultimately more sympathetic. During the Depression, Hollywood made fabulous movies with fabulous people inhabiting fabulous sets. Often, they sang and danced to fabulously happy songs. During the War that followed and its aftermath, Hollywood gave us heroic tales, even though the heroes were often flawed (think "Casablanca") or the situations were, shall we say, nuanced (think "Command Decision"). I don't ask that Hollywood glorify the Iraq Campaign. Or even Afghanistan. But would it hurt them to give us more than a few heroes, in a time when we could use them? Or failing that, is it too much to ask for more than one honest tragedy this season? Shakespeare's tragedies still resonate all these centuries later because in the stories he told, the world was just – it was people who were flawed. Most of Hollywood's tragedies can't sell tickets even on opening weekend because in the stories they tell, the people are still flawed – but only because the entire world is crap, too. Shakespeare taught us that the wicked would get their just desserts. Hollywood wants us to think that we're all wicked, and deserve whatever we get. Considering the state of the world – and considering many people now have big TVs and DVD libraries chock full of genuine heroes and heartfelt tragedy – it would be nice to be reminded now and again with new movies that we aren't all doomed. It would be nicer still to be reminded that even if we are doomed, maybe we don't deserve to be. Hollywood has come up short on ticket sales this year. Maybe they'd have done better had they not used their product to sell us all short.
Comments
A must-see for every American: Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Jimmy Stewart at his best. Posted by: JonBuck at December 14, 2005 01:11 AMNah. America wants a movie version of My Favorite Martian where the Ray Walston role is freshly cast as Tim Robbins as a parable for the transnationalist community as the superego for the American id. Greenlight it now! A box office smash in 2007 or summer 2008! Posted by: Brian J. at December 14, 2005 05:02 AMThere are "good message" movies. Harry Potter. Narnia. The Incredibles. Spiderman. They are aimed at kids mostly. Everything coming out of Hollywood is dark - even the independent stuff is dark. Sin City for example. The funny thing is that the dark movies lose money, and the lighter movies make money, yet they still make more dark movies. That probably says something about their mental stability. Posted by: Zendo Deb at December 14, 2005 06:14 AMI'm really surprised that he didn't mention Serentiy, considering it was one of his recommended movies at StephenKing.com... Posted by: Steve at December 14, 2005 06:46 AMWhat about Serernity, Batman, Narnia? I.e. racist facist far-right fundie rethuglican movies that everyone watched. Posted by: Nunaced at December 14, 2005 07:18 AMI'm with you, Steve. Serenity is the only movie I saw in the theater this year. More, please. And faster. Otherwise it's TCM (thank heaven Ted hasn't ruined it) and DVDs for me. You can also send the same request to the novelists. Much fiction since WWII (and likely WWI) has been depressing from the get go. Posted by: Mikey at December 14, 2005 07:20 AMI've only heard of three of those films and seen none of them. The only films I shelled out to see this year were 40yo Virgin and Serenity. The only films on my radar currently are Geisha, Kong, and (grudgingly) Narnia. Posted by: Scott Janssens at December 14, 2005 07:26 AMmovies I saw in the theater, Narnia, Harry Potter, I will see King Kong. Films I will never end up seeing. Syriana, War of the worlds, Munich, Brokeback Mountain et al. I want to see good movies, finely made, telling stories. I am tired of left wing moralists and thier propaganda plays that tell me how evil America is, Posted by: kevin at December 14, 2005 07:45 AMThe only movie I would agree with him on was Cinderella Man--but any list that has War of the Worlds on it is automatically suspect. That was pure tripe (and I'm not convinced that Crash was anything other than self-serving moralizing). I'll have to think of what would constitute my "best" of the year and whether they are uplifting or not--but this list isn't even close to what I would suggest. Mmmm, Serenity... Posted by: zombyboy at December 14, 2005 09:07 AMSo Hollywood smells of garbage! Try a decent movie with good acting, like Last Orders (with Michael Caine). Posted by: Neil at December 14, 2005 09:32 AMActually, Crash sucks so bad it's nearly unwatchable. And, without having seen any of the others, I'm going to bet most of them suck, too, since most movies suck (general rule). The only movie on that list I was interested in seeing was Crash, and, as noted, it sucked, so now I'm waiting for Netflix to send me Cinderella Man, just because something tells me I need to see yet another inspirational film about a boxer as a metaphor for life. Posted by: William Young at December 14, 2005 10:15 AMI'm mildly flabergasted by the description of War of the Worlds as an "action adventure" movie. It's a (very depressing) horror story, and always has been. And yet, for some reason, part of the movie's ad campaign involved trying to sell it as another Independence Day. I saw it on DVD, and while visually well done, the fact that all three lead characters are so unlikeable makes it hard to care about what happens to them. Posted by: BA at December 14, 2005 10:22 AMI'd like to catch Mr. Washington goes to Smith! What, you all missed Wallace & Gromit? Posted by: owen at December 14, 2005 10:55 AMNo offense, but relying on Stephen King to evaluate quality film is like relying on Chef Boyardee to evaluate quality food. You have a very good point about honest tragedy and overall quality, but the main problem with your argument is overgeneralization. As others have already pointed out, there are plenty of heroes to be found in movies today, and movies in the 30s and 40s weren't all wine and roses, either. Don't forget that was the era of the Universal monster flick. Or All Quiet on the Western Front (now there's one that turns those frowns upside down). Many of the great Hitchcock films. Most of the better films of that era went well beyond simple good triumphs over evil. And on the other side, you have the unfortunate stereotypes, such as the happy darkies in GWTW and Song of the South. But I think the main problem is not optimism or pessimism or any particular genre. It's that very few people in Hollywood (or anywhere else for that matter) know how to tell a story anymore. Posted by: LNS at December 14, 2005 11:55 AMThere are the books and movies that other authors and filmakers and critics want to read and see, and then there are those that the average person seeking entertainment wants. If they want to make products for Cannes rather than Kansas, well, *shrug*. Posted by: lrC at December 14, 2005 03:13 PM"Most of Hollywood's tragedies can't sell tickets even on opening weekend because in the stories they tell, the people are still flawed – but only because the entire world is crap, too. Shakespeare taught us that the wicked would get their just desserts. Hollywood wants us to think that we're all wicked, and deserve whatever we get." I'd modify the first somewhat and disagree with the second. In Hollywood the people are flawed because the world is crap. And Hollywood thinks that anyone whole-heartedly supporting the USA is wicked and gets what they deserve. Anyone who is a 'patriot' in their eyes are the tragic heroes. Posted by: ken at December 14, 2005 04:21 PMIt's also the lack of originality that's hurting the movies. Along with the list of dark depressing overly-messaged movies, add one that are remakes, made off of television, video games or any other mass media crap. Exhibit A: They're making a sequel to, "Dude, Where's my Car?' It's entitled, "Dude, I still Can't Find My Car". Posted by: Remo Williams, The Master of Sinanju at December 14, 2005 08:48 PMAnother good "downer" movie conspicuously absent from King's ten-best list, not to mention the comments here so far: Star Wars Episode III. (Well, good except for the lousy Anakin-Padme dialogue, and George Lucas's half-baked attempts at a political message. Everything else Lucas finally managed to get right, and not a moment too soon.) |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"I'd do him."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |