![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Firefox
Posted by Stephen Green · 13 February 2005
I spent Sunday taking the Firefox web browser out for a spin, and have a few observations. Pros: • It's fast. Quick rendering, quick loading. 'Nuff said. • It's stable. I can't properly describe this, but Firefox just feels more solid than Internet Explorer. Despite being a 1.0 release, it never crashed no matter what I threw at it. • Tabbed browsing. It takes some getting used to, especially for a taskbar junky like me. Still, having one item on the taskbar for all my open browser windows gets rid of a lot of clutter. • It's secure. Firefox makes it a breeze to get rid of unwanted cookies, and keep them off my machine. That alone is worth the price of admission (free). Better, Firefox makes it easy to get rid of banner ads, Flash ads, etc. The cons: • Tabbed browsing. Yeah, I know I praised it, but it has its downsides, too. My taskbar only shows one item, which can make navigating from other programs back to the browser window I'm pasting into more painful. • It's quirky. For no reason I can tell (or fix), Firefox removes most of the functionality from the browser window I type my little blog posts into. • It's really quirky. When typing into browser forms, Firefox seems to enjoy rendering the curser on the letter I'm typing, rather than at the end of it. A small annoyance, but distracting when one is trying to blog. • Did I mention it's quirky? Scrolling down a web page isn't smooth, but rather staccato. And Firefox only scrolls one line at a time, rather than the three-lines-at-once default I have set in the rest of Windows. • Yes, there's one more quirk. I have Internet Explorer set to make an unobtrusive click sound when I click on a button -- lets me know I've clicked properly. Firefox can't or won't. As a result, I find myself unconciously hitting browser buttons two or three times. Final verdict? I'm going to use Firefox for sites like Drudge and InstaPundit and GoogleNews that I keep open all the time and check often. I'll also use it for surfing unfamiliar or ad-heavy sites. Not even Norton Internet Security's Ad Blocking feature works as well as Firefox, or as easily. However, when I need to get work done, Firefox isn't ready for primetime. But watch out, Microsoft: I'll be standing in line when Firefox 2.0 is released, with some of the quirks removed. Comments
Tabbed browsing (which has been around in Mozilla for ages) is soooo nice. Recently a co-worker showed me how to create tabbed shell windows on Linux (ctrl-alt-N for a new shell in the same window, then ctrl-alt-S to give it a name) and my desktop got even more decluttered. Er, less cluttered. Posted by: Floyd McWilliams at February 13, 2005 11:07 PMThere's an extension to smooth out the jerky scrolling. It allows you to select how much scroll it scrolls per click of the mousewheel while you turn it, and also if you hold down alt-it scrolls very fast. Check out Extensions. I use about 25-30 of them. There are some VERY handy ones. Posted by: FJBill at February 13, 2005 11:45 PMI've been using Firefox since Google News said 1.0 was available. Love it? It's a browser, get real! It works. It blocks popups. It shows me what I want to see and blocks most (nothing is perfect) of what I don't want. As a bouns: It isn't Microsoft! Who could ask for anything more? Posted by: Stanger73 at February 14, 2005 12:16 AMYou're forgetting something. Firefox functions much more efficiently when you think in Russian. Posted by: Will Collier at February 14, 2005 04:34 AMYou're still running MT 2.6something? The buttons work with Firefox in MT 3.1. There's also a little patch around somewhere that makes them work in MT 2.6. Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 14, 2005 04:49 AMDowload the tabbed browser extensions and then you can tweak how they work from the options menu. Also there is an extension called called autocopy which is pretty nifty. It automatically copies text highlighted in the browser window so you don't have to ctrl-C or right click, copy. Yeah, he's still running MT 2.6 something. There's only so many hours in the day, you know, and he's not nearly as, er, noisy as some of my other clients. Squeaky wheel gets the grease, dontcha know. :) Posted by: Sekimori at February 14, 2005 06:40 AMIf you keep using IE, have a look at www.avantbrowser.com -- it adds tabs, buttons for Flash blocking, pop up control, per-site cookie control, et cetera. Avant is a wrapper for IE, not a new browser, so you don't lose the compatibility you do with Firefox. Posted by: McGroarty at February 14, 2005 06:42 AMYou can turn tabbed browsing off, if you don't like it (I did). See Tools:Options:Advanced, which also allows you to tweak the scrolling. What makes Firefox really special are the extensions. AdBlock is terrific; SpellBound, GoogleBar, and ForecastFox are all worthwhile, too. Posted by: Mike at February 14, 2005 06:46 AMI've been using Avantbrowser for a while now (take a look at my archives). I'll have to say I'm in favor of it. The only thing I don't like is that it doesn't have as much of the drag'n'drop functionality with the address bar that IE has (In IE, I can drag the icon from the address bar into my favorites task pane and it will stay there, in the place I select.) Also, I order my bookmarks idiosyncratically, and it has a nasty habit of losing the favorites ordering. Has a GREAT pop-up eater, as well. And the capability of remembering the tabs I had open and re-opening them is pretty cool as well Posted by: Ian Argent at February 14, 2005 11:16 AMYay Firefox! You'll be amazed as how quickly you get used to tabbed browsing. It irritated me at first too. Ditto the others about going through all the settings. You can change a LOT of stuff about firefox, so take some time to go through all the options, 1 by 1. Having said that, yes, it's quirky, but I'll take quirky over shite anyday. Posted by: amy at February 14, 2005 11:55 AMI use Firefox all of the time without ever using tabbed browsing, and I haven't modified the default settings. That's because I always right-click on links and select "Open in New Window". (I was already used to doing this with IE, so no big deal for me.) Thus, my task bar is cluttered with four different Firefox windows at present. Posted by: Ash at February 14, 2005 12:23 PMI semi-regularly use Firefox on OSX, and it drives me to screaming rage every time. Why? Because the Firefox team, in their infinite wisdom, decided that text-selection behaviour in their product needed to work their way, rather than the way it works in every other piece of software in the system. Also, slow. But I should partially blame my hardware for that, I think. YMMV, but I still personally vastly prefer IE on XP or Win2k to every other browsing evnironment I've ever tried (and that's been a lot of them). Posted by: Sigivald at February 14, 2005 01:03 PMWhen the wife moved in last year and we hooked her Dell into my broadband network, that computer effectively exploded. Hibernating spyware, malware, you name it, came out of the digital woodwork; within a couple of weeks it was completely unusable. None of the anti-spyware tools could clean it up, despite wiping out literally thousands of bad files. In the end, I wiped her hard drive, installed XP, got her going on Firefox, and she hasn't had a problem since. End-o-plug. Posted by: Will Collier at February 14, 2005 01:45 PMNice little summary. I just have something to add, check out Mozilla's Thunderbird e-mail client if you enjoyed the feel of Firefox. I haven't gone back to Outlook since my first time using Thunderbird. Posted by: Komp Juan at February 14, 2005 06:45 PMI've been using Firefox since 0.91 (the final beta release), and I like it a lot. I don't use the tabs function as often as I should, but it opens multiple windows just fine. I love how it kills popups and animated banner ads; it's even better than the popup blocker in the Google toolbar for IE. (The built-in google link is a great thing too.) However, I'm not entirely sold on Thunderbird. I had to fool around with the settings for quite some time before I figured out how to fix the defaults to allow outbound mail. I also dislike the extra step required to get mail into my inbox; Outlook automatically downloaded messages to my inbox, but I have to tell Thunderbird to download messages after it informs me that messages are waiting on the server. I also have to prompt it to check when I open it, which is asinine. Posted by: timekeeper at February 14, 2005 10:21 PM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"Son, don't be stupid on purpose."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |