VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
The Manchurian Mom
Posted by Stephen Green  ·  15 August 2005

What I want to know is, who brainwashed Cindy Sheehan?

It's one thing to want a policy changed, when that policy resulted in the death of your son. Obviously, I've never had to bury a child – but I have seen firsthand what it does to a person. "I won't live long enough to get over your father's death," my grandfather told me on a couple occasions. But his words, though not oft-spoken, were unnecessary. Every time I saw him, every time we spoke, was evidence enough.

I don't begrudge Sheehan her grief. Hell, no.

But when she starts talking about getting "Israel out of Palestine," I have to wonder: Who brainwashed her?

Sheehan said those words just days, hours really, before Israel began its painful and bloody pullout from the Gaza Strip. Later, Israel will abandon settlements in the West Bank, too. And let's not forget that ever since the Oslo Accords, large swaths of the West Bank have been in Palestinian hands.

So when Sheehan talks about Israel getting out of Palestine, I can't help but think that she means, "Let's get six million Jews on planes bound for Miami, pronto."

Who brainwashed this woman?

If six million Jews must be displaced in a modern diaspora to assuage her grief… well then, who are the Mass Media to question her? Have you seen one, just one, non-blog juxtaposition of Sheehan's demands on Israel, with the self-inflicted violence Israel is suffering today? What Sheehan demands, Ariel Sharon is already trying to deliver - at a price paid in lost blood and political support.

Who brainwashed Cindy Sheehan? What made her snap? Why is she taking out her excusable rage on a people who have nothing to do with her grief?

Sheehan's grief over the loss of her son has apparently turned into a hatred of All Things Western. She says she won't pay the taxes President Bush already reduced for her. She seems to think that Israel – not radical Islamists – are to blame for her deaths. She says that this war is about cheap oil, even as we pay ever-higher prices for light, sweet crude.

What I want to know is, who brainwashed Cindy Sheehan?

Comments

It's the phenomenon of cable TV news media-mob short-attention-span blanket coverage of issues, propelling individuals into their Warhol 15 minutes, during which they start to feel they are cogent commentators on anything and everything, Hollywood star-like.

In a couple weeks, the media will be off to another missing babe, celebrity trial, or whatever, and years from now, when Bush is out of office and the U.S. is out of Iraq, the IRS will eventually send Sheehan's tax case to the prosecutors, and she'll be amazed that her media pals don't care anymore, and President Hillary couldn't give a crap either.

Posted by: Pard at August 16, 2005 12:27 AM

The Jooooooooooooooos!

Posted by: Robert at August 16, 2005 12:52 AM

I am a Jew who is angry about this. The world wants to keep blaming us for its problems.

There are times that I wish Hitler had killed all of us (Jews, that is)...then the world would have to find someone else to blame.

Posted by: hugh at August 16, 2005 05:02 AM

Come on, no one brainwashed her: Scratch a leftie hard enough, uncover a raging anti semite.

What i wd like to know is who brain washed 80% of the jews who vote Democrat and tacitly support the Cindy Sheehans and her political ideas?

Some of the most ridiculous moonbattery i have heard uttered is out of the mouths of my jewish relatives - some of whom might ever agree with this evil bitch.

Posted by: doit at August 16, 2005 06:03 AM

What Pard said, but also: What about the media who provide her with a forum? Do they agree with her rantings or do they only hate President Bush? I saw a street person downtown yesterday who I am sure would be very happy to put on the same show for them.

Posted by: nk at August 16, 2005 06:33 AM

P.S. Yahoo reports that her husband has filed for divorce. No details. There are things happening with that family that we do not know about.

Posted by: nk at August 16, 2005 07:06 AM

Stephen, I think you're being too kind. She's a long time political hack who has finally found a fawning media and leftist supporters (and funding). I have sympathy for everyone else in that family, but not her. She has taken her grief as license to beat everyone with whom she disagrees. And no one of substance should give her a pass.

Posted by: Sammy's Boy at August 16, 2005 07:26 AM

I personally don't care about her views. Her views on the war can change, or stay the same. That's all her rights. But since she's only met the president once, and there are two different versions of that same meeting, then I have to question who put her up to this. It's like a freind of mine in college, who broke up with the prettiest girl in school. After the breakup he said she was ugly. He was wrong then and she's wrong now by changing her characterization of the meeting. Either he wa nice, or he was'nt.

Posted by: plainslow at August 16, 2005 08:08 AM

Bill Kristol might be right in that Sheehan is hurting, or will end up hurting, the Left she has sold her soul to far more than the right that she despises more than fascism (the real thing, not fantasy) itself.

That 'Israel out of Palestine' is such the tell. Anyone notice that she is screaming (yes, screaming) it at the very moment that Sharon is excruciatingly evacuating the Gaza? For Sheehan and Co, this fact doesn't even pop up on the radar screen.

Not to mention the fact that Israel and Palestine have exactly WHAT to do with the honorable death of her son? Ooooh, right, it's the Joooos around Bush that are at fault, just like the Morganthau's and Rothschild's whispering evil policies into Franklin Roosevelts ear in 1939-1942. Would have been peace in Europe were it not for those "Jewish bastards", etc.

This is your Grrl, Left and Air America, et al? Is it?

Yeah, you go with that.... AGAIN!

Posted by: Andrew X at August 16, 2005 09:02 AM

Remember, she not only wants Jews out of Gaza and West Bank. She wants ALL Jews out of Middle East and into the sea. That's really no different than what most of the Jihadists wants.

Posted by: BigFire at August 16, 2005 09:29 AM

I may be wrong on this but I think the issue of the Jews was the result of a question she was asked by some airhead with a microphone. She didnt have a news conference to announce this position.
Granted, she shouldn't be answering questions like that but--again--she shouldn't be asked either. I wish the folks at Camp Casey could report when news is made and just shut up when news isn't made.

Posted by: OsamaBLaden at August 16, 2005 09:52 AM

WELL IT WASN'T HER HUSBAND. HE JUST DUMPED HER. GO FIGURE...

Posted by: Teel at August 16, 2005 09:56 AM

1) What Ms. Sheehan's husband or family does or does not do is irrelevant. George W's mother is in favor of abortion; so do we condemn him or cast aspirations on him for what his mother does?
2) What Ms. Sheehan says about Palestine is irrelevant. The Lutheran church just condemned Israel for the Wall they built; do we condemn every Lutheran?
3) The woman lost her son. She asked for a meeting with the President. He declined to sit down and listen to her. She is, as he has stated, entitled to her opinions and viewpoints. He does not dispute that, why do some of the readers here disupute that?
4) Our President has time to take a two-hour bike ride and attend expensive fund-raising parties but not spend 20 minutes with the mother of a slain soldier? From a purely PR perspective the whole issue would disappear after that meeting. The press would move on.
5) It would not be a bad idea for the President to meet with every family of every American who was killed in Iraq and explain to them personally why their child/spouse/sibling was taken from them. Why would that be too much to ask?
6) At that meeting he can explain why the Bush twins nor any of his nieces or nephews have volunteered to go to Iraq. In fact, you don't see many politicians' children in the Armed Services at all. I wonder why that is?
7) When will we wake up and realize the reason we are in Iraq is NOT to bring democracy to people who clearly don't want us there, but to secure oil so that we can drive our increasingly large posteriors around in gas-guzzling SUVs? Talk about Conservatism!

Posted by: Luke at August 16, 2005 10:24 AM

People deal with loss in different ways. Like the founders of MADD, Ms. Sheehan has thrown herself into her causes.

Her living children back in California deserve better than her media circus.

Posted by: eLarson at August 16, 2005 10:39 AM

Hey Luke, that was tongue in cheek right? You can't actually believe everything you said there. BTW: She has already met the President, she came away with quite a different story back then. Do a google search and inform yourself a little.

Posted by: TedB at August 16, 2005 10:40 AM

Bravo Luke.

Posted by: Vince at August 16, 2005 10:40 AM

"she came away with quite a different story back then"

People are allowed to change their minds, you know. WMDS turned into 9/11 turned into freedom for Iraqi's.

Posted by: Vince at August 16, 2005 10:42 AM

Again, google speeches before the invasion. Come back and tell me how many of those never mentioned freedom for Iraqis. I think you'll find the number exactly zero.

Also Luke's statement was about the President never meeting her which is of course is also not true.

Posted by: TedB at August 16, 2005 10:53 AM

Vince, it's not so much that Sheehan changed her mind; of course she is "allowed" to do that. The point is that the president already met with her once. Luke is acting as though he can't spare "twenty minutes" to do so, when he already has. What does she want to say to him now that is different? If he meets with her now, and she comes to the White House two months from now demanding another meeting, will that be a reasonable request? How many times must he meet with her before his opposition will say that it is reasonable to stop acceding to the requests, or must he meet with her whenever and wherever she likes, as many times as she wants him to?

Luke,

"5) It would not be a bad idea for the President to meet with every family of every American who was killed in Iraq and explain to them personally why their child/spouse/sibling was taken from them. Why would that be too much to ask?"

It isn't too much to ask, within time constraints. There's an article in Newsweek now detailing how he does this, and the stories of a few of the families that he has met with.

"6) At that meeting he can explain why the Bush twins nor any of his nieces or nephews have volunteered to go to Iraq. In fact, you don't see many politicians' children in the Armed Services at all. I wonder why that is?"

I think you would have to ask the young people who have not volunteered why they have chosen a different path in life... their parents are not responsible for the choices they make, nor can their parents force them into a life that they do not choose for themselves. I doubt Cindy Sheehan could force her son to go into the military or to stay home, either- this is the choice of the individual, not of their family or their government.


Posted by: ali at August 16, 2005 11:05 AM
2) What Ms. Sheehan says about Palestine is irrelevant. The Lutheran church just condemned Israel for the Wall they built; do we condemn every Lutheran?

FYI, there is no "The Lutheran Church". There are several assorted denominations that go under "Lutheran", and if all of them agreed on this one thing, THAT'd be a miracle.

Posted by: Slartibartfast at August 16, 2005 11:10 AM

Why their spouse/child/sibling was "taken" from them?

Taken?

Didn't her son re-up?

Didn't she ask him?

Posted by: Sandy P at August 16, 2005 11:11 AM

I believe a prerequisite of brainwashing is for the subject to actually have a brain. To date, I've seen no convincing evidence that Sheehan has one.

Posted by: Mr. Lion at August 16, 2005 11:39 AM

Why do Jews still vote for Dems? Because some of us believe that while some fringe Dems hate us, the GOPs in power want to convert us.

I mean, the president once said that Jews can't go to heaven.

Forgive me for not trusting a man who may think I am enternally damned for reading prayers from right to left on Saturdays.

To Steve: Uproarious applause on the post.

Posted by: Chuck at August 16, 2005 12:12 PM

I am not blaming Ms. Sheehan, although I do feel considerably less inclined to give her as much leeway as before she started blaming Jews for her son's death.

If otherwise non-grief sticken individuals such as Luke can believe what he wrote above, then she can be given a little slack in her condition.

It's like two kids being instigated into a fight by others standing around continually urging the, possibly less than willing, participants to escalate and finally engage. Once engaged it's not hard to totally lose control and do or say alot of things they later might have reason to regret.

Unfortunately in this case, Ms. Sheehan will not be able to repair the relations with the family she seems to be alienating. After all is said and done, the "kids" urging her on will move on to another political tool leaving her without a son and a family for consolation.

Posted by: TedB at August 16, 2005 12:14 PM

Mrs. Sheehan is full of shit, but let's not pretend the security of Israel and avoiding a conflagration in the Middle East weren't considerations here.

I'm uncomfortable with giving Israel a free pass on this one. Someday we need to decide how much we are willing to give to prevent Israel from defending their own interests. It's almost like we don't trust them to defend themselves in a fashion that would not escalate into a full-blown world war.

Saddam was never more than a marginal threat to us, but he was a loose cannon in a ship full of powder. He had to go. But let's not pretend it wasn't Israel wearing the bullseye here.

Posted by: spongeworthy at August 16, 2005 01:08 PM

(The other) Chuck wrote:
"Why do Jews still vote for Dems? Because some of us believe that while some fringe Dems hate us, the GOPs in power want to convert us.

I mean, the president once said that Jews can't go to heaven."

Well, if the president is correct, he is trying to tell you how to get to heaven. If you are correct, then you know he's incorrect, so why would you care what he thinks?

Until there are calls for mandatory conversion, I would think that your greater concern should be the not-so-fringe democrats.

Posted by: Chuck C at August 16, 2005 01:13 PM

This poor woman is reminiscent of the grieving families of dead Vietnam war soldiers whom Kerry interviewed for his book and who later complained that he exploited their grief for partisan politics. Some returning soldiers were even so unhinged that they lied about atrocities and later recanted, but the damage was done.

Posted by: erp at August 16, 2005 01:20 PM

She did.

Posted by: Ken Hahn at August 16, 2005 01:24 PM

Spongeworthy,

Saddam cared about the Palestinians as about much as do the Saudis or any other arab country that insisted on keeping the Palestinian people in isolation within their own lands.

Ultimately it's not about Israel. If there was no Israel it would be about our support of Egypt, or Saudi Arabia, or our tacit approval of what's going on in Chechnya or american oil companies involvment in arab oil fields or (take your pick of any alledged grievence). Israel is nothing more than an excuse or lightning rod sitting right on top of free markets and liberal societies.

Israelis just happened to be the ones who showed everyone that a liberal democracy is actually possible in the ME. What boils people in the ME is that countries with much more in the areas of natural resources and wealth are still backwaters relative to western society's success as manifested by Israel.

Israel has been fighting this war for us for decades. Only recently have we cared enough to actually give them a hand. It's 1941 all over again.

Posted by: TedB at August 16, 2005 01:48 PM

"Until there are calls for mandatory conversion, I would think that your greater concern should be the not-so-fringe democrats."

You mean I should ignore people like James Dobson and Rick Santorum who essentially do that? Damn good thing these people have no power...

Posted by: Chuck at August 16, 2005 02:03 PM

It was the cigarette smoking man...

Posted by: Michael at August 16, 2005 02:22 PM

"You mean I should ignore people like James Dobson and Rick Santorum who essentially do that? Damn good thing these people have no power..."

They called for madatory conversion to their brand of religion? I must have missed that. Of course, GW might think I'm not going to heaven because I worship the Whore of Babylon. But, I Don't Care.

(from Wiki, so I owe you some grains of salt):"Liberal critics label Dobson as a fundamentalist, but some fundamentalists are among his severest critics mainly because Dobson works cooperatively with Protestant and Roman Catholic Christians and Jews, and because the organization is politically active."
For Santorum, there is mention about his views on SSM, Homsexuality, and abortion, but nothing about forced conversions to Christianity.

If you want to belong to the party of Cynthia McKinney, it's your choice.

Posted by: Chuck C at August 16, 2005 02:37 PM

The President once said Jews cannot go to heaven? This is the Internet, folks. I'd like to see a link on that. I don't buy, and beleive it is example number 8,927 of people reacting to what other (agenda-driven) people SAY Bush said, as opposed to what he actually DOES say, here in the real world, the latter being meticulously catalogued on an hourly basis.

Show me the link.

As for Sheehan, I repeat that "Israel out of Palestine" is a tell. She is perfectly allowed to pontificate on Israel, Social Security, whatever she jolly well pleases. But words mean something. WHAT does "Israel out of Palestine" mean? And isn't a bit odd in this context, which ostensibly is a focus on American boys dying unfairly in Iraq? Sharon's actions on this very day add yet another bizarre twist to the statement.

But if she is parroting a point by point agenda of not the Left per se, but the genuine, America- LOATHING Left, "Israel out of Palestine" makes perfect sense, and needs no elaboration or explanation.

And by the way, the "it's all about oil" is SO pathetically 20th century. Marx's ridiculous premise that ALL human activity boils down to economic gain has been discredited every bit as much as, well, creationism, at least. Yet the latter is mocked by so many who hold the former as gospel truth. You are as free to claim "all about oil" as Sheehan is to claim her laundry list of greivances. That doesn't make them even slightly more true.

Marx was a bloviating idiot, completely at sea over what human beings are about and what motivates them to do what they do. Deal with it.

Posted by: Andrew X at August 16, 2005 03:45 PM

If the United States was starting wars for Israel's benefit, would Saddam really be the first country on the list? I would think Syria and Jordan would be more likely, which would also be easier to sell regarding their connection to terrorism.

Posted by: Drinky at August 16, 2005 04:35 PM

Amazing how losing a child made Cindy Sheehan a heroic martyr who had to be listened to, but made the Schiavos too crazy with grief to be taken seriously.

Posted by: MarkD at August 16, 2005 04:42 PM

Give it a month and Mother Sheehan will be hunched over a bar somewhere with Berg's old man, wondering why her phone isn't ringing anymore, while the left waves its latest sock puppet around...

Posted by: richard mcenroe at August 16, 2005 06:22 PM

Bush should meet with Sheehan as often as she wants. He should place himself completely at her disposal. That is Bush's job now. To listen to Sheehan any time, night and day, to meet with her and let her report the meetings to the media any way she wishes, to change her story at any time to suit herself.

Sheehan is a media star now and has privileges. You must treat her with respect, you all must.

Posted by: Vuke at August 16, 2005 07:35 PM

Manchurian Mom...catchy phrase. Wish I had thought of that. I like the farmer with the shotgun the most.

Posted by: Teel at August 16, 2005 08:10 PM

You know, if they would just find that chick in Aruba, media attention on her would drop like a bad habit.

Where's a runaway bride when you need one eh?

Posted by: Billy Fish at August 16, 2005 08:44 PM

I'm not sure she's brainwashed, but I AM sure she's one happy stooge. This incident is but the latest installment of the seemingly endless saga of MSM organizations making headline$ for their bottom line$.

Posted by: -Ed. at August 16, 2005 09:02 PM

I wouldn't call Mrs, (soon to be "Ms.") Sheehan "brainwashed".

This woman isn't suddenly having any kind of revelation... she was against the war effort before her son was killed, and now she is merely using his death to garner attention to the antiwar effort, but even more sickeningly, she is using her own son's honorable death to gain fame for herself.

Cindy Sheehan has made herself the opposition flavor of the month, and is riding this wave of fame as far as it will take her. No more, no less.

She'd better cash in, while the cashing in is good. With any luck, she will even eventually be able to forgive herself for using her own son's death to attain celebrity (and dollars).

Posted by: Uncle Gropey at August 16, 2005 09:06 PM

It's not so much that Sheehan changed her opinion since her meeting last year with Bush -- anyone is allowed to do that, even if we don't understand the motives. The problem with Cindy began when she changed her story about what Bush said and did at the meeting from what she had told the Vacaville Record following the 2004 meeting. And the photos of that meeting which recently have been posted on the internet seem to back up her original recounting of the story, not the new version in which Bush is portrayed as both insensative and acting like he was ready to go out and party.

The revision of her meeting was the first dent in Sheehan's credibility, while the other statements that have followed have made her come across as at best misguided and spiteful towards targets that have nothing to do with her son's death. Odds are if her handlers have any political savy, she'll be appearing more as a mere TV image from now on, and her public utterances will be as limited as Harpo Marx, in order to maintain what credibility is left.

Posted by: John at August 16, 2005 09:16 PM

Chuck: the president once said that Jews can't go to heaven.

Would you please give a citation?

Posted by: gopher at August 16, 2005 10:39 PM

Anyone who screams like a lunatic is, well...a lunatic.

Posted by: Sharpshooter at August 17, 2005 08:15 AM

I can't agree with Luke's statement that the PR issue would just disappear if Bush took 20 min to meet with Cindy Sheehan. Quite the contrary. This is a form of public protest, and if it meets with results it will inspire yet more protests of the same kind.

I also like the snarky comment about Bush having time for a two-hour bike ride but not to meet with Sheehan (again). I, for one, emphatically do not want my country run by someone who does not take time away from the job to recharge his batteries. The insane workaholic atmosphere in D.C. already gives me the willies. (I also suspect that the people who make this arguement about Bush are also people who point to the superiority of the French lifestyle and working hours as superior to ours.)

Posted by: C. S. Froning at August 17, 2005 08:19 AM

"'Cause when you're a celebrity
It's adios reality
You can act just like a fool
People think you're cool
Just 'cause you're on TV
I can throw a major fit
When my latte isn't just how I like it
When they say I've gone insane
I'll blame it on the fame
And the pressures that go with
Being a celebrity"-- Brad Paisley

Posted by: Sharpshooter at August 17, 2005 08:31 AM

I will have to admit that I skimmed through these comments, but, I had my fill of the so-called grieving mother when I read her own words: http://www.veteransforpeace.org/convention05/sheehan_transcript.htm

Especially when she dishonored her own son: "I said to my son not to go. I said, you know it's wrong, you know you're going over there. You know your unit might have to kill innocent people, you know you might die. And he says, "My buddies are going, I have to go." He said, "If I don't go someone's going to have to do my job, and my buddies will be in danger."

Bear in mind that he had reenlisted. Also that the rest of his family, including his father, though they very much grieve his loss, feel proud of the love he had for this country that his mother did not and does not share.

Posted by: wordwizard at August 17, 2005 12:51 PM
Sheehan said those words just days, hours really, before Israel began its painful and bloody pullout from the Gaza Strip.

Could you possibly be any less accurate ?

So who brainwashed ABC into saying:
1. She never said these words, they were supposedly in an email.
2. That email wasn't hours before anything, it was sent 6 months ago.
3. The email cannot be produced.
4. The woman denies ever making such a reference.

Come to think of it, starting with who brainwashed you would be more relevant.

Posted by: John Colburn at August 18, 2005 07:39 AM

Bush is THE brainwasher, inundate with talking points until they can't think for themselves. What comes around, goes around and yeah, she never said it.

Posted by: Cupie at August 19, 2005 02:20 PM

So "she denies saying it" automatically is validated as "she never said it"? Interesting trick. How about the her visit to SFSU at a rally for Lynne Stewart at which similiar and even more insane things were said? She's never denied being there - but I guess when she does it'll become "she never said it".

Posted by: RDub at August 20, 2005 10:19 AM

I believe the primary revision Ms. Sheehan made to her story of meeting with Bush was how instead of being courteous and understanding he was a man of faith, what really happened was Cheney, Condi, and Rumsfeld showed up with a cooler full of bags of blood from babies and Casey and ripped them open and smeared the blood on their faces all while chanting "All Hail Israel." Just sayin...

But really, folks, let's really look at this from a psychiatric point of view.

- Ms. Sheehan had been a staunch anti-war protestor prior to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

- Casey joined the service, and re-upped.

Now what could that tell us about:

- Casey's relationship to his mother


Doesn't it mean anything to you to know that Casey did exactly what his mother hated the most, not once, but TWICE?

Ms. Sheehan knows the truth - she's an incorrugible bitch who drove her son to do the most horrendous thing he could possibly do to hurt her for a life she made him live in hell: join the service and put his life in danger... TWICE.

There are only 2 therapies for Ms. Sheehan - psychiatry, or a rope.

Posted by: DJ at August 20, 2005 11:28 AM

I am sick of Cindy Sheehan and her twisted ideas!...The PLO put there ugly mosque up on top of the Temple that Solomon built!...The Palestinians who supported that are disgusting old goat heads! AND that is putting it nicely!... Casey Sheehan died fighting for freedom and democracy! Many others before him allow us all the freedom and Rights we have today! Cindy Sheehan should be proud of her son. Instead the dignity and honor of his memory is being disturbed by her radical behavior!... Go Home Cindy and grieve in private!...

Posted by: Zsa Zsa at August 21, 2005 01:15 PM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"Vodka--it's not just for breakfast anymore."
-James Joyner

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori