This better not get anywhere. I'd rather have Barbara Lee as far away from me as possible.

But what would become of the capital press corps? The horror, the horror!

Good instincts.

But I ask you to forget the social magnetism of central power for a minute and think of technology per se. The folks at Darpa are working on technology to make weapons controlled by thought only... those tiny little electrical brainwaves can now be read.

So how would you keep anything secret that needed to be transmitted from, say, Chicago to D.C.? I don't know much about technology, but I know there are tempested computers (and rooms) for secret projects and communications, and they exist for very good reason. Even Jimmy "Ah need attention at all costs" Carter signed onto recommendations that electronic voting systems be backed by paper records. Why? When it comes to electronic data, the smartest guy wins. And he may not work for the government.

Anyone who wants to broadcast senate business - by any means - cross country deserves sex with Dvorak. You can toss a coin to decide who is on top.

Seriously.

I don't think it would work. It's the city council rule of government -- decisions are made by the people who show up to the meetings.

For a closely related point, do you think that, say, the Military Appropriations committee could maintain adequate oversight of a multibillion dollar program via teleconferencing? I don't -- I'd demand that trusted aides have physical access to relevant files and offices, and once I demanded that, I'd essentially have to live in Washington myself.

Does that mean they wouldn't get their per diem and free water? Just think of all the freebies/price cuts they would have to give up.

Haircuts
Lunches
Health Club
Banks (?) heh
Drivers/Cars

I'm sure there's more. They'd have to pay for their day to day living just like the rest of us. NEVER HAPPEN!

Hasn't Bush has been doing for the past 5 years?

So how would you keep anything secret that needed to be transmitted from, say, Chicago to D.C.?

The same way you do it now- encryption. Google 'VPN' for more info.

Anyone who wants to broadcast senate business - by any means - cross country deserves sex with Dvorak.

Have you ever heard of C-SPAN? ;-)

One-half of congress back home with the folks and the other one-half in DC schmoozing as usual - after say three months, switch groups.

Well, we're going to need to be able to do this in order to run our interstellar empire anyway. Might as well use the Congress as a pilot project to get the bugs worked out.

After the Holographic House and Senate is up and running we could then just pull the plug on the Congress all together and let the regional governors rule directly.

What cracks me up about this is the naive notion that this would reduce "hounding by lobbyists in a corrupting environment."

It would likely do the opposite; corruption works best when targeting individuals, not groups. Being able to work over politicians in their private office, outside the glare of Washington, for all it's faults, would be a boon to those attempting to buy favors.

Of course, this all assumes lobbying is a problem. When are people going to realize that lobbying IS democratic; it's how the voices of the electorate are concentrated. There's probably even a lobby for stupid computer journalists.

representing the greater East Sphincter, Utah area.

Ah! You've been to the Uintah Basin, I see.

Hey! I grew up in Wichita and live in Nebraska. I don't want those people anywhere near here.

Hell, I thought we elected Henry Waxman to get him OUT of town...

I'm in a bad mood tonight but my grandmother would swat my hand for being impolite, so I will dial it back in her honor:

1. Do you really believe that government spy agencies... even European ones... are seriously hampered by commercial encryption programs? By now even Somalia has probably back-doored enough personal pcs to crunch through it. There is simply too much processing power laying around, and government communications are worth the time and effort it takes to crack a serious encryption code. Your breathless description of your last blind date? Pretty safe, even if you choose your birth date as the encryption key.

2. And yes, I've heard of C-Span. Do you seriously believe that the meat of Congressional negotiating is actually done before the cameras? Is your mother's first name Cindy? Just checking.

I know, that wasn't quite polite. I apologize, grandma.

1. Do you really believe that government spy agencies... even European ones... are seriously hampered by commercial encryption programs?

Yes.

I work at a datacenter. Had a customer stop by the other night. Nice guy, used to be an analytical mathematician for the NSA. While he worked on his server, we had a chat about the projections of how much computing power they thought they'd need, and how far off they were... So yeah, I think commercial encryption- at least, the public-key stuff- gives the government spy agencies headaches.

Just don't use anything developed in France.

RE: rosignol reply

Oooh!
Distributed Intelligence =1
Cynical Snark =0
Crack-a-lacka-boom!
D.I. Winnah!

We can't count on the guys in D.C. to spearhead this, since it would be making them MORE accountable. However, over half the states have ballot initiatives in their constitutions (or otherwise part of their legal fabric). Instead of waiting for Congress, what if several states started ballot initiatives to force their Washington elected representatives to spend (say-) six months per year in their state and available to the taxpayers/voters. And required their state legislatures to appropriate sufficient funds to furnish appropriate conferencing facilities?

You know, something revolutionary, say - taking back some control and enforcing accountability

This hasn't been thought through. Where's the virtual smoke-filled room?