VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Travelers Are Not Always Tourists
Posted by Will Collier  ·  10 November 2004

The reader comments added to my post just below are a facinating read. Many of them are first-person accounts of time in Berlin, before and after the Wall. Most of the writers are American military veterans who were stationed in Germany during the Cold War.

One reader notes:

That is to be expected of course since the military has always been the easiest way to "see the world", but I wonder just how many liberals had the chance to see this event up close and personal like we have?

...

In fact, with the exception of the Vietnam War period where the draft caught up everyone no matter what their political persuasion, I would guess that there are many more conservatives who have traveled the world than liberals, simply because more of them have served in the military.

I wonder if this is a factor that the media, disconnected as it is from the world of military families and the military in general, has missed. I grew up in a small town in south Alabama, but because of its proximity to a large Army base (Ft. Rucker), I'd say at least a third of my grade-school classmates had lived overseas at one point or another, most of them in Germany. My own parents were stationed in England before I was born; I have a brother who's buried in the American cemetary at RAF Lakenheath.

Years later, when I went to work on Air Force bases, again in small Southern towns, most of the uniformed military folks I knew (including almost all of the enlisted troops) had lived in Japan, Korea, the Phillipines, Germany, Britain, or Italy, to say nothing of deployments to Saudi Arabia and/or Kuwait.

I have to wonder if the academic and media elitists who sneer at the "provincials" in the "red states" have any conception of those kinds of life experiences, much less the effects that they've had on veterans, their families, and their friends. The level of sneering directed South (or East, from the Left Coasters) over the last few days seems to indicate a considerable ignorance as to just how much international knowledge and experience the 'red staters' really have.

Comments

I wake up, get a Diet Dr. Pepper, turn on my computer, check out my favorite blogs (not going to say where Vodkapundit is on the list) and WHAM, I see Will has used one of my posts to make a point. Frankly, I am not sure if that is a good thing or a sign that the end times are near.

Either way, it makes you feel all tingly . . .

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 06:27 AM

I read in some obscure book that man does not live by bread alone.

To the Left, man does indeed live by bread alone. Dialectical materialism is the term they use to describe this philosphy. For one to believe this, you must have no soul.

The Left has no soul, so it can't understand freedom, the meaning of the Berlin Wall, the Contras, or the desires of oridnary Afghani's and Iraqi's for self-government.

Posted by: RandMan at November 10, 2004 07:28 AM

Is anyone else tired of all the bashing going on by both sides? I'd like to grab each side by an ear and tell them to grow up. That is really the most disappointing thing to come out of this election.

Posted by: Pat at November 10, 2004 07:51 AM

Off topic, but is Stephen okay? Is he just on hiatus? Did he give himself food poisoning? Is he in an Arafatesque condition?

Posted by: Peter Chandler at November 10, 2004 08:10 AM

Peter, I believe only Suha is allowed to release information on Stephen's condition.

Posted by: Ben Bach at November 10, 2004 08:24 AM

I grew up in small towns in Alabama as well. I did live for a short time in Oklahoma but there really wasn't much difference. My father was in the Air Force before I was born and did travel and he taught all of his children to read, travel, ask questions, not just accept everything around us as the only thing there is. After I left Auburn University I worked all over the US, including San Francisco and Boston. I met a lot of people in both places who had NEVER traveled anywhere else. In 1992 I was showing some people at Badger Engineering in Boston some pictures of Knoxville, Tennessee in the fall and they were all incredulous that the leaves had changed color. I said of course, it's fall. One of them said "I thought New England was the only place leaves changed color in the fall". These were college educated people. My advice- travel, talk expierence new places and people.

Posted by: Deacon Blues at November 10, 2004 08:39 AM

TO: Will Collier
RE: It's So Simple

"I have to wonder if the academic and media elitists who sneer at the "provincials" in the "red states" have any conception of those kinds of life experiences, much less the effects that they've had on veterans, their families, and their friends." -- Will Collier

They are projecting.

They are ignorant. And, to compound the problem, they are proud of their ignorance.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Stupidity: Ignorant and proud of it.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 08:44 AM

When I was in college 20 years ago, I boarded with two brothers. They were sons of an Air Force Col., and had done much of there growing up in Germany. They were South Carolina good old boys to anyone who didn't know them, but they spent their spare time as teens all over free Europe. They'd get on the train and go to sleep. Wherever they woke up, that's where they went.

Posted by: David [.net] at November 10, 2004 08:54 AM

Aw Shucks, when I finish tramping all around Parwan and Kapisa provinces of Afghanistan and come home (like I once did from Bosnia, Croatia, Hungary and Germany) I'll go back to my "Red" county and back into the sterotype box of 'yokel'.

Posted by: Major John at November 10, 2004 09:05 AM

MMMMMmmmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Me, too, but leaded.

Posted by: Sandy P at November 10, 2004 09:06 AM

I grew up in Arlington Virginia - where the Pentagon is. Many of our neighbors were Army families. With them and later with the sergeants I met in Basic Training there was always an understanding that the US was the best country. This was not ideology it was experience.

Later in my leftist days I met many students who were troubled by the assumption that the US was in any way superior to other nations. They felt that had they been born in another land they would have been bent toward belief in that country's superiority. They tried to achieve a kind of intellectual political freedom by adopting an internationalist or relativist stance. They tried to rise above the nationalism they felt around them and be free to criticize their country. We see a lot of that today.

The military families and sergeants who had served abroad were untroubled by these sort of musings. They had lived in other countries and had found those countries to be more rigid, more intollerant, and less just than their homeland.

Posted by: pat at November 10, 2004 09:20 AM

Another related issue.. young, virile GIs get stationed overseas and they bring back not only experience, but.. wives. I love having liberals lecture me on the bigotry of the south, when about a third of my friends in high school in our little Army town in Texas had mothers from other countries, and about a quarter of my friends were biracial. Interracial marriages are much, much more common among military families than the lily-white progressives.

Posted by: Tom at November 10, 2004 09:23 AM

There is a similar affect in Canada. These days (with Canada's creeping military disarmament by budget-cut) it's mainly the serving members, instead of also their families, that get the foreign experiences. However, the military members also get familiarity with American military personnel, bases and hardware. Thus the "best" place in the world to live in (from the Canadian point of view) gets translated into "Canada and the United States."

Posted by: SilverLining at November 10, 2004 09:41 AM

Proof positive the people who think they're better because they think they more know about things abroad had better damn well familiarize themselves with people on the otherside of street first.

Posted by: Bill at November 10, 2004 09:42 AM

Once, back in 1970, I was talking to a couple of other second lieutenants. They were new to Ft. Jackson and were wondering where they'd met before, which they thought they might have. Turns out they played football against each other in the dependents' high school league in Germany.
My first OCS tac, (the late) Darrel Wood, was a linebacker at a school on Okinawa where his bereaved fiancee had been a cheerleader.
Fraternity brothers had lived in Europe with the Air Force in which their fathers served. Didn't much like Italians, either.
It would be hard to tell these guys they don't know much about the world.
And as for the crack about not being able to find (your choice of country) on a map: Americans know various parts of the world very well. All things considered, most people would not want to be discovered by the Americans in the American fashion.

Posted by: Richard Aubrey at November 10, 2004 09:57 AM

wow. That is an excellent point. I too grew up in AL. At this moment, I have a cousin in South Korea and a cousin in Germany. All of my travelling was not military, but the wanderings of a youth. But I'm always surprised that of the number of Americans I meet, most are from red state America.

Posted by: scott orrell at November 10, 2004 10:09 AM

One thing that should be pointed out here is that military people stationed abroad live to a considerable extent in their own little world. If they so choose, they can have virtually no interaction with the locals at all. As it is, much - if not most - of their interaction is from either shopping or going out for drinks in the evenings (with their American friends, of course). It is an experience abroad, but it is far different from actually having intensive day to day contact with the locals or even the local culture. Most of the military people stationed abroad can't even speak the language of the country they are stationed in. They may see the world, but often they see it the much same way tourists do. It is not especially conducive to learning much about other cultures.

Posted by: js at November 10, 2004 10:12 AM

Scott, I didn't even think to mention it, by my sister's family is stationed in Germany right now (bro-in-law is XO for the 12th Aviation).

Posted by: Will Collier at November 10, 2004 10:12 AM

js: Even if they live in thier own little world they are STILL dealing for an extended time witha foriegn culture.

I spent 6 years in Germany and most of that time was living on the economy, which was what a majority of married EM's did. We went farther in that we changed most of our money into Marks and shopped like the locals did.

I do agree that few liberals of my (NY & NJ) aquaintence have ever been any place other then "here" but will ALWAYS tell me about a place I have been. My favorite is telling me what happened in Iraq and what the people thought after I returned from being in the country working with the people every day.

Gotta love that!

Posted by: MPSSG at November 10, 2004 10:56 AM

I can see that there is a certain amount of "group think" going on here after reading through the messages.

Of course, military personnel who have been stationed in the nether regions of American "influence" will have experiences and opinions regarding their postings! Why wouldn't they, they are rational human beings after all!

A soldiers opinion is nuanced from the word go. Does the fact that a soldier has been placed in a foreign country mean that that soldier now totally understands the psyche of the people and culture that he is now immersed in? I think not! He can skim the surface, thats all.

Military personnel grow up in an "American version" of wherever they are stationed.

Posted by: Damian at November 10, 2004 10:57 AM

I was born and raised in Huntsville, AL and joined the Army after high school graduation. With a break in service to attend college, my military experiences took me from Army Private to Air Force Captain. I've visited about 45 states and lived a month or more in 11 of them. I also spent 2 years in Germany with visits to England, France, Switzerland, and Holland. Subsequent travel has taken me to Tokyo and Guam. In that, my experiences are nothing special.

How many of the sophisticated "blue staters" have traveled as much? I've met quite a few who were very provincial. I've been to very liberal cities like DC, Boston, San Francisco, and was in New York City just last month. How many of them have ever visited the South or places like Colorado and New Mexico? Many of them claim to be so wise to the ways of the world yet they've hardly left their neighborhoods.

Posted by: Larry J at November 10, 2004 10:59 AM

Back in November 1989 I was in East Berlin as a tourist. Well, I was sleeping and eating in East Berlin, but I spent my days in West Berlin.

When i arrived home to Budapest in a morning, had the following conversation with my father.

- So, did anything happen while I was in Berlin?
- (just gave me a really stupid look).
- So? Anything?
- You don't know?
- No. I was away. I didn't read the newspapers.
- You really don't know what happened?
- No, and would you please tell me if anything interesting happened?
- OK, the Berlin Wall fell.
- ???
- ...
- Don't be kidding. I was there.
- Well, it is gone.
- Come on, anything happened? Don't treat me stupider than I really am.

At this time he quietly gave me the newspaper, and I was flabbergastered.

So I realized that I was just next to history, and I didn't even figure out... I was crossing the East/West Berlin border twice daily. Hmmm. Maybe it is good that I am not a journalist...

To be honest, the wall possibly came down after I left Berlin.

Vilmos

PS. This is a true story

Posted by: Vilmos Soti at November 10, 2004 11:03 AM

Damien, not all of them stick to the "ville"--- in a lot of places, especially outside Germany, many families lived on the economy, shopped locally, travelled on their own... and, yes, picked up enough language to get along. When my daughter and I came back to the states (after ten straight years in Greece and Spain), she was in the 6th grade, and they were doing Western European history, and she brought home her textbook and showed it to me... and everything that there was a picture of in that textbook--- we had visited!
Contrast that with the fact that at least a third of the kids in her class had never, ever traveled outside the state they were living.

Posted by: Sgt. Mom at November 10, 2004 11:10 AM

"Military personnel grow up in an "American version" of wherever they are stationed."

I beg to differ. At the beginning of the year I visited a friend who is a civilian working for the Army in Korea and to say that he lives in a "little America" is totally wrong.

Even spending 10 days there I could appreciate the social, cultural, and practical differences of being in another country...and Seoul is a very westernized city. Someone who lives in another country for a couple years would have a very good understanding if it, even if it's on a military base.

Sure, kids go to American schools and can watch AFN, but it's not like they live in this little America bubble that shields them from the outside world. Anyone who lives in (or even visits) a foreign country for any length of time finds it to be a profound experience.

Posted by: Mike M at November 10, 2004 11:16 AM

Perhaps there is "group think" going on here. Perhaps military personnel and their families have tended to "live in their own little world" while stationed overseas.

But the fact of the matter is, even if a military member and his or her family got off the base/post 10 times in a year for their normal three year tours, that would be 30 times more foreign experience than the vast majority of liberals who claim superiority in the area of "world view".

Add in the fact that military members have ongoing professional contacts with the military of other nations and I still say that the military has a better insight into the world outside the USA.

One could argue that it is a "militaristic" point of view, but since the military of most European nations tend to be more liberal than the American military (and draftees in many nations), chances are we are still getting a well-rounded point of view.

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 11:22 AM

js: You're right that a lot of military people can live in their own "Little America" as I called it. And for a few months that's what I, and most of my fellow Marines, did in Japan. After that adjustment time I, and almost every other Marine I knew, began to venture further and further out and interact with the "locals" more and more. At the end of my year there I had several Japanese friends and yes, even spoke a bit of the language. Am I an expert on the Japanese culture? Of course not. Do I have more knowledge of it than a tourist? You better believe it.

Posted by: Jarhead at November 10, 2004 11:22 AM

"The level of sneering directed South (or East, from the Left Coasters) over the last few days seems to indicate a considerable ignorance as to just how much international knowledge and experience the 'red staters' really have."

At the same time, we must note that George W. Bush had never been outside of the country when he ran for his party's nomination in 2000.

If Democrats have been stereotyping 'red-staters,' then so have Republicans. There is no homogenous 'feel-good' solid bloc of 'red-state' people. I live in Knoxville, TN, a state that you'd think would be solidly for Bush. He won only 57-43. That means almost half the state voted for Kerry, that almost half the state was willing to basically vote for anyone to get Bush out of office.

The moral of the story is: don't exaggerate the solidity and safety of your own positions by misrepresenting the level of Republican support in 'red states.' The vast majority of the states are purple; they can change, and will change.

Posted by: jean-paul at November 10, 2004 11:41 AM

If you all are so worldly why are you such bigots?

Posted by: Max at November 10, 2004 11:57 AM

Jean-Paul, a 14-point loss isn't even close in basketball.

Posted by: Will Collier at November 10, 2004 12:05 PM

JP - not 1/2 the state, a little over 2/5 of voters. Kids can't legally vote.

Nice try, tho.

Posted by: Sandy P at November 10, 2004 12:18 PM

Max makes a presumtuous point. He surmises that bigotry is negative.

I maintain that soldiers are conditioned and whether they like it or not, are bigots!

This does not fit in with tolerance of other cultures.

Posted by: Damian at November 10, 2004 12:28 PM

"The moral of the story is: don't exaggerate the solidity and safety of your own positions by misrepresenting the level of Republican support in 'red states.'"

I think that should be an even sterner warning to the Democrats. Look at Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire. That's 52 EV that Kerry won by a *total* of about 200,000 votes (Bush won by around 130,000 in the "close" Ohio).

We're talking 0.18% of the vote! The electorate swings 0.2% towards the Republicans and this election is a total blowout.

The Democrats are the ones that have to be scrambling and building bridges. They lose any ground among blacks or unions (not to mention anyone else) in the midwest and they may never win another Presidential election.

Posted by: Mike M at November 10, 2004 12:32 PM

The only bigoted people I have met recently are the liberals who are not willing to accept any view of the world but their own . . .

You don't last very long as a bigot in the American military . . . those people usually get booted out or leave after not getting promoted.


Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 12:45 PM

TO: Max
RE: Bigots? Nous?

"If you all are so worldly why are you such bigots?" -- Max

Hardly.

I was raised an AF brat, SAC, specifically. Did the Cuban thing at ground zero round-one, Offutt AFB. Bags packed and stacked by the door. Dad was a combat crew commander for an ICBM site outside of town. If he got the call, we all hit the door at the same time. He for his battle position, we for northern Wisconson.

I recall doing my high school thing in late 60s in Louisiana. I was amazed at how much some people hated me because I didn't hate black people as much as they did. I attribute my lack of bigotry to having lived and associated with them in the Air Force.

So, I suppose your calling us 'bigots', is really just projection as you, not knowing us, accuse us of what you are practicing.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Prejudice: A vagarant opinion without visible means of support.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 12:54 PM

The toleration of other cultures? Really, Damien. Like how the Japanese regard everyone else as lesser beings? Like how the Greeks despise the Turks, and vice versa? And how the Spanish and other Europeans feel about Gypsies.
Yep, only Americans are bigots, and everyone else is a marvel of toleration. Riiiiiiight!

Posted by: Sgt. Mom at November 10, 2004 01:13 PM

I gave this some thought and I think the comments by Max and Damian are simply another example of the hypocrisy of the left.

They tell us how much they appreciate the military and that they are as patriotic as any right-winger alive, but in the same breath they call us bigots and incapable of being tolerant of other cultures.

Man, with friends like this who needs enemies?

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 01:27 PM

Anyone live in or around Eufaula, AL? My dad's family lived there and in Barbour County for the past couple of hundred years.

Posted by: Polly at November 10, 2004 01:27 PM

TO: Sgt. Mom
RE: Don't Forget....

....the Chinese. Those on the mainland still have issues with anyone from outside their ancient civilization. Then there are the Farsi, vis-a-vis any other Arabs.

Oh yeah. Lest we forget the Hutu vs. the Tutsi (Rwanda match of '94).

In my career in the Army, I've lived and worked with a whole schlew of people from all over the country and a few countries outside of ours as well. Most fascinating stuff.

These poor sods that haven't had this kind of experience 'hate' us with the same sort of passion I see in other highly-parochial cultures.

It's one of the reasons I support the idea of universal governmental service before being enfranchised. Get these kids a REAL 'education', as opposed to the tripe the NEA feeds them.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[One of the biggest mistakes and the greatest blessings I ever had was enlisting in the Army.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 01:29 PM

You know, those of you who have been in the military who have described their experiences abroad actually reinforce my point when I said they "see it much the same as tourists do." Put a tourist in any country for an extended period of time and of course they will have more interaction with the locals than one passing through for a week. But the only real difference is really the amount of time they spend there. Of course you learn and see more over 2 years of "tourism" than you do in a week. However the depth of understanding remains relatively superficial until you leave "Little America" completely behind - which few can or are willing to do. Mom comes to visit me here in Germany for 3-4 weeks every year. She probably has had at least as much, if not more, contact with Germans and has a better understanding of the culture than people who are in the military and have been stationed here continuously for years. How much contact and understanding is that? No offense to my mom, but it's not much. She can't speak the language, she can't read a newspaper, she isn't constantly and completely exposed to another culture. Seeing a place, even for an extended period of time, is not the same as understanding it. Having a few foreign acquaintances who communicate with you in your language is not the same as understanding a foreign culture. Of course, there are few people anywhere with an in-depth understanding of a foreign culture. (Most Germans are scratching their heads in astonishment that anyone except a madman would vote for Bush, yet he was re-elected with nearly 52% of the votes. Worlds collide. Few truly comprehend where the others are coming from.)

Has anyone else noticed that somehow the thread morphed from "We red staters have travelled more and seen more of the world than the blues think we have" to "We're better than they are because we travel more"? I agree with the original sentiment, but have serious doubts about the latter. I meet Americans from all over when I travel.

Posted by: js at November 10, 2004 01:40 PM

TO: Damian
RE: Bigots Are US

"I maintain that soldiers are conditioned and whether they like it or not, are bigots!" -- Damian

You should have seen the race riots in the 82d (All Afro) Airborne Division.

There was this one platoon leader in one of the 505th batts who was the only white-guy in his platoon. They called him, affectionatly, "Bwahna". Biggest joke in the 3d Brigade.

But there was a certain amount of 'bigotry'. As a paratrooper in the 82d, I looked down upon any "leg" (non-airborne) soldier. And I positively despised ANYONE from the Hundred and Worst Air Assault Division.

However, the height of our bigotry was best exemplified by the riot that took place at Andrews AFB during the '71 May Day riots in DC. I swear.....

....it was 3000 82d Airborne Division paratroopers versus the same number of some regiment of Marines (Happy B-Day, Bozos). There was more head-knocked that night at Andrews then all the silliness that happened in DC for several days.

Now THAT'S 'bigotry'.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Godspeed to the GIrines (and legs) in Fallujah. I'll tip one for you today.....]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 01:41 PM

TO: js
RE: It's Only a Matter of Time

"Put a tourist in any country for an extended period of time and of course they will have more interaction with the locals than one passing through for a week. But the only real difference is really the amount of time they spend there." -- js

Yeah. There IS a big difference between passing through, in a few days vs. several years.

Something about living the life, I suspect. In a few days you might be there for some festival, but you won't see the people on a daily basis. Won't get a chance to sing their everyday songs, drink their everyday beer, eat their everyday food, dance their everyday dance....throughout the course of several years.

What's the difference, eh? Between a "flash in the pan" and "living the life"?

It's only a matter of time.....

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[If I've sung your songs, drank your beer and danced your dances, it's harder for me to hate you.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 01:46 PM

Except for the obligatory European vacation after college or later trips to the Bahamas and Jamaica, most American leftists have never really been outside the United States.

As a matter of fact, I think many like me who served and then studied, worked and lived abroad (particularly in the waning days of the Cold War) became MORE hawkish as a result of the experience. It is conservatism borne of experience rather than slogans.

As a matter of fact, I would put good money on the proposition that more people on the Right in the United States than on the Left have real experience abroad. This isn't to say many leftists and liberals wouldn't be found among the civilians and military who have studied, worked and served overseas, but it seems obvious they are in the minority. That would make a great poll question for someone who conducts legitimate polls these days (assuming there is anyone).

Posted by: jay at November 10, 2004 01:49 PM

P.S. Tell me....

...how many "tourists" spend a year or more in one place, outside of the US?

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 01:50 PM

I am not sure what this thread has "morphed" into . . . but my original point stands. Red staters have just as much and probably more experience with cultures outside the United States than Blue Staters . . . and this is because more of them have served in the world wandering volunteer military over the past two decades.

Now whether that makes the Red staters more qualified in world affairs than the Blue staters, I don't know. But I feel pretty damn confident that we can be just as snobby about is as they can.

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 02:25 PM

TO: David
RE: Time Factor

"...more of them have served in the world wandering volunteer military over the past two decades." -- David

Actually....it's three-plue decades.

VOLAR (Volunterr Army) went into effect in '70. I know. I was there.....in AIT at the time the drill sergeant announce we didn't need a pass to go into town.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
P.S. A fine time was had by all.

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 02:37 PM

P.P.S. We were hanging out in a brothel. Keeping an eye on the rest of the platoon.

My buddy and I were leaning against the jukebox looking over songs to play when one of the ladies came up and asked my friend if he wanted to have a good time.

He replied, "You play chess?"

I fell on the floor laughing at her expression.

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 02:52 PM

Hmmmm, did anybody look up the meaning of the word bigot? It seems to me that we are all bigots.....top of the class to Max who seems to have succeeded in starting a rant from a one liner....maybe I helped but I did not originaly use the word..LOL...who cares!

I stand by what I said.

I went through Checkpoint Charlie in May of '90, many times. I stayed in west Berlin for a week and went to "east" Berlin every day driving a car I had rented from Amsterdam. Being in the East knocked my socks off, seeing all the bullet holes in the historic buildings and literally being able to buy whatever I wanted....there was not much on sale....but I had enormous bundles of Ostmarks and we drank many martini cocktails in the "best" hotels and ate the best pickeled crap they had to offer. From there we went to Dresden and Weimar and leipzig and had to report to the police every day to get a stamp in our passports. We had to get a visa for czechslovakia, or however you spell it, in East Berlin,,,so we went there. It wasn't full of Americans at that stage and I managed to get fined for trying to bring a czech girl to our state appointed apartment. We drove to Yugoslavia, the Istrian peninsula and stayed in Rovinj where we met waiters who were ready to kill their fellow countrymen...I had no idea about the whole Kosova Serb thing at that stage..still don't!!!

Anyway, I did the trip while it was still behind the Iron curtain.....it was a bit of an eye opener......and I wasn't in the military, it was all off my own back....I thought it was important to do!

Posted by: Damian at November 10, 2004 03:04 PM

Chuck,

You are correct of course . . . for some reason I blocked out the 70s . . . or since I was in high school during that time, maybe I was in toooo much of a haze - LOL

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 03:08 PM

I was a New Jersey raised liberal white kid when I joined the military. I`ve spent 8 years in Japan. Traveled to every country in Asia all the way to India and had 2 6 month deployments to the middle East. I worked in a Japanese restaurant for no pay just for kicks. Learned the language and married a Japanese girl who makes kimonos by hand.

I am a conservative now and all I want to do is move back to the US, get me a patch of land in Red country, buy a gun, and teach my wife to shoot.

We live in the greatest country in the world.

Posted by: Rob at November 10, 2004 04:19 PM

hey

i have a lot friends who served in the military and they were brought up die-hard repubs, went overseas, never watched the news, followed every order they were given, lived and breathed the pack mentality including their polticial thoughts/ideas, and will raise their kids the same way.

So I guess I can make the case via anecdotal evidence that military personnel, though doing the highest calling a republic can ask of them, vote like sheep. So I gues sit swings both ways, right?

Posted by: limbaugh at November 10, 2004 04:35 PM

There is certainly something to say for the "military overseas are not living in foreign coutries" view - I remember in the late 60's going off post at a large infantry base I had visited to use the PX (I was ASA and thus lived on the economy most of the time). We ducked into a Gasthaus, and I asked if we could move the Fussball table to get more light. The proprieter was amazed that I asked in German!
On the other hand, the kids seem to get much more foreign influence than their parents: my 9 year nephew spoke Japanese fairly well and often translated for his parents LOL!

Posted by: Oscar at November 10, 2004 04:42 PM

While I was in the Philippines we weren't allowed to go anywhere most of the time so there was a whole lot I didn't see. Still, we lived off base and had neighbors. It did help that most people spoke English. There were Filipino civilians who worked in my shop.

To try to downplay the experience as unimportant or, for that matter, similar to being a tourist, is riddiculous. Some few people are just *thick* and there's nothing to be done with them (and they seem to actually get on better, because they don't bother to worry about making cutural gaffs) but you can't live in a country, even on a military base, without exposure to real life... which tourism isn't.

No, I don't know as much about the PI as a native, but I do know a whole lot more than someone who *hasn't* lived there for two years. It's given me a much different perspective on the whole world.

I married my husband as much because he was a service brat as anything else (okay, so being in love helps) because his whole attitude about the world was more encompassing. Far moreso than the guys I went to school with.

Posted by: Julie at November 10, 2004 05:36 PM

TO: limbaugh
RE: Any...

"i have a lot friends who served in the military and they were brought up die-hard repubs,,,," -- limbaugh

...time done yourself?

Nothing like personal experience to 'broaden' one's outlook.

RE: Sheep R US?

"....military personnel, though doing the highest calling a republic can ask of them, vote like sheep. So I gues sit swings both ways, right?" -- limbaugh

I don't know many sheep that are well trained and/or skilled at killing people in such large quantities.

Where do you find such?

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Guns don't kill people. I kill people. -- US Army Airborne-Ranger-Infantry]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 05:37 PM

Killer sheep . . . ones that are smart enough to master high tech weapons and make life and death decisions under heavy fire . . . accept command and lead other sheep to victory no matter what the odds . . . improvise, adapt, overcome . . .

Yeah, where can we find some of those . . .

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 05:58 PM

TO: David
RE: Where Indeed

"Yeah, where can we find some of those . . ." -- David

Right now, a lot of them are concentrated in a place called Fallujah.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[God is alive....and airborne-ranger qualified.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 06:57 PM

P.S. As a former mortar platoon leader, I'm highly impressed with the hi-tech use of GPS for registering mortar batteries so that they don't have to range-in on targets in Fallujah.

Very impressed...indeed.

It's high-angle hell on the first salvo now.

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 07:01 PM

This is a bit off topic, but not so much if we're still ripping on clueless blue-staters:

Some idiot NY Times movie reviewer actually compared new Christmas movie "The Polar Express" to Nazi Germany's "Triumph of the Will".

Yes, you read that right. I was utterly flabbergasted. A Christmas movie for kids and they're putting it on the same level as Hitler's propaganda.

And these people wonder why they lost the election on moral values...

Posted by: Mike M at November 10, 2004 07:07 PM

Hey, they have to talk about what they know best . . . propaganda.

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 07:12 PM

TO: Mike M
RE: Not a Surprise

"Some idiot NY Times movie reviewer actually compared new Christmas movie "The Polar Express" to Nazi Germany's "Triumph of the Will"." -- Mike M

Someone opened a thread on Bill Maher's blog about whether or not it's okay to kill Republicans.

At this point in time, would it be morally defensible to apply a "final solution" to republicans?

Why not equate a Christmas film with a Nazi one, merely more sauce for the 'goose'.

As I said earlier....projection.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 07:17 PM

P.S. Considering that the other day some high school students took a baseball bat to a fellow student, because he was a Republican, can actual murder be far behind?

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 07:24 PM

The left has never been willing to recognize the fact that left wing dictators have killed their fair share of people too . . .

Posted by: David at November 10, 2004 07:38 PM

Somebody needs to tell limbaugh about how to spot those killer sheep. It could be fatal if he can't tell the next time he gets the urge for wooly lovin'.

Posted by: toddk at November 10, 2004 07:54 PM

TO: toddk
RE: A Monty Python Moment

"Somebody needs to tell limbaugh about how to spot those killer sheep." -- toddk

He should start packing one of those grenades they make in Antioch.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Nasty, wicked sheep with sharp nashing teeth and a bhad disposition. They'll break your bleed'n bone, boy'o.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 10, 2004 08:28 PM

I was in Berlin five months before the wall fell, in early June of 1989.

I was there during the Tienanmen Square Massacre, an event that reverberated across Berlin.

The West Berlin TV stations covered the story intensely. The East Berlin station didn't mention it at all...the CBS of it's time, I guess.

The people of East Berlin knew about the story anyway from watching the western channels. I was in East Berlin the day after the massacre and the people there looked even grimmer than usual, the Vopos more dangerous than usual.

As I passed through Checkpoint Charlie for what turned out to be the last time, it was unimaginable that the wall would be gone within a few months.

Amazing.

Posted by: charlie eklund at November 10, 2004 08:52 PM

I'm laughing at the left-wingers again as they respond to this thread. Cornered and taunted about hubris borne of ignorance, they now decry Red State overseas experience as superficial. So it doesn't count, see, to have been in the military or to have worked for the government. What counts is a six-week bike trip around Western Europe.

No wonder people laugh at these assholes, and they are too clueless to even hear it.

Posted by: jay at November 10, 2004 09:34 PM

You don’t even have to leave the continental U.S. to have a dramatic experience of another culture. In 1962, my 15-year-old brother had been taking guitar lessons from a woman in California who was half Hawaiian and half Hopi. That summer she arranged for us (my brother and mom and me) to spend two weeks living on the Hopi reservation outside Flagstaff Arizona.

The Hopi villages sit on three mesas each of which stand six or seven hundred feet above the surrounding desert, in the middle of the Navajo reservation. We drove about three hours from Flagstaff to get there, then spent another 45 minutes slowly climbing the switchback road up to the village. We stayed in the modern house of one of the village elders, but most of the community still lived in the traditional stone and mortar homes they’d been maintaining for centuries. Many of those did have some modern conveniences: framed doors and some double-hung windows. There were a couple of radios, and the village had electricity, so a few of the homes had electric lights and freezers.

We watched a few ceremonies that were open to visiting tourists, but because we were guests, we stayed on the mesas for the entire two weeks, and had some long conversations with people who were life-long friends of my brother’s teacher. One day we were taken to a promontory where a gap of about twenty feet separated the main mesa from a splinter. Some 300 feet below lay a heap of skeletons. We were told they were the bodies of Hopi who had died of smallpox from infected blankets given them by the U.S. Army many years earlier.

Forty years later, I see those two weeks provided more vivid insight than any other experience in my life, as to how different our “western european-industrialized” culture is from the experiences of other people.

You can travel extensively and still be a bigoted, ignorant, parochial turd. And you can spend most of your life in one city, and yet learn to look at the world with an understanding that transcends the limits of your neighborhood. If you can’t venture beyond the limits of your own attitudes, it makes no difference how extensively you might travel.

Posted by: David March, animator&fiddler at November 10, 2004 11:33 PM

I'm an Air Force brat. My dad was a pilot in WWII, Korea, and Viet Nam. I grew up everywhere. Born in Newfoundland when my dad was stationed at Gander, first memories are fo Aurora CO, where we lived when my dad was an instructor pilot at the Air Force Academy, went to Ft. Walton Beach FL, and then Panama (Deep sea fishing every weekend when you're 9-10 years old is, like, the most healthy way to live a kid could have). Stateside again, it was OK-city OK, then Tacoma WA. Moved to Japan after that, right smack dab in the middle of the Viet Nam war. I rebelled and went liberal for several years, but it was comparing what liberals said being an American meant with what I lived growing up - what I saw "other countries" were - that made call BS. Anyone who does not realize that the US is the most benevolent hyper-power in history - who doesn't understand what we've done to shape the world for the better - is such a supernaturally out of touch imbicile that... Well. I'm thankful in the extreme that I had the childhood I did. I knew more about the REAL way the world is at 12 than all the moonbats in the universe do now.

Posted by: Bloghorn Bleghorn at November 11, 2004 12:05 AM

In the Navy... (where did that singing come from?) I traveled the world, but can't say I saw much of it. I did see Guam, Toyko and the Phillipines. (Homer-esque moan. MMMMM Phillipines.) As well as Ft Lauderdale. But despite covering half the globe, did not get a chance to see much of it. Submarines are not big on tourist visuals.

Join the Navy and see the world. 75 pecent of the world is covered in water, and water looks the same no matter where you go. In a submarine, you don't even get a chance to see the water :)

Posted by: Ben at November 11, 2004 02:06 AM

It never ceases to amaze me how much people try and shove everyone in the convenient box.

18 years of being in the military, and having *lived* in Japan, Turkey, Germany and England has taught me that everyone in this thread is right. To a point. JS says that the “depth of understanding remains relatively superficial” and he is right for some of them. I had a roommate in Germany that I lived with for 8 months, and in all that time I can only confirm him leaving the base (Patch Barracks in Stuttgart) twice. On Thanksgiving and Christmas and he visited military families. I would say that he didn’t have much of an international experience. And he certainly fit Damian’s idea that they live in an “American version” of Germany. But for every “stay in the room” guy there was a guy that “went native” on us and there was every shade in between.

I’m also not certain I would agree on the original hypothesis. There is truth to the idea that Americans who travel obtain a much better appreciation of just how great our country is. But I have met a large number of “liberal” folks who have traveled as extensively as I, and in most cases they are like JS and really immersed themselves in the culture that they lived in. I have a friend who is just returning from Belgium after accompanying her husband while he taught at a university, and her experience in Europe far exceeds my own. She even got pregnant and did the whole thing through the local medical services.

Mostly I am just sick of everyone being so divided in this country. Speaking as a hard core moderate that didn’t like either candidate but has belief that the overall system of government in our nation will let us weather this political storm, I just want to say quit being so “we’re better than they are”. We are all citizens of the greatest nation the Earth has ever seen, lets pull it together and be a little more civil to each other.

Posted by: Ed C at November 11, 2004 02:48 AM

Living abroad, even in a comparatively sheltered environment like in the military, is an experience. But it remains a largely superficial one that does not significantly increase one's understanding of another culture. (Knowledge yes, understanding no)

Germans, for example, are "Weltmeisters" in traveling and most have been to a dozen or more countries. The USA is a favored destination. I bet a much larger proportion of Germans have been to the USA than vice versa in spite of the major US military bases here. But: Do the Germans understand why Bush was re-elected? No. Do Americans understand why many Germans think America is the greatest danger to world peace at the moment? No. Travel and exposure to a foreign culture is not equal to understanding a foreign culture. Understanding is what counts in my book.

Most of you will have to trust me on this, but unless you've really lived completely in a foreign culture with little to no exposure to your own culture for a while, you will probably never understand the real differences - and maybe not even then. Few have lived that way and there is a real difference between the two types of experiences. (Not that one ever shakes off the influence of one's own culture. I'm still shaking my head in amazement that Germans are actually protesting en masse against the modest labor reforms that have been proposed so far.)

Posted by: js at November 11, 2004 03:07 AM

I think we are trying to compare apples and pears.
Who is more traveled red or blue?
One would have to say red, because of the military. Though I must agree with js, that many on those base stay in the American area. This includes outside of the base. Maybe it's just here in Germany, but the are more than enough Pizza Huts and Mcd's and they all speak english and have english menus. Living on a base or even near it is not the same as living in a foreign country.
Understand is different than living. Being a conservative or liberal is different that being a Democrat or Republican. I personally believe there are more conservatives in the US than than liberals. But when you change the label to D/R those numbers change.
I find it interesting that people in Europe agree political with liberals, but have probably met more conservatives through business and military. In fact, most people in Europe no nothing about the views of conservatives even though they have met many of them.

On the side, do those on the bases have to sort there garbage to the same extent as those of us not? That is an experience on its own.

Posted by: Amani at November 11, 2004 04:39 AM

"Living abroad, even in a comparatively sheltered environment like in the military, is an experience. But it remains a largely superficial one that does not significantly increase one's understanding of another culture. (Knowledge yes, understanding no)"

The first step toward understanding something is obtaining knowledge about it. If this is not true, why does the left constantly harp about how "ignorant" the right is about . . . well, about everything?

Obtaining knowledge through actual experience is obviously superior to obtaining knowledge through second hand accounts.

Surely "book learning" is a plus, but in case you didn't know, the left doesn't have the monopoly on "book learning" either.

Advanced degrees are the norm in the officer corps (Indeed required for promotion above the company grade level), and senior NCOs get their fair share of college degrees as well. And, interestingly enough, one of the most popular degrees in the military is in International Relations.

So I still maintain that military members are in a better position to understand foreign cultures than the vast majority of non-military members. Do they ALL take the opportunity to learn and understand about the cultures they come in contact with? No, of course not, but not all liberal tourists on a 7 Day Bus Tour of Europe get to either.

I, for one, lived in Germany for six years and travelled to Japan, Korea and the PI. I toured Europe and had more than my fair share of professional and personal contacts with my foreign counterparts and their families. I attended training and/or worked with officers from Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, India, Italy, Germany, France, Canada, Spain, Israel, Great Britian, Korea, Japan, Australia, and so many other nations I can't even begin to remember.

Do I have an in-depth understanding of their respective cultures? No, I suppose I do not (With the exception of their drinking rituals . . . I think I understand those quite well), but I am pretty confident that I know more about them than some kid from Berkeley.


Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 05:24 AM

Pro-life, Christian, conservative-libertarian here. I voted for Bush in both 00 and 04. Odd, that I have a Masters in Liberal Arts. Odd, that I have--on my own, with no military experience--travelled to twenty-two countries to-date. I have done so solely to learn.

Pardon me whilst I sip my ice tea, pick my teeth with a toothpick, pack my skoal, and read The Atlantic Monthly. I love the smell of Skoal in morning.

Posted by: Dragon Fly at November 11, 2004 08:17 AM

TO: js and Amani
RE: No Argument....

....with the idea that if you don't go out into the world, from some cocoonesque US enclave, that you won't learn much about the world. This thread does not argue that.

The point of this thread is that liberals, who seem to think they have a monopoly on being more worldly are probably far from that, compared with conservatives. One important reason being they have not done time in the military and therefore have not travelled as much as the military have. Therefore, the liberals have less exposure to the real world than do conservatives.

To emphasis Dragon Fly's points, the liberals seem to think they have a monopoly on education as well. You can verify this by reading recent comments to that affect by Jane Smiley et al; "unteachable ignorance". Moi?

However, the truth of the matter is that the rates of education in both camps are roughly comperable.

So, we see the so-called liberals demonstrating their own ignorance and their own, apparent, unteachability. And they are PROUD of both, to boot.

Where I come from, that's the definition of "stupidity".

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[Ignorance is when you don't know something. Stupidity is ignorance with pride.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 11, 2004 08:45 AM

TO: Dragon Fly
RE: Skoal?

For me, it's caffine (coffee), nicotine (cigars) and diesel fumes (armored combat vehicle exhaust), as the sun comes up and sitting on the hood of my jeep looking over the map.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 11, 2004 08:48 AM

Not to get off topic, but they are about to fly Arafat's mostly dead body out of France.

Wouldn't it be ironic if it was hijacked by terrorists?

Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 09:12 AM

It is always a treat to watch conservative elitists snap at liberal elitists.
Is it posible to set up a Rove / Moore steel cage match to the death? The winner could eat the loser.
(Of course, what I would really like to see is Powell and Rummy in the Thunderdome.)

Posted by: Kiril at November 11, 2004 09:26 AM

As an Army-brat and a Red-stater, I'm just continuing in my dad's footsteps, sort of. He was born in a small town in Alabama (Barbour County by the way, Polly). His travels began in high school when, as junior, he and a buddy decided to hitch-hike/walk to Hattiesburg, Miss.(no small feat in the 1940's) to try to walk-on the Southern Miss football team. Didn't work out, but on the way back, they worked alongside German POWs on a potato farm. Then at Auburn in joined ROTC, became an aviator, and saw the world. In 27 years of active duty he had 28 different assignments; including Germany, Korea, Italy, Vietnam (3 times), and Iran. This was interspersed with stateside homes in Oklahoma, Georgia, Texas, Hawaii, Kansas, and then finally back to Alabama (Ft. Rucker). I was born in Italy and we still have friends (non-military non American) that we still keep in touch with. My office at home contains a hand made wooden desk from a good German friend of my dad. And I have found memories of living in Germany and traveling in our Ford Falcon van to France and Spain for summer vacations. I remember a Spainish kid my age I played with one summer, neither of us knowing any of the other's language.
Now I have traveled since been grown. To Mexico, Belize, Guatamala, France, Germany, Italy, Hungary, the then Czechoslovakia, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Poland, and most of the U.S. states east of the Rockies (yes, even some blue ones). When people learn that I grew up in Alabama, they expect me to be a hick, an ignorant yokel. And maybe they are surprised to learn that, yes, I can read and, no, I did not marry my sister. I think my friend, Hans, an exchange student from Holland in my senior class of high school, would be the first to dismiss the stereotype of "red-staters" and especially Southerners as being unworldly, ignorant, whathaveyou, and tell you that is utterly wrong.
I have now forgotten my point in originally starting this post, and I have to pee really bad. so, thanks for listening.

Posted by: John W. at November 11, 2004 09:44 AM

Hell, I am not trying to be an "elitist" . . . I just want the left to admit we aren't intellectually or otherwise challenged just because we disagree with them. We win that battle and maybe, just maybe things can get better.

Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 09:48 AM

TO: David
RE: Fat Chance

"...I am not trying to be an "elitist" . . . I just want the left to admit we aren't intellectually or otherwise challenged..." -- David

About as much as Nixon-Kissenger had of getting the North Vietnamese to admit they had regular forces working south of the DMZ in '70.

It would destroy their sense of moral superiority and without that carefully constructed facade their perceived position would be known to all as a sham. Then they would REALLY need therapy.

Of course, they could always turn to Christ for that kind of help. But they'd probably think that as being the worst of all possible evils. [Note: I wonder why..... Maybe that's some sort of indicator.]

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[No Jesus, No Peace.
Know Jesus, Know Peace.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 11, 2004 10:01 AM

Oh, and by the way. I would just like to add to my previous post the following: I am the first member of my family to graduate from high school. And oddly enough, I am the only registered Republican in that same family. (please understand, I am not making fun of my family, just highlighting how "Red State" stereotypes explode upon further examination.)

Chuck, my favorite is having a mouth full Skoal in board meeting. Giddy up, cowboy.

Posted by: Dragon Fly at November 11, 2004 10:33 AM

--and I have to pee really bad.--

Gee, John, thanks for sharing.

Posted by: Sandy P at November 11, 2004 11:09 AM

From AOL News:

Michael Moore plans a follow-up to "Fahrenheit 9/11," his hit documentary that assails President Bush over the handling of the Sept. 11 attacks and the war on terrorism, according to a Hollywood trade paper.

Moore told Daily Variety that he and Harvey Weinstein, the Miramax boss who produced the film, hope to have "Fahrenheit 9/11 1/2" ready in two to three years.

"Fifty-one percent of the American people lacked information (in this election) and we want to educate and enlighten them," Moore was quoted in Thursday's edition of Variety. "They weren't told the truth. We're communicators and it's up to us to start doing it now

There are few things I love more than being "educated and enlightened" by the left . . . getting a root canal is one of them . . .

Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 01:46 PM

Will,

Just keep me in the Wiregrass Area.

Ken

Posted by: Ken at November 11, 2004 02:58 PM

TO: David
RE: (Re)Education Facilities Are Being Planned

"There are few things I love more than being "educated and enlightened" by the left . . ." -- David

Why am I reminded of the way drive-in theaters were used in Red Dawn?

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 11, 2004 03:12 PM

Moore is my new hero (no I don't want to be like him, but I do admire him). He has the soul-less marketing machine thing down pat. God bless him for keeping the kids amused and giving them something to spend their allowances on.

Posted by: aaron at November 11, 2004 03:14 PM

Moore the socialist is the king of capitalist marketing . . . only in America . . .

Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 04:59 PM

TO: David
RE: As Simon & Garfunkle Sang It...

"Moore the socialist is the king of capitalist marketing..." -- David

All lies and jest. Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 11, 2004 05:04 PM

You guys bragging about your military time overseas have forgotten about a group of Americans who have all spent real time overseas, directly interacting with the locals all the time.

Virtually all Mormon men, and now a lot of Mormon women, have spent two years overseas knocking on doors and talking to the locals. And we can see from the Utah voting results what a "blue" group they are...

Posted by: Curt at November 11, 2004 08:14 PM

TO: Curt
RE: Heck...

Anyplace outside of Utah is 'foreign' to Mormons. ;-)

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[I hate driving in Utah. Everybody acts like they're going to go to heaven when they die.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 11, 2004 08:41 PM

Curt,

You miss the point of the whole thread. First of all, we aren't bragging about anything . . . if we recall our military experiences fondly, you will just have to excuse us. I am sure you guys recall those rousing times of ministering to the pagan foreigners with equal fondness.

But the main thing we (Well, me at least) were doing was pointing out the fact that the Blue staters don't hold a monopoly on foreign experience.

That being said, and with all due respect, if the rest of the world hides from you guys when you knock on the door like us Americans, I can't see you actually getting to talk to many of them.

Just teasing you, man . . .

Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 08:45 PM

Curt,
Crud, I was just about to post that thought. I was going to do so last night, but was too tired to type coherently. I know (or knew) folks who served various Mormon missions in Germany, Brazil, the Dominican Republic, another one who served in a mission that covered a chunk of the Caribbean, New Zealand, Japan, Scotland, England, and the Philipines. These are just off the top of my head. Other denominations also send their members out to various places around the world. They don't stay in America Lite, they live among the people who they're trying to convert or help, and I daresay they know more about the people they lived with than that proverbial Berkley kid.

Posted by: Don at November 11, 2004 08:46 PM

I just re-read Curt's post and I was wrong in saying he missed the point of the thread . . . but I still like the rest of my post - LOL

Sorry, Curt

Posted by: David at November 11, 2004 08:53 PM

Chuck,
Outside of Utah is foreign territory for most Utahns, not just the local Mormons. :-)

David,
I hide under the bed whenever a missionary of any stripe knocks on the door too. No hard feelings from me, though I didn't interpret Curts post as perhaps harshly as you did.

Point remains, though, while the Mormon church is perhaps the best known, a number of other faiths send people out of the country. I get the impression that these other missionaries tend to come from the red states too.

Posted by: Don at November 11, 2004 08:58 PM

TO: Don
RE: The Locals

"Outside of Utah is foreign territory for most Utahns, not just the local Mormons. :-)" -- Don

Just warn me when you're going out onto the highways near where I live. ;-)

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[I want to die in my sleep, just like my grandfather...not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 12, 2004 05:54 AM

In the years I studied and eventually worked abroad, never in any sort of cocoon, I noticed something odd about American left-wingers who lived overseas. Many if not most American leftists first condescended towards the nationals, and eventually came to loathe and criticize them (much of this was in the Third World). I write this not out of spite but simply as an observation.

In many ways, American left-wingers' bad behavior in this country only grew worse overseas. The United States military personnel, government workers, and clergy I encountered tended to be more conservative than civilian employees and students--and more accepting of other cultures and peoples. This runs counter to stereotype, but was what I observed.

Posted by: jay at November 12, 2004 06:32 AM

TO: jay
RE: That's Interesting

"Many if not most American leftists first condescended towards the nationals, and eventually came to loathe and criticize them (much of this was in the Third World). I write this not out of spite but simply as an observation.

In many ways, American left-wingers' bad behavior in this country only grew worse overseas." -- jay

Very interesting report, indeed.

Any corroborating reports?

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 12, 2004 07:13 AM

Chuck,

My experience was in Southeast Asia. I too would like to hear from others who lived and worked abroad in a civilian environment and if they witnessed what I did, particularly in the Thirld World and developing nations. The left-wing condescension, which eventually became hostility, towards the citizens of the nations where I worked was horrible. The leftists simply weren't appreciated enough by those they sought to defend, so hate bubbled to the surface. I'll leave it there.

Posted by: jay at November 12, 2004 09:12 AM

I read the alternative history series, Island in The Sea of Time, by S.M. Sterling, a few years ago and it jumped to mind after reading Jay's post.

The story was about how the people of the Island of Nantucket reacted when their little Island was mysteriously transported back several hundred years in history and they had to actually deal with "ancient" cultures from a modern perspective.

In the story, there was an extremely liberal subset of the Island's population that railed against any attempt at "changing" the indigenous people of the world during contact with the modern intruders. They also fought tooth and nail against any attempt to establish a defense against attack by these people. They argued that these people could not possibly be dangerous (and indeed were no doubt more enlightened) since they were not poisoned by the modern world.

Their certainty in their own noble view outweighed any practical survival considerations and, in the end, they killed a few of their fellow Islanders, stole scarce supplies, commandeered a ship, and headed down to Central America to bond with the "ancient" inhabitants.

Of course, things did not work out like they anticipated. The indigenous people welcomed them with open arms, put them at ease, and then promptly killed them all save for leader who they then used for (a very disturbing) human sacrifice.

And even as their leader was being sacrificed, she still could not understand how she and her followers were not appreciated.

Sounds like the left to me . . .

Posted by: David at November 12, 2004 11:11 AM

I noticed that back packing in Europe. Rich liberals treated servers and staff like shit. They also ran their mouths and were loud and obnixious. Some were Canadian (but without their maple leaves).

Posted by: aaron at November 12, 2004 11:12 AM

Great point, Will. I should've thought of it.

In my unofficial polling in Bulgaria and France, I've found that most progressives who travelled have done it from the hotel suite.

Get them *living* overseas, and see what happens.

Posted by: jkrank at November 12, 2004 11:32 AM

How "servants" are treated is another issue. I was involved in a rather lengthy debate about servants or maids, and the left, understandibly, argued that free people should do their own "dirty work" and that hiring people to do distasteful tasks was demeaning to them. And I could sypathize with looking down at people who refused to do something so low as touch a toilet (and Prince Harry is going to have to clean his now, won't he.)

The righties in the conversation saw nothing inherently demeaning in doing the dirty work, as work is work. They also saw nothing particularly noble in doing it themselves.

But you have to wonder, really, if the reason that lefties consider service work demeaning is because, perhaps subconsciously, they demean the people who do it.

(Kerry calling his bodybguard and SOB for wiping out on a snowboard was *significant* to me, because it illustrated just exactly this kind of attitude.)

Posted by: Julie at November 12, 2004 11:55 AM

David, Aaron, and Julie all to some extent described what I witnessed. It seemed that after the locals declined to be dazzled by the leftists, or to follow their dictates (usually in the form of paternalistic advice), the native population was suddenly deemed unworthy. It was very ugly.

And yes, Canadian left-wingers were just as bad as American leftists. And again, this was nowhere near as bad among the service members and the right-of-center businessmen, clergy and government workers (remember, this was the 80's). After I left the Pacific, it made perfect sense to me why I always disliked leftists, and why the local populations laughed at them and despised them.

I would like to hear other accounts, as this is something that stayed with me two decades.

Posted by: jay at November 12, 2004 05:10 PM

To clarify/correct what I wrote above, the right-of-center military and civilians I encountered tended to be more accepting of the different peoples and cultures than the American left-wingers. Too much booze and too little time accounted for the error...or so I tell myself.

Posted by: jay at November 12, 2004 11:16 PM

I lived and worked for 2 years in Milan, Italy as an english teacher. It was one of the best experiencs of my life. I love the Italian people, they are passionate, dramatic, and love just hanging out with family and friends.

However, I heard on a regular basis more racial slurs in one week there than one would hear in a lifetime here in the states.
They would call the French "little stinkies", make remarks about the fat, greedy Germans and actually talk about their Jewish "friends" and coworkers behind their backs. And don't even get me started about how they regard the immigrants from Africa.

Learn tolerance from Europeans? It is to laugh.

Posted by: Bald Eagle at November 13, 2004 12:10 AM

When I think of France, I don't think of tolerance - LOL

And now that I think on it, that is true for Europe as a whole. I don't recall the Germans being particularly tolerant of immigrants when I was stationed there . . . including their new East German countrymen.

Posted by: David at November 13, 2004 07:31 AM

i would simply add that JUST BEING a serviceman (without even going anywhere) tends to make your international awareness more ACUTE... for OBVIOUS reasons ~ not even necessarily in places of conflict...

example: the week after i signed up to serve in the US ARMY as a RUSSIAN speaking linguist, RUSSIA signed a HUGE economic deal with IRAQ (this was late summer 2002) and you BET i sat up and took notice...

RUSSIA immediately played it down, denying the initial US suggestions that the deal was worth 40-60 million dollars and that it would violate the UN sanctions... well, the IRAQI ambassador to RUSSIA was quick to confirm it and said that the deal was worth 40 BILLION (not million, you silly AMERICANS) in only 5 years!

Khalaf (the IRAQI ambassador) added "We couldn't care less what the U.S. thinks about it ... let America bring its own house into order." this whole deal was just another slap in the face, to both the UN as well as the US...

this was AFTER 9/11 but BEFORE the US started to apply real pressure on IRAQ to readmit the UN inspectors...

best part is, this was something that was quickly forgotten (if not outright ignored) by 99% of americans... what did it have to do with them? well, remember the UN security council vote on IRAQ? it was no big suprise to those who actually PAYED ATTENTION...

now, would i have noticed anyways, being a linguist, yes, but it MEANT something to me personally now, so i spent a lot of time considering how it could affect US relations w/ RUSSIA...

i'm from a US "RED STATE", have been to RUSSIA and travelled there extensively (even before my service)... and the economic deal i mentioned was only the TIP of the RUSSIAN/IRAQI iceberg...

Posted by: REN at November 13, 2004 12:38 PM

I went over to the Democratic Underground (After dressing in the appropriate HAZMAT protective clothing.)and looked over their "Salute to Veterans" comments.

It seems there are hundreds of combat vets that are dedicated members of DU.

Assuming that these people actually served in the military (I have no evidence they didn't so we must accept it at face value.), I guess it proves that the military is certainly not owned by the conservatives in our nation. That is a good thing, since it is heartening to know that Americans on both the left and the right understand the importance of serving their country.

But I wonder how they could have served with their conservative brothers in arms and still hold such an intolerant view towards those of "Red state" persuasion.

But then I remember what Kerry said and did . . .

Posted by: David at November 13, 2004 01:42 PM

Writing of the 19th Century historian Frederich Turner, H.W. Brands made a telling comment that was as true 100 years ago as today. "Proponents of the New England school (the germ of our country's course was set in olde Europe)had long held that the real America lay within 100 miles of Boston; Turner argued just the opposite. The real America, he said, existed beyond the first range of mountains, in the river valleys and on the prairies and plains of the West."

So we see that the arguments of big city vs. rural America go on and on. It seems America is still found beyond 100 miles of Boston, and New York (and San Francisco).

Posted by: Roger at November 13, 2004 05:17 PM

jean-paul: It is not correct to say that George W. Bush had never left the USA before he ran for president. He had traveled to Mexico, Canada, China, Egypt, France, Gambia, Israel, Italy, and the UK. See the URL below.

Posted by: Joshua at November 13, 2004 06:34 PM

I'm grew up inside the Seventh Ring of Jesusland (oops, sorry, Midland, Texas) myself but managed to see a bit of the world on Uncle Sam.

Before that, my dad made sure we knew about most of the western states via the annual two week RV safari.

Where did the I go with the Marines? Okinawa for a year (less three months in Korea during the winter). California. Oklahoma (twice). Two WesPacs, hitting ports from Adak in the Aleutians to the coast of India, Korea twice (met and stayed with a Korean vet who fought with my uncle in '51; also met the PM of India while he shopped in Itae Won), Philippines multiple times (clap, rock throwing monkeys, eating the bounty of the jungle, more clap, built two orphanages, heat stroke, got stabbed by a bar girl while on SP, Hong Kong twice (unplanned, unscheduled, unauthorized op with the RM's on customs patrol - I bought a beer in Canton!), Penang Maylasia, Thailand twice (week in Bangkok, three days on walkabout with a monk, learned how to shift an elephant into reverse), Singapore twice (did SP with Mr. Singh and Mr. Singh of the Singapore Detectives the first time, got my dick run into the ground by the Royal Ghurka's on the Seven Hills the next time around. Spoke education with a streetcorner Socrates who taught Chinese orchestra, classical music, and penmanship), Australia (85 - World Cup!; the rest of the visit struck me as much like Texas without the oil smell and with bigger rabbits), Jordan for a week (met Capt. Abbey; great guy), walked with the Masai (briefly - more rock throwing monkeys but they also do body slams) and a MAC hop tour from India to Italy to Paris (never visit in a drought year; never mind that, screw Paris and hit the Med beaches away from the Riviera - Aix en Provance was heavenly) to England and to home.

I used to be able to say "please","hello","thank you","I'm sorry","very nice","where's the bathroom", "beautiful eyes", and "I'm lost" in about nine languages...but with all the Bible Indoctrination I've plumb lost about five of them. It couldn't have anything to do with age and enough different beers and distilled spirits to float a tanker, of course.

Just call me blinkered.

Posted by: TmjUtah at November 13, 2004 07:01 PM

Oh, and if anyone wants to know how the Left does in the third world, I've got three letters for you:

NGO.

I dealt with NGO's in the Philipinnes, Thailand, and strangely enough mainland Japan. I kept on waiting for the word "wog" to come up in conversation but I guess it was just assumed or that I didn't have the right language skills to catch it. It was there, just under the surface, all the time. Go figure.

Posted by: TmjUtah at November 13, 2004 07:07 PM

Shucks, I went to one uh em ferrin countries. I thank they called it Alabammy.

Posted by: Bubba at November 13, 2004 07:07 PM

I read a lot of the letters posted as of 11/13/04. it was a new view for me one I had not thought of and very realistic.
Ivory towers are evedintly easy to build and make a lot of noise.

Posted by: p doles at November 13, 2004 07:17 PM

Most of us over-educated, cosmopolitan rednecks don't think about these things, they're so much a part of our personal histories; but you're right to make a point of it. I grew up in Shreveport, La., just across the Red River from Barksdale AFB (A Strategic Air Command Headquarters--we all knew where and why Bush would be after hearing about 9/11--anyone who wonders or criticizes is just ignorant). During the mid-term of the Viet Nam conflict, people like Nguyen Kao Key (sp?) might be seen at the BX. When the end of the war was near, a Laotian princess quietly transferred into my highschool. God knows what happened to those she had to leave behind. No one made a big deal out of any of it. We were and are Americans--as good as any royalty, but also not above any worker anywhere on earth. We watched the anti-war demonstrations and sympathized with the desire for peace, but never lost sight of the fact that we had men and women in harm's way, doing work for a higher good. We couldn't lose sight of it--they were in our community and they were good people, not war criminals. Unfortunately, lots of them were disenchanted and depressed by what they had seen in Nam and even moreso by what they were confronted with by the media and in other parts of the country. If you want to find the "new" voters who sent Kerry packing, here we are--we're the ones whose beloved friends, family, neighbors, teachers, et al. he accused of being monstrous war criminals. We're everywhere and we didn't and won't forget. We are too modest and polite to claim we're smarter or better than the shrill left, but we know we're more certain in our values and we do, at least, know what we know. We understand home, family, work and what gets us to 5 o'clock (an old rule to remember which way to tighten a bolt). Truth is concrete for us--as it really is for everyone--not relative or rhetorical. M. Moore, the New York Times, Baghdad Bob and definitely the Guardian U.K. can't shake that. New York and LA aren't America's heartland and certainly aren't her true heart, mind, or soul. We aren't putting out the degenerate culture that muslims so detest about the west. Still, I don't ever expect my region or my wide social, economic, and cultural demographic to get the acknowledgment we're due from MSM or Hollywood or even the Imperial Federal Government (I'm also one of those "Hell, no I ain't forgettin'" rebs). We'll just continue to be the light on the hill and the core of political support for those who choose right (correct) over expedient. Thanks for your great work spreading the truth.

Posted by: Ayuaxe at November 13, 2004 07:20 PM

I was a GI Brat, Hawaii (when it was still a "long ways away") later Turkey & Spain. Then three years living in Germany.
Summation: some people are incurious, even about their home town. Others want to know what's the Big Deal here. E.G. My dad gawked at The Empire State Building when he got to NYC in 48, we both gawked at the Parthenon in 1970. I know I don't "know" Turkey, or Spain, as well as some, but when I'm looking at a map of the world, I'm not looking at a "map of the world" so much as a "map of places and people I've known. Leads to my saying "I know this great little Yugolsavian resturant, but it is in Salzberg."
A good rule of thumb is check behind The Cathedral. There is usually a good resturant there. :-)

tschus
pyotr

(tschus is German for "bye-bye")

Posted by: pyotr576 at November 13, 2004 08:20 PM

TO: Ayuaxe
RE: Barksdale AFB?

"I grew up in Shreveport, La., just across the Red River from Barksdale AFB..." -- Ayuaxe

Go Bearkats! Beat Woodlawn!

Regards,

Chuck(le)
P.S. Bossier City High, '69.

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 13, 2004 08:31 PM

Teresa Heinz, upon reaching Chicago, was amazed that she could 'almost live here'. It's got everything! Imagine finding such a metropolitan atmosphere miles and miles from NY or LA!

Posted by: anon at November 13, 2004 08:42 PM

Hot Dayum! It's Alabama Home Time here. My dad was Sgt. Major of the helicopter school at Ft. Rucker way back in the 50s/60's/70's - more than once. We lived "on the economy" over in my mom's hometown, Abbeville, so whenever we were stationed at Rucker, I lived among the civilians, as one of them. And yeah, we were stationed overseas (I first heard the Beatles when I was in high school in Germany.)

But you know, what's missing from this conversation is something we military brats know - because we've lived in Blue States & Red States: truth is, living north & south, east & west, Stateside - that's just like living in other countries. We brats were integrated while the civilians were segregated. We brats learned the languages, ate the food, and drank the beer, wherever we were.

Everywhere I've lived, I've found the locals to be parochial. In Manhattan - & I LOVE NYC - where my wife grew up - it's provincial. The place is full of foreigners, & the locals only seem to meet them as cab drivers & carryout providers. In Chicago, where I've been the last 30 plus years, it's the same thing. For the most part, no one lifts his eyes, Red or Blue.

Red & Blue States are not geographic - they are states of mind. There are Red Staters here in Chicago, & Blue Staters in Alabama. For the most part, I'm Red, but hey, some of my best friends are Blue...

Any brats here should check out alt.culture.military-brats, and surf on over to mililtary-brats.com. We live in the Real America - Red, White & Blue!

Posted by: harmon at November 13, 2004 08:43 PM

Folks, very interesting thread. I have some gee-whiz comments from my own military perspective. I am a “red”, so according to post-election conventional wisdom, that means I’m an uncultured, uneducated, unworldly Neanderthal. May not be to far off the mark on the culture part …

Anyway, this uneducated US Air Force Academy graduate and MBA holder has lived in Oregon, California, Nevada, Colorado, Missouri and currently lives in Texas with his Czech-citizen wife (does the 40+ states I’ve passed through or visited count?).

This unworldly hillbilly has lived overseas for 7 years: 3 years in Okinawa (Dad was in the Marines), 2 years in Tokyo and 2 more in England. In the military, I lived for weeks and sometimes months at a time in places like Germany, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Italy, Greece, Albania, Denmark, Holland, Saudi Arabia, Mozambique, Zambia and Kenya. I’ve visited about two times as many countries worldwide. As a businessman, I continue to travel to places like Singapore, France and the UK.

General observation:

1. The only anti-Americanism I’ve encountered overseas has been via the written media, and most of that has come from American sources (i.e. “guest” opinion columns).

My military observations:

1. While in the military, the foreigners I encountered were appreciative of what the US was doing for them, especially in Ukraine, Albania and throughout Africa.

2. The US government maintains many of its key lines of communication and influence throughout the world via military channels.

3. These military channels are facilitated by the State Department (DoS), but the DoS only gets involved in a cursory way: most of the key work is done through the US military attaches and their host nation counterparts (see 4 below for why this is).

4. The DoS budget doesn’t come close to that of the Dept of Defense (DoD). DoS funds are especially scarce in places like Africa, East Europe and most of Asia.

5. The US military combatant commanders (most of them “uneducated, uncultured, and unworldly” i.e. they’re “red”) and their subordinate commanders maintain these links by spending $$ on training, conducting exercises and “fixing stuff” that the host nations can’t afford to do on their own.

So what does all this mean? It means that the folks pursuing a lot of official American interests overseas are military professionals. Most of the diplomacy is done by general officers. And these guys and gals are typically a conservative bunch. By law, they’re educated (officers need at least a bachelor’s degree, but most field- and flag-grade officers have one or more masters degrees as a requirement for promotion). They’re all experienced in diplomacy and know how to control manpower, budgets and war material. They know how to “wheel and deal” in Congress (budget battles) and they know US Govt strategy. But above all, most of these generals still think of the America as the “city on the hill” and love their country enough to die for it. Who better to represent our government and work in an official manner with other world governments?

Posted by: 12 lictors at November 13, 2004 09:27 PM

I've always thought that Democrats rely too much on uninformed voters who are pliable to unions and "leaders" like Jesse Jackson, the American Arafat. There are two kinds of Democrats, those who think they are intellectually superior and have a natural right to rule, and those who think the party is still the party of the working man, the poor and minorities. They have been successful because they bought votes with promises of more programs, but when the party became beholden to feminists and environmentalists they could no longer oppose support even sensible limits on abortion and are often on the opposite side from people who want jobs, domestic oil and gas, and other middle-class necessities. Their old base is breaking up, because they have taken the votes of unionmembers, blacks and hispanics for granted, while they pandered to the "intellectuals" whose issues were often contrary to the moral values of those voting blocs they didn't think they had to compete for anymore.


Posted by: AST at November 13, 2004 09:28 PM

first about being bigoted there's several places around europe that come to mind about the ultimate in bigotry, namely, aushwitz, treblinka, buchanwald, among the many. every one should should be made to visit these places and feel the eerieness(if a word)and let the moment wash over you. i did while stationed over there in the army during the 80's. makes one think about where they live and certainly glad my mom and grandfather/grandmother emigrated to this place. and yes i wasn't a barracks rat like some and tried to visit every place i could on my time off.
second growing up in probably most bigoted place in boston kinda gives you a perspective firsthand about it. especially during the busing riots in the 70's. it made me think and yes my answer was to get out and see the world and yes even learn a foreign language different from highschool french and dead latin. makes me glad i was in the army it was by far the highlight of my years and would do in a new york minute if they ley me. bigots abound everywhere, yet its the ones who call those who don't see it their way first from my recollections.

and me being only a "DAT"

LIVE LARGE!

Posted by: morigu at November 13, 2004 11:13 PM

A few facts and figures according to a survey of 5,983 Military Brats: (approximately 52% of respondents are 45+ years or older).
45% have a valid passport (compared to about 19-21% of the overall US Population).

48% of the men, and 38% of the women lean "red" while only 19% of the men lean "blue" and 28% of the women. The combined total is 42% "red" and 25% "blue".

73% of the men vote in all elections, while 62% of the women vote.

You can do the math as to which way the majority votes.
Full survey is available at military-brats.com

Posted by: Marc at November 14, 2004 12:00 AM

To blue-state elitists who think red-state hillbillies have never been anywhere: Shame on you, you self-righteous nitwits!! Like Vodkapundit, I'm from Colorado Springs. I went to an elite college in Massachusetts. You wouldn't believe how provincial those people were. Most had no idea of how life is in the West. In fact, most hadn't even given a thought to the fact that it might be different from New England, because they usually didn't think beyond the next weekend trip to Dartmouth anyway.

To those commenters here who seem to think the military experience overseas is less valid than their own: Get over yourselves. You are demonstrating your ignorance.

I've lived abroad twice(once without the military and once with), and been an exchange student in France. I've met Americans overseas of all politcal persuasions and decided you really get out of an experience what you put into it. I'm not sure politics or where you came from back home has a lot to do with it. As many military families go native as stick to the base, and plenty of civilian ex-pats associate only with other ex-pats at endless drunken gripe-fests. I'm just as sickened by people who've lived abroad for 30 years and can't speak the language as I am by people who've just arrived and are fluent in it, but can't manage to say anything good about America.

Most Americans arrive abroad with an open mind and a good will that allows them to blunder into all kinds of unlikely friendships with locals. As to understanding the culture, well, that all starts with friendship, no matter how long you stay.


Posted by: the OTHER js at November 14, 2004 01:06 AM

I grew up on military bases in the U.S. and Germany, and others in my family were stationed in Britain, North Africa, Turkey, and Puerto Rico. My father and his brothers entered the military during the Depression and served in WWII. My brothers served in Vietnam, and abroad between Korea and Vietnam.

Oh, and most of us are college-educated, some of us (me included) are college faculty, and most of my family are liberal Democrats. Yep, we come from good, Southern military families, too. You'd call me an academic elite, but you'd be stereotyping me and people who teach in colleges around the country, based on silly, kneejerk myths no different from the ones you say liberals hold about red-staters.

Posted by: Beth at November 14, 2004 01:15 AM

Well, I would argue you have not seen a country or city if you just went there with the US millitary.

I have lived in a number of cities with large american millitary installations. The Americans there were always very eager to build their little America - and stay away from us "dirty natives". It alway surprised me how much effort was spent to keep separate. Own supermarkets, because we natives only eat "shit", own clubs, own churches, own tv and radio stations, own schools. And when traveling in the country, they just went to some Americans-only recreational facility.

I don't buy the line that one learns something about foreign contries when seeing the world with the US millitary. I have met more than one US soldier and family member you could hardly tell in which country he was, not talking about the slightest knowledge about the country's politics, current affairs, cultur or history. Oh yes, they all knew each and every cuss for us locales, gave a shit for local laws, customs and cultures. And they all could rant endlessly how great it is in America, and how bad it was in this country - the country they could hardly name.

You might physically be in other parts of the world with the US millitary, but not mentally. Mentally you stay in America. You see nothing, because you don't want to see.

Posted by: Frank at November 14, 2004 03:05 AM

This sounds all very generalised to me no offence is mean't just would like to see this more of a debate from both sides of politics and life.

Posted by: Sandra at November 14, 2004 04:09 AM

js (the original), Beth and Frank, thank you. I agree.

The idea that having been posted overseas for a tour of duty automatically increases international awareness is laughable.

I was born in a navy hospital. My brother is a navy lifer. An uncle is a 100% disabled vet from his service in Korea. My (Southern) husband is a 21 year combat arms vet (2 wars, thank you very much), and we spent our fair share of time on bases overseas. I know military life. I understand its sacrifices and its honor and its challenges.

Service does not, however, automatically convey political or international awareness. Nor does being posted overseas.

It is entirely possible to go into the military stupid as a wedge bolt and leave the service not having evolved at all, no matter where you're posted.

If you need verifiable examples, I give you

Ivan Frederick

Jeremy Sivits

Javal S. Davis

Charles Graner

Lynndie England

Sabrina Harman

Megan Ambuhl


Dissent is not traitorous. Patriotism doesn't appear only in those who wear a military uniform.
No party or group has the right to claim their values are the only truly American ones.

The oath was to the constitution, not the president.

Its rather embarrassing to see so many current and former military members forget that.

Posted by: kipper at November 14, 2004 04:38 AM

Eufaula, AL? Born there. Most of my family still goes to Barbour County for holiday dinner. Beautiful little town in the spring!

Posted by: Cathy at November 14, 2004 05:00 AM

Moore told Daily Variety that he and Harvey Weinstein, the Miramax boss who produced the film, hope to have "Fahrenheit 9/11 1/2" ready in two to three years

i.e., 2007 or therabouts.

Perfect. Looks like 2008 is in the bag, folks, who's up for 2012? ;-)

Re Kipper's comments-

You seem to have misunderstood the gist of the thread. The presumption of much of the Left seems to be that right-wingers are ignorant of, and uninterested in, what lies beyond the US's borders. The discussion of being posted overseas is in relation to that, and from there the discussion gravitated to the matter of "Who is going to have more exposure to things foreign, someone on a week-long vacation overseas, or someone posted overseas for years at a time"? The answer is fairly obvious, I won't belabor it.

With that out of the way, I haven't the slightest idea why you go on the "dissent is not treasonous" tangent- the only place in this thread where any variant of the word 'treason' appears is *your* post.

That you presume to remind the numerous people who have served tht have posted in this thread that the oath of enlistment refers to the Constitution and not the President makes me wonder exactly what is going through your mind, but I suspect it is called 'projection'.

Posted by: rosignol at November 14, 2004 05:03 AM

Former USAF. Lived in Germany for 4 years (out in a village not on base) and my kids were educated in the German schools. From that experience I did a lot of work in Africa (both Med and sub-Sahara) and the Middle East.

I was in Goma, Zaire providing humnatarian relief services to the fleeing Hutus of Rwanda.

I spent a good part of 1996 working with 7 African nations on improving their telecommunications infrastructure. I lived in Abijan in the Ivory Coast for nearly all of 1997.

I am Hispanic and an atehist.

I voted for Bush and live in a Red State. My wife's friend (a Kerry voter) is a Protestant, 35, still lives at home with her parents, hasn't worked in 3.5 years because she hasn't found a job with "the right karma and feun shui". She once travelled to Maryland and Australia (she was 4 at the time) but otherwise has never left home.

She attempted to lecture me on how my religious bigotry and ignorance of the world is why I voted for Bush.

Posted by: Faith+1 at November 14, 2004 05:30 AM

I am a military brat and was a military wife. I have lived in Europe, Asia, and have at least traveled every state of the union. Yes, some military live in the enclave but in my experience the vast majority were very active in the community of the country they lived in. On Okinawa, I was a Girl Scout and we met in tandem with an Okinawan GS troop. We developed a special badge that you earned by learning various things about the culture and history etc--my best freind was an Okinawan GS and we corresponded frequently into our adulthoods--she was a frequent visitor in our home and I in hers. My father was *in loco parentis* for our maid when she got married and we were a part of her wedding and then a part of the celebration when she had her first baby. Again, we corresponded after leaving--she was family in a special way.In Germany we spent time in the small farming town of my sister's accordian teacher's family. We visited and took part in family occasions. I rode the trains all over and could get around in the language. I also went to music school and was the only American in the school. I made friends and *chosen family* with whom I corresponded until their death.

I live in a *red* state and tend to be rather conservative. But I am not an ignorant red neck....I am a well traveled and well educated woman who has seriously educated herself about issues and such....Brought up in the military I learned early that the world is very small and that events that happen *far away* have a dramatic effect on my everyday life.

I am not going to argue who is better or who is best. But for this red stater, I know from personal knowledge and experience what makes this country the greatest on the face of the planet and why it is here I choose to live.

Posted by: Alix at November 14, 2004 05:52 AM

TmjUtah,

You are exactly right about the left-wing Americans in NGOs. The foreign nationals absolutely hated them because the ignorant bastards would try to condescend to the citizens of the nations they served. When the locals basically sneered at these idiots, the left-wingers would turn on those they ostensibly served. This usually was ugly and involved unvarnished racism.

The same type of left-wing lunatics drawn to social work domestically were found in the NGO's. The only time I was ashamed by fellow Americans (with the exception of one or two rednecks) was when this leftist trash decided that their "higher truth" entitled them to be callous and bigoted...and that was often.

Posted by: jay at November 14, 2004 06:17 AM

This Tennesseean loves Japan for the last 14 years. Working in vegetarian restaurants, doing missionary work, helping the homeless, and of course teaching English (got to make a few yen). Every time i go back to the States it seems weirder and weirder - how can the people be so upset at life when they have the best in the world (except for the bathrooms)?????

I still say to anyone who cares to listen that every 18 year old in every country should have to spend at least one month abroad, and not as just a tourist - but have to get something accomplished, like getting a tire fixed in Madras, or help a shop-owner get his books on a computer in Vietnam, or build a church in Cambodia, or buy some land in Ginza (might need a few billion yen for that one - ha!).

There would be a lot less moaning and complaining over things taken for granted in every-day life after they got back.

Posted by: daniel at November 14, 2004 06:23 AM

The libs don't understand the majority of this country's culture. Small wonder that they doubt anyone else's claim to understand, even in part, another country's culture.

Posted by: Jim at November 14, 2004 06:29 AM

I was born in Louisiana of a Louisiana mother. I was raised in the army, and spent four years in a military boarding school in Virginia. I lived two years in Japan and visited Hong Kong for two weeks. I spent a total of 27 years in the army, active, reserve, National Guard, with a normal tour in Korea. I have memories of living in Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Massachusettes, Virginia, and California. With all this, I am a liberal. Seems to me there is a lot of projection going on in this thread. If nothing else, right now the per centage of military in respect to the rest of the population is quite small and the blue states have their share of military members, too.
You get what you look for.If you want to remember all the liberals you met in Budapest and forget the conservatives there, you will do that. The opposite is, of course, true. If you want to remember the New Hampshire guys in your platoon and forget those from Alabama, that too will happen.
One thing a lot of my fellow brats remember, and I remember this vividly when I returned from Japan and went to a civilian school for the 7th grade, is the total disbelief the locals had for our foreign experience. Teachers would ignore first hand experience and contradict a person who had lived in the country.
This means that I'm not sure that foreign travel rubs off on any of those who stayed behind. I know the consensus of people I talked to after returning back to the States was "Aren't you glad you are back in America?"
In general, there is a lot of stereotyping in this thread.

Posted by: Gene at November 14, 2004 06:30 AM

Interesting comments. Just a couple of observations:

Having lived in Eastern Canada as a Mormon missionary, I can say that Canadians are nice people who generally treated us politely (when they did come to the door).

Of course, there were those few who didn't hide when we knocked, like the old Catholic lady who screamed at us in French (I was a greenie at the time, so I didn't know the language well enough to get what she was talking about).

And then there was the old guy who was about ready to get his shotgun because he thought we had been sent by his daughter and he had TOLD HER ALREADY THAT HE WASN'T INTERESTED, DAMNIT!! (He calmed down, thankfully, when we truthfully told him we didn't know his daughter).

And then there is the hot, worldly young lady who wants to see two young Mormon men blush and squirm and thus shows up at the door wearing a string bikini or towel or (in some cases) even less and invites them in for a drink. Unfortunately, I mean uh, fortunately, I never had this experience (which is why there is a rule stating that single women are always taught by the lady missionaries).

But one thing I did learn was that Canadians, despite all their virtues and good intentions, are far, far more provincial and prejudiced in their thinking than the average American.

Just ask a Canadian what he thinks of South Asians (they called them "Pakies") or American Indians.

Or, just ask them about the United States. Be prepared to listen for about an hour.

Posted by: Captain Holly at November 14, 2004 07:10 AM

Half of my roots are planted in Brooklyn. I remember my astonishment growing up in the 50's that many of our neighbors had never even crossed the East River into Manhattan much less traveled anywhere beyond (and had no desire to do so). I'm long gone from Brooklyn and while I imagine that only small vestige of such provinciality remains, I still can be astonished by some of the parochial attitudes coming out of this blue bastion.

My family, BTW, crossed the East River daily and ventured beyond on many occasions. My aunt was a world traveler who instilled in me a love of adventure and travel (and left me some cash with which to do it).

The rest of my roots were planted in North Carolina before the Revolution. It is that branch which boasts a military tradition and whose members have had life experiences much as those described above.

And, while traveling abroad is great, I would urge everyone to become intimately acquainted with our own county. It truly is a wonderous place, diverse beyond imagination.

Posted by: Kyda Sylvester at November 14, 2004 08:29 AM

The thing is this:

I can honestly say that those of us who live in terrorist-targeted big cities on the coasts, who have Ivy league educations, and who have a condescending attitude to "red staters" do not spend much time thinking about the red stater. This is why it's such a HUGE SHOCK that Bush won reelection.

Clearly, the right wing invests a lot of energy attacking "academic and media elitists" -- I mean, come on, you protest a bit much...

So, anyway, I decided to try to see what a "reasonable" rightwing blog consists of...

I'd say this: on Leftwing blogs the main thrust of discussion is to disagree with each other...whereas...it seems that the main goal here is to agree with each other about how bad tha absent "academic and media elitists" are...which seems like a kinda vapid, self-congratulatory undertaking...but..hey...its a free country..more or less...so far...

Posted by: I really am a Leftist at November 14, 2004 08:37 AM

"I can honestly say that those of us who live in terrorist-targeted big cities on the coasts, who have Ivy league educations, and who have a condescending attitude to "red staters" do not spend much time thinking about the red stater."

That's funny, I thought the terrorists were targeting AMERICA? I don't recall them asking for zip codes before they blow people up. And is Oklahoma City on the coast? Is Nashville, where they just arrested an Iraqi terrorist buying guns and grenades so he can "go Jihad" on a local school? I don't think the big city coasties have a monopoly on being threatened (Although I am not at all surprised that they are trying to claim one . . . it is typical of their egos to think that they are the only ones worth killing.)

And Ivy League educations? A lot of middle class guys from the Bronx attending Harvard and Yale are they? East LA sending a lot of homies to Princeton?

"I'd say this: on Leftwing blogs the main thrust of discussion is to disagree with each other...whereas...it seems that the main goal here is to agree with each other about how bad tha absent "academic and media elitists" are...which seems like a kinda vapid, self-congratulatory undertaking...but..hey...its a free country..more or less...so far..."

Visited the Democratic Underground lately? Yeah, those enlightened folks love having their ideas challenged . . . no "yes" men there for sure. In fact, they love intellectual debate so much that they auto-ban ANY conservative who registers to post. But at least they warn you in their Terms of Service, so I guess they are honest in their closemindedness.

"This is why it's such a HUGE SHOCK that Bush won reelection."

It was a shock to the Blue staters that Bush won because you simply cannot fathom how anyone can disagree with you. You are so sure of your own elightened superiority that the real world cannot even been seen, much less accepted as truth.

Unless you change your ways, you better get used to losing . . .


Posted by: David at November 14, 2004 08:58 AM

TO: Frank
RE: Those "Dirty Natives"

"The Americans there were always very eager to build their little America - and stay away from us "dirty natives"." -- Frank

How very odd. I never saw that. Indeed, the only "dirty natives" I ever saw in my 27 years in the infantry were some children living in a village in a Panamanian jungle. But children usually do get dirty, even in America.

As for living in my 'little America' that was hardly the case as my 'little America' was not much larger than three football fields. And most of it was taken up by a motor park. Had to and wanted to get out into the country-side.

I remember one evening when we weathered a storm and had dinner with the family of a German butcher. Times drinking fine German beer and exchanging views with them in their taverns. Swapping stories of jumps with old falschirmjagers from WWII. Quaffing banana daquaries in some tavern in Panama City. Eating mystery meat on a stick in Colon. Swapping C-rats for fresh fruit with villagers in the jungle of Panama.

Lots of 'little America', eh?

RE: What You Buy

"I don't buy the line that one learns something about foreign contries when seeing the world with the US millitary." -- Frank

Nobody expects someone like you to buy anything regarding our honest reports. It's pretty obvious you're one of the so-called 'educated' liberals we're talking about. So, do go back and play in your echo chamber.

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[You haven't lived until you've almost died.]

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 14, 2004 09:14 AM

TO: kipper
RE:

"Dissent is not traitorous. Patriotism doesn't appear only in those who wear a military uniform." -- kipper

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So what have you done for me lately?

"No party or group has the right to claim their values are the only truly American ones." -- kipper

Patently wrong, here, kip.

Go ask the National Socialist Party of America. Then compare and contrast with the so-called "Liberals" and the "Conservatives".

See which one of the two latter comes out being more like the NSP. Then come back and talk to me about true Americans.

"The oath was to the constitution, not the president." -- kipper

Partially right. Mostly wrong when you look at the numbers.

Officers swear to the Constitution.

Enlisted swear to the Constiution AND the president and officers appointed over them.

Considering there are more enlisted personnel than commissioned officers, you're pretty much more wrong than right.

"Its rather embarrassing to see so many current and former military members forget that." -- kipper

Forget what? Something we do all the time? Hardly. What's really embarrassing is your post.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 14, 2004 09:23 AM

TO: rosignol
RE: kipper

"... I haven't the slightest idea why you go on the "dissent is not treasonous" tangent- the only place in this thread where any variant of the word 'treason' appears is *your* post." -- rosignol

Maybe kipper has a guilty conscience? Or it might have to do with ignorance. You know...what this thread is talking about?

Kip is certainly ignorant of what the oath of enlistment says.

Regards,

Chuck(le)

Posted by: Chuck Pelto at November 14, 2004 09:35 AM

There's a lot of opinion floating around but not too much citation of facts. I wouldn't be surprised if passport issuance figures would be available by state and maybe even town. Exit and entry records should also be available so you could figure out who went where (no doubt with personal information stripped off). This isn't rocket science, folks but a little bit of data massage to figure out which states are least and most traveled.

Why, on left or on right, has nobody suggested actually finding out the objective facts of the matter? It's just a few database searches.

Posted by: TM Lutas at November 14, 2004 09:53 AM

Great thread, but are you still alive Steven? You usually give us a "notice" when blogging will be light. 2 posts in 10 days? What gives?

Posted by: TheKid at November 14, 2004 10:02 AM

"Why, on left or on right, has nobody suggested actually finding out the objective facts of the matter? It's just a few database searches."

What exactly are you searching for? All this is opinion, but it is based on a hell of a lot of personal experience.

I maintain, once again, that the military is the easiest way to see the world (they pay for it and have no problem with sending you there). I also state that military members, because they are sent overseas to live for LONG periods of time (months to years) naturally interact with the people of the world on a more frequent and constant basis than the vast majorit