![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
"Species Traitor"
Posted by Stephen Green · 27 September 2005
The bad news is, people like this not only exist, but mean deadly serious business. The good news is, more sensible people tend to be armed. Comments
I am reminded of a fictional terrorist gang that appears in several scenarios in the Railroad Tycoon II game: People Against Humanity. Life imitates art. (In the initial scenario, PAH attacks a monster geothermal plant in Spain - getting its energy supply direct from the Earth's mantle - and you have a set amount of time to send enough cement by rail to do the repairs. There's a catch: geothermally-induced global warming is causing ocean levels to rise - which will eventually cut off parts your rail system.) Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at September 27, 2005 02:16 AMTO: Allan K. Henderson "Species traitor exists as a forum for spreading and developing theories and practical means to bring about the destruction of civilization and defend what wilderness remains." -- Bidinotto ...gangs in computer sims? I'm reminded of that group of greens in Rainbow Six, a Tom Clancy novel. Regards, Chuck(le) Posted by: Chuck Pelto at September 27, 2005 05:42 AMI had to laugh when I saw where these folks were headquartered. I worked for 7 years in Greensburg (about 25 miles east of Pittsburgh), and for some reason there are a disproportionately high number of wackos in that region. It's a semi-rural rust belt area with a lot of drug trade happening. What you end up with is marginalized blue-collar conservative types rubbing elbows with "better-living-through-chemistry" enthusiasts. Imagine if Hunter S. Thompson had written "Deliverance" and you get the idea. Which may explain why the little town of Jeannette (adjacent to Greensburg) plays host to an annual Bigfoot hunters convention: http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_washington/20031005wabigfoot1001p6.asp Posted by: Ginpundit at September 27, 2005 06:19 AM They're against the "mass death culture" by advocating the death of the human species? Reminds me of the AFLAC duck running into Yogi Berra. And wouldn't the Endangered Species Act protect humanity from extinction? Posted by: rbj at September 27, 2005 06:33 AMMaybe what needs to be done is for civilization to shun this moron. Post his name and address in the papers and ask everyone to decline his buisness when he tries to buy anything. He doesn't like civilization? We don't like him either and choose to exercise our right to interact ( or nt interact ) with who we choose. Posted by: Chris Van Dis at September 27, 2005 08:01 AMThey are no different than the people who want to go to war with the rest of the world and turn it into one big Wal-Mart built by Halliburton. Posted by: Toad734 at September 27, 2005 12:22 PMWell, well, well. If these folks are serious about wanting to destroy cvilization and even humanity itself, I submit the following recommendations. 1. Send your money and anything civilized and of worth to me, I'll take care of it, honest I will. 2. If you really want to rid the planet of humans, please start with yourselves. We'll be follow in just a while, really. We will. Posted by: Tim P at September 27, 2005 02:25 PMToad, Removing two dictatorships so that 50 million people can choose their own governments... why, that is EXACTLY a plan that requires 9/10ths of the human race to die. Opening discount stores so that everyone can have cheap consumer goods... yes, that is EXACTLY like "bringing about the destruction of civilization." Do words mean ANYTHING to you? Or did you stay at university for a very, very long time in the Post Modern Thought department? Posted by: Bostonian at September 27, 2005 02:54 PMI'm gonna guess there aren't all that many "thoughts" happening at ToadThoughts.com... Posted by: RDub at September 27, 2005 03:24 PMWal-Mart and H sound good to me. Posted by: Sandy P at September 27, 2005 03:49 PMRDub, Good call. "Doesn't anyone see the similarities between the last Star Wars and the our current situation?" [over a Photoshop of Bush as Palpatine] Real deep thinker there. These people are the nutcases that want to live in, "go back" to, or otherwise recreate their fantasy of "life in the Ewok village". That is a term I use for people who seem to think that all life's problems will be solved by banning technology and innovation, banning "consumerism", banning war, banning Starbucks, WalMart,(your choice here), banning....oh, you get the point. The less extreme ones are everywhere - you know, those people who are always trying to stop "development" or "sprawl". The ones who insist that a three story building is "massive". Those who insist on "urban infill" and "transit villages" rather than allowing one to have a home with a yard. The ones suing to stop freeways, insisting that "everyone" take mass transit. In the Ewok village, we are sustainable, renewable, and non-polluting. These are the people who drive old VW buses that run on Crisco. I am really, really, tired of them. But since I live in the SF Bay Area, I am doomed. Posted by: Scott in CA at September 27, 2005 05:12 PMYou learn something new every day. For example, I had no idea Halliburton built Wall-Marts. But now I do. Posted by: Foster at September 27, 2005 08:15 PMWell, once we turn into three foot tall teddy bears with suspiciously placed large, tree-based weaponry, an Ewok village sounds like fun! Posted by: MikeTheLibrarian at September 28, 2005 05:52 PMIs Al GOre their honary chairman? "We have wished, we ecofreaks, for a disaster or for a social change to "We must ... reclaim the roads and the plowed land, halt dam construction, "We must make this an insecure and uninhabitable place for capitalists and "To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem." "This is as good a way to get rid of them as any." "I got the impression that instead of going out to shoot birds, I should go "The planet is about to break out with fever, indeed it may already have, "Now, in a widening sphere of decisions, the costs of error are so "A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific "[W]e have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, "Let's face it. We don't want safe nuclear power plants. We want NO "Scientists who work for nuclear power or nuclear energy have sold their "We've already had too much economic growth in the United States. Economic Paul Ehrlich deserves special attention, because his views sum up the Of course, that inevitable mass starvation didn't happen unless you were He still recommends reducing population by force, saying: "Several coercive "The right to have children should be a marketable commodity, bought and "Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the Lastly, when Prince Philip of the United Kingdom, leader of the World
|
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"Even when he has nothing to say, I still like looking at his picture."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |