![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Breaking
Posted by Stephen Green · 1 February 2005
Imperial forces have captured popular Colorado Blogger Steve Green, as shown in this shocking, completely not made up photograph featuring absolutely no action figures of any kind. While Green is in Imperial custody aboard a secret battle station, the mercenary seen in this totally 100% real photo is believed to be in the employ of Mr. Bill Cosby, who wants his sweater back. We'll bring you more, as this really truly quite very real story develops. Comments
Ha ha ha ha ha. Thanks for making my day. Posted by: Downtown Lad at February 1, 2005 09:54 PMI think you're well-qualified to write for the Associated Press, now. Posted by: John Lanius at February 1, 2005 10:07 PMBe honest: did Dan Rather put you up to this? Posted by: nemesisenforcer at February 1, 2005 10:17 PMDarth: Stephen, I am your father! Stephen: Nooooooooo!!! "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to fisk a planet full of idiotarians while lounging around in your in your pajamas is insignificant next to the power of the Force." Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at February 1, 2005 10:53 PMWhat's the story with the stormtrooper to the right of Darth Vader? He has a very, What? What'd I do?? look. Posted by: E. Nough at February 1, 2005 11:28 PMSo, where can we get the Steve Green action figure? Is this going to be like the pre-Episode 5 thing when you sent in the proof-of-purchace from five other figures to get a Boba Fett figure before the movie came out? (only to wait a few more months while they redesigned his backpack so it no longer could shoot little Missiles Of Choking...) Posted by: Cybrludite at February 1, 2005 11:53 PMYou know, if the terrorists wanted to improve their image they should have kidnapped & beheaded Jar Jar. Posted by: Robert at February 2, 2005 06:35 AMGood luck blogging when you're frozen in carbonite. Posted by: Mike M at February 2, 2005 07:08 AMCybrludite, good one! I still have that Boba Fett, though without a shootable backpack missile. I had to make do with my Micronauts for shooting "missiles of choking." Posted by: John Lanius at February 2, 2005 08:03 AMDid you guys know that Steven once made the Kessel Run in under 12 parsecs? That guy is awesome. Posted by: Rob at February 2, 2005 08:16 AMHOAX NO LAUGHING MATTER Must I remind the blogosphere that the neojihadists still hold hostages, and they HAVE BEHEADED dozens and dozens of REAL PEOPLE, including Daniel Pearl. Making light of them and their ruthless practices demeans the people they've already murdered and those they currently hold - and those who serve in harms way AND MIGHT BE TAKEN HOSTAGE. I suggest that those who think it's funny (and suggest in their blogs that we'll next see claims of Mr. Bill or BERT & ERNIE or Miss Piggy taken hostage) - should volunteer to take the place of a current hostage! SHAME ON YOU ALL WHO MAKE LIGHT OF THIS. The hoax was crude and cruel; making light of it it bad form, too. UPDATE: LOOK: I think it's GREAT to have a sense of humor about things - BUT as long as there are hostages whose lives are threatened by ruthless thugs (who HAVE BEHEADED people), we shouldn't make light of it. It crosses the line for me, a line between good taste and bad taste. I think if someone made jokes about the people who jumped out of the WTC it would also be in bad taste... (like maybe someone could write a joke about how the jumpers were pyrophobes who weren't not afraid of heights); NOT FUNNY! Neither would I find it funny or in good taste to make jokes about abortion. It'd be better - in better taste - to make fun of our enemies, and not the victims of our enemies. UDPATE #2 - BOTTOM-LINE: I guess I am disappointed in the pro-war side for making light of this hoax. I expect this kind of sick humor from the DU, not us! JOKING ABOUT HOSTAGE-TAKING REMINDS ME OF WOLCOTT'S ASININE PRO-HURRICANE COMMENTS: it's cruel snarkiness is in bad taste! UPDATE #3 - TWO QUESTIONS: If it was a USA teen prankster making a sick joke (and who hacked the hoax onto the jihadist web-site) and NOT a jihadist who posted the hoax, then who are you making fun of by "piling on" with the doll/hoax jokes? And at who's expense, the jihadists or the families of hostages? Maybe Iraqi kidnappers get paid a bounty by the neojihadists, and they have to post a vidoe of their victims in order to collect, and maybe a kidnapper posted this hoax to collect a bounty he hadn't "earned?" It matters not - not to me, at least. WHY?!
And there are other families out there with loved ones who are now hostages. And there are families out there who have loved ones in harms way RIGHT NOW - fighting in Iraq or working on reconstruction projects there. They are all potential hostages. I would rather NOT laugh than say something that would hurt these familes or make light of their plight or potential plight. Obviously I'm in the minority - most pundits are piling on, and commenters at various threads are generally saying I should "lighten up." Maybe, I should. But, there certian things I will not make fun of. A cheap little laugh is not worth hurting people whose loved ones have been slaughtered by the ruthless enemy we are fighting, or whose loved ones are in danger because they are in the front lines. And we also should keep in mind that right here in the USA a family of four Egyptian Copts were SLAUGHTERED by our neojihadist enemies. So all of us here in the USA - especially bloggers who favor fighting back - should remember: the next hostage might be someone we know, someone we love, or even US. I don't think that's funny. It's a sick joke, in bad taste, and it ain't funny. UPDATE #4: A great and leading blogger - Jayson Javitz of POLITICAL VICE SQUAD (and the fabulous blog Polipundit) - wrote me, defending the "jokes about the hoax;" he wrote that - "It's not to make a political statement, in and of itself, it's just twisted irony." I think he's RIGHT! That's the "why," at least. Nobody thinks their hurting anyone by joking about hostages (except maybe the people who deserve it - like the neojihadists). The BRILLIANT Betsy Newmark of Betsy's Page said the same thing on a short thread at her great blog. Yet, I will not budge. I guess that makes me a middle-brow with high-brow leanings - someone who enjoys battling the seemingly never-ending downward spiral in pop discourse; the idea that when it comes to humor "anything goes!" I'm battling windmills, in a way - I know - but I think people should think before they crack the easy - and sometimes inadvertently mean or hurtful rejoinder. And maybe I've done that, a little, by posting on the "jokes about the hoax." In other words: I'm more a fan of (and miss) Johnny Carson's thoughtful and warm humor and regret the "Letterman-ish snideness" and the general snarkiness that passes for humor these days. Especially on issues of such public import as the GWOT. But Lettermen is very popular - as is snarkiness in the blogospere. I don't mind sayng: I don't like that kind of humor one bit - even of it does little good and makes many people think I need to "lighten up." What's right is right. What's in bad taste - is in bad taste. Popular, or not. PERIOD. Posted by: reliapundit at February 2, 2005 08:30 AM"It'd be better - in better taste - to make fun of our enemies". Erm... thought that's what everyone was doing. Personally, I would never disrespect a G.I. Joe doll. Posted by: Rob at February 2, 2005 09:13 AMSo, where can we get the Steve Green action figure? Why, right here! Of course, it'll cost you 450 clams and, going on form, won't look anything like him. Doesn't say anything about giving him action martini grip, either. Posted by: Angie Schultz at February 2, 2005 09:26 AMDamn reliapundit, I thought that they made everything bigger in Texas...apparently the soapboxes in your part of the country would tower over anything we have here. Damn, reliapundit, you posted exactly the same thing all day yesterday on the PoliPundit site. At least don't just cut and paste your concerns, okay? Oh, and one quick question. Do you happen to remember a very popular song here in the US in the 1940s called "Der Fuhrer's Face"? It didn't seem to tick off too many soldiers' families, or Jewish households either. Posted by: Jimmie at February 2, 2005 09:40 AMreliapundit, this is all poking fun at the scum who is doing the beheadings, and hilighting just how pathetic they are. Try decaf, and step away from the keuboard. Posted by: Crusader at February 2, 2005 10:49 AMReliapundit, what’s your point? Could you offer some specifics or elaborate a little? Posted by: DC Carter at February 2, 2005 11:14 AMThis will stir reliap's feathers a little but, oh well. The people who jumped from the towers did nothing but go to work under the premise that they would be comming home that day. To slight them would be huge bad form. The guys being beheaded go to work everyday knowing full well that it could happen. LET THE FORCE BE WITH YOU! Posted by: KevinC at February 3, 2005 10:53 AMSpeaking of "bad taste" reliapundit, posting an entire entry from what looks like your own blog, into the comments on someone else's blog is most certainly going to be perceived to be in "bad taste" by most bloggers. Looks spammish, even. Shame on you! Posted by: Desert Cat at February 4, 2005 12:35 AM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"So this is what he does in his office all day?"
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |