...and they'll be the first to receive 100 lashes under sharia law when it hits America.

Opposition for oppostion's sake lacks any logical sense.

I wrote about this a few months ago when they staged another protests.

I don't think you'd actually be so in favor of this group Stephen if you saw the quality of the breasts being displayed. But that's just my opinion. I'm all in favor of breasts... but even I have standards.

Wait, they're suing to pre-emptively prevent enforcement of an existing law? I would love to see a court try that. Please keep us informed!

Them boobs are da bomb!
Seriously, I looked at history and the current MidEast situation to decide to support regime change in Iraq. Am I supposed to change my view because of a couple of naked ta-tas? And they aren't even Jessica Alba's ta-tas?

TO: Stephen Green
RE: Wrong Answer, Guy

"Rights issues aside, when confronted with the choice of either breasts or bombs, the correct decision is "both."" -- Stephen Green

You OBVIOUSLY have not seen these 'women'.

I have. Little Green Footballs pointed the way to some photos of an earlier event this group staged.

It took me a hour to stop retching. We're talking SERIOUS issues with health maintenance. They might have been pretty in the 60s, but that was some time ago.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Oh yeah these broads are BUTT ugly and should remained completely clothed even in the DARK, but on the other hand they'll go a long way to absolutely turning off mainstream America to there lefty lunacy, so it may be a net gain in the long run.

If you follow the link above you can see a scrawny, hunched old geezer hippy festooned with stenciled peace signs over his hideous old naked body, with his scrotum artificially inflated to a grotesque proportion. A more powerful recruiter for the Republican party doesn't exist!! LOL!!!

Man in the area should make T-Shirts to where to the protest:

"BOTH!!"

Going to war is great. We free a country and get public nudity here at home.

TO: All
RE: aaron

Another sucker, heard from.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Surprised your wife let's you get away with these comments these days ;-)

How is she doing by the way. You've not commented lately? Hope all is well

When people take a foolish position, we should support their right to argue it foolishly. Even if it does hurt the eyes.

they should be arrested for all violations of the law.

they should also do the maximum, consecutive, for all violations.

hopefully they'll end up in jail for 20-30 years. free speech ends at the point of someone else's nose, or in this case, their ability to avoid going blind.

Why on earth should the police back off? They're blatantly disobeying the law, even if they were attractive. So if they wanna protest by going topless, they oughta go to someplace where toplessness is acceptable.

Why can't we get some protestors who are more like "bombs with boobs" instead of these folk?

I agree they shouldn't be busted. The Cops should JUST SHOOT THEM! Also, someone should puncture Mr. Scrotum's nut bag.

I also have seen the pics, and am surprised I haven't gone blind.

There was even one "woman" with a goatee! Hey, maybe that was Amy Carter?

Hey I agree i am all about the boob. However, this woman is not the best example of boobage. she is as we pc loving types say, gravitationally challeneged. FAT!

That's positively indecent!

So, where exactly do they show their breasts?

i am also a big fan of boobs. but i detest media/attention whores. look at me, look at me. give me a f*ckin break.

sherry Glaser, the leader is 40DDD. and it ain't a good 40DDD if ya know what I mean. found this at zombietime

http://static.flickr.com/25/59828514_7741536455_m.jpg

TO: All
RE: ACCKK!!!!!

MY EYES! MY EYES! I CAN'T SEE!!!!!!!

Regards,

Chuck(le)

I am NOT going to look.

(Though I'll admit that sometimes I need the reminder that failing to have a gravity problem is a *good* thing.)

this is what happens when women like these burned their bras in the 1960's and 70's. Did any of these women hear of Gillette, Shick, or Bic??

Inner beauty and outer beauty, these females have niether.

I work on Capitol Hill in DC - maybe they could c'mon over and protest? I'm sure the Congressmen and Senators, upstanding citizens all, would know how to handle that situation.

Me. I'd be in it for the boobs.

adchalet

wonder if they'd go to DC to protest in a DC winter? Lets see how far their convictions would go.

If it was a particularly cold winter I'd say their convictions, and nipples, would go quite far.

I agree boobs and bombs are better. Check out this eye catching example:

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/12554

When Bo Derek and Pamela take the CHP to court, I'm there. These Guernseys, tho? Not with bin Laden's personal goat tamer...

richard mcenroe

When you say Pamela, I take it you mean Ms Anderson.

My husband says they should protest in Iraq--that the troops wouldn't mind protecting that protest. They could call it A Rack to Iraq Project!

The world outside our borders demonstrates daily Islamic Zealots’ relentless murder and bullying of people of all faiths. But within U.S. borders, the Left acknowledges no enemy but the American Right. International Islamic outrages of just the last week: Three adolescent Christian girls beheaded in Indonesia; more than 59 Indians killed and 114 injured by at least three bombs placed in crowded markets and a bus in New Delhi, during a Hindu Festival of Lights; bombs three truck bombs AIMED AT THE INTERNATIONAL PRESS CORPS IN THE HOTEL PALESTINE IN BAGHDAD. The pace of Islamic terrorism against the world is such that you would have to devote an entire website to just show a listing of the outrages dating back more than a few days.

I have seen photos of the bodies of the three girls. Michelle Malkin has a link to a blog, which has a further link to Reuters archive. Those pictures will disturb you, but you have to face them and keep in mind that they show us the horror those bare-breasted harpies defend. The Reuters main page doesn’t show any obvious pathway to its own archive for those same photos, as though it is reluctant to share the ugly facts of the atrocious behavior. This is consistent with the silent acquiescence of the media to the bullying, threats, and intimidation by Islamic terror groups that has been elsewhere documented.

Meanwhile, safe within the borders of their own country, the Democrats seem to have a view of events as seen through a soda straw. According to them, all the evils of the world— despite Islam’s 14-century history of slaughtering its neighbors — can be attributed to the bungling or malevolence of Bush and his cronies. The alleged women of this protest, like so many pathetickers on the Leftward edge, seem to be reliving the Vietnam protest era. In those days, there really were a lot of girls who would say “yes” to boys who said “no” to the war. Great.

Well, in the fullness of time, it appears the so-called sexual revolution was a huge component of a much more profound self-imposed delusion we have in America: i.e., that reality is somehow obliged to conform to what we think it should be, just because... well, we REALLY WANT IT.

If these idiots want to show their nakedness as a protest, I don’t see much to be gained by arresting them. More likely their displays if allowed will alienate people far more than they can possibly understand.

Well, sorry to disappoint but it looks like there will be no boobs on display (at least that kind of boob, anyway) at the Capitol protest:

A Sacramento federal judge ruled Friday that there is "no First Amendment right to bare breasts on the grounds of the state Capitol" and refused to restrain California Highway Patrol officers from arresting a group of women who want to stage a topless protest.
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13817053p-14658014c.html

What I find interesting is that BNB wanted to make a shocking protest not of the war but one that: "focuses primarily, though not exclusively, on various initiatives (on Tuesday's ballot) we oppose that Governor Schwarzenegger supports."

So it's not even about the war. Boobs Not Bombs should rename themselves "Have Boobs, Will Protest".

Groups like BNB do not so much express a considered opinion in opposition to Bush or Schwarzenegger's policies, but are a self-involved, narcissistic expression of displeasure at how Republican policies make them feel. At least back in the day, protesters were willing to be hauled off to jail and go to court for their convictions. Instead, BNB goes to court in advance of the protest to clear the way so that its members won't be inconvenienced by lewd and lascivious conduct arrests on their records. How courageous is that?

Sure, her too.

Don't build a strawman, someone can be anti-war and anti-radical-Islam at the same time.

DAMN YOUR EYES!!!!

"someone can be anti-war and anti-radical-Islam at the same time."

Well, it's kinda like being anti-NY Yankees; unless you play them, you'll never defeat them.

Wait, they're suing to pre-emptively prevent enforcement of an existing law? I would love to see a court try that. Please keep us informed!

You can actually do that, and it's even commoner than you might think. When a plaintiff is threatened with imminent future harm by government action that is alleged to be unconstitutional, you can seek prospective relief.

...and they'll be the first to receive 100 lashes under sharia law when it hits America.

It sounds like you can't wait.

If they wonder why a misogynist culture wants to blow up Americans, maybe someday they'll understand that protests like these are part of the reason.

Translation: If they put their shirts back on, the terrorists have won.

Wow, sounds like you're ready for Sharia Law too!

Amazing.

Let's do this again because I know some of you people are slow on the uptake.

Correct me if I misrepresent your position, which is as follows:

1. Islamist Terrorists want to kill us because of our bombs AND "decadence".

2. Islamist Terrorists want to kill us because women show their ugly boobs in public as a protest.

3. We should give in and appease the terrorists by covering up boobs and by ending all bombing campaigns in Muslin lands.

Jason -- Isn't that Pat Buchanan's platform?

To elucidate, Jason:

Previous commenters were pointing out the irony of women protesting a war by using methods for which our enemy would kill them, given the chance.

If you doubt that the average reader of this blog is quite happy with breasts in general, just check out the blogroll.

Thanks for pointing that out, Mastiff, but I think irony is rather lost on Jason. He's too infatuated with his own disingenuousness.

Check out the Boobs Not Bombs blog: http://breastsnotbombs.blogspot.com

And be sure to visit Sherry Glaser's website:

www.sherryglaser.net

Some people will do anything for attention even real stupid things but they just do it for the attention of the liberal left-wing news media

TO: Patrick Carroll
RE: Nailed...

"Some people will do anything for attention even real stupid things but they just do it for the attention of the liberal left-wing news media." -- snowy egret

...on the first beaking.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

The chances are that the breasts to be exposed are not going to be the kinds one wants to see. Picture Cindy Sheehan with no top. Now try to procreate.

because ugly girls aren't allowed to exist. well damn. ugly guys neither. all you assholes can go kill yourselves now, kthxbye.

The radical Moslems might kill them for exposing their breasts. The goons on this blog would only do that if they didn't find their breasts attractive.

Which statement is true?

1. They hate us because of our freedom
2. They hate us because of our boobs
3. They hate us because of our foreign policy

Duh. #3. Get with it.

Goons...? Why, because they ridicule the ridiculous?

Look, a woman who uses her sex to make a point or get her way is already confessing that she has nothing intellectual to offer in support of what she wants. She might still succeed with some men, though, if she is fairly attractive. These women are not. So, not only are they using their sex to try to manipulate people, it is a pathetically futile attempt. They are embarrassingly clueless as to how they appear to other people. Far from convincing anyone, they just underline how out of touch the anti-war movement is with the American public (as if nominating John Kerry wasn't enough).

Yeah, that sure explains the "rioting" in France.