![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Cats Are For Sissies
Posted by Will Collier · 29 October 2004
For all of us who were repulsed by yesterday's insufferably-cutesy NY Times bit on catblogging, here's the indispensible Lileks to remind us that real Americans have dogs. Comments
Stephen I'm surprised you believe anything you read in the NYT, in fact I'm surprised you read it at all. Cats are wonderful as are dogs. We've had four feline members of our family and one wonderful half German shepherd half husky dog. They are all in heaven now and we miss them all every single day. Posted by: erp at October 29, 2004 07:00 AMYeah, gotta agree with you, erp, nothing wrong with cats. With 2 sons (12and 2 yrs old), a cat is much easier as a pet. We have had a dog, but it was more trouble and less love than the boys, and our cat is as close to a dog as you can get. She answers when called, and doesn't bark at anything. Dogs are so much better than cats. Cats just seem so European. Yes, dogs are loud and can destroy things, but they are also loyal companions and guard my wife and son and I against any intruders. Or squirrels. Posted by: Duane at October 29, 2004 07:27 AMThere's a First Cat in the White House as well as a First Dog. Does that make W a girlie man (or less than a real American)? Posted by: Connecticut Yankee at October 29, 2004 07:38 AMEnough of this caterwauling! You're all getting too catty with these catfights, and if you don't shape up, I'm gonna dog the whole kitten caboodle of ya. Posted by: Mike at October 29, 2004 07:50 AMCats make excellent pets. For dogs. Posted by: David [.net] at October 29, 2004 07:56 AMActually you need a cat to keep the dog(s) in line Posted by: dorf at October 29, 2004 08:01 AMWe are a country at war. We are divided by a bitter political campaign. Martha Stewart is in prison, and Ashley Simpson is suffering from acid reflux disease. At a time like this, can't pets and their people all come together in mutual respect and understanding, regardless of species? Posted by: denise at October 29, 2004 08:19 AMI have two and trust me, cats have as much personality as any dog. Unfortunately they have shitty personalities sometimes. :) One spent the entire night laying on my head and purring at me and the other could care less that I exist. They crap in a box and I don't have to walk them in the rain/snow so they are certainly more self sufficient than a dog. Posted by: Britton at October 29, 2004 08:20 AMBoth dogs and cats are perfect companions to such a nuanced species as man. Posted by: Brett at October 29, 2004 08:24 AMI find comfort in the fact that were I to die unnoticed, my cat would have no reservations devouring my corpse if there were no other food available. Of course, the bargain goes both ways. Posted by: Tom at October 29, 2004 08:51 AMCatblogging is for wimps - Olive Tree blogging is the real thing :) http://www.di2.nu/blog.htm?20041029 Posted by: Francis Turner at October 29, 2004 08:55 AMReal men have dogs. They also vote for Bush. And they don't marry for money. Rant? Perhaps. Posted by: jay at October 29, 2004 08:56 AMMy cats come when I call (even to the window) are great companions, are born potty trained and very affectionate. I would love to have dogs too, but I think it is mean to leave a dog inside all day and I don't like wee wee pads (not the same as using a litter box). Some Cats and dogs can have difficult personalities, just like people. The only issue I have right now is my new kitten brings toys into the bed to play with her sisters at 6am every morning before I am to get up! But it is also adorable. Posted by: Catherine at October 29, 2004 09:04 AMDon't like cats, eh? Well, Steve, how would you like some of this delicious and tasty Kool-Aid? ;) Posted by: Laurence Simon at October 29, 2004 09:12 AMWill. So sorry. I just noticed that it wasn't Stephen who blogged this article. I'm still not used to guest bloggers on this site. Posted by: erp at October 29, 2004 10:16 AMLileks shows a cute picture of a dog and you work it up to a full-blown failure on the part of your cat-owning fellow Americans. One might almost think you were John Kerry ... Posted by: MartiniPundit at October 29, 2004 10:23 AMI forget who said it but: Robert - that is particularly true of male dog owners who hate cats. It bothers them that cats expect to have their devotion earned and their egos can't take it. The need constant ego boosting by their dogs. Posted by: Catherine at October 29, 2004 11:15 AM"real Americans have dogs" Tell that to Heinlein, bub. :) Posted by: Garrett at October 29, 2004 12:17 PMMy two cats (custody from a soured relationship) flip-flop a John Kerry catnip toy all over the apartment. So there! Posted by: Brad at October 29, 2004 02:26 PMI do not have a dog and will probably never have a dog. This does not have anything to do with my like or dislike of dogs (although I do prefer cats), it has to do with only one thing: I refuse to follow behind a dog and pick up after it. No way, Jose. I would be a totally irresponsible dog owner and my dog's doo would be left where he dropped it, I guarantee. My cat uses the garden and that's just swell by me, as Mother Nature takes care of it all by herself with no help from me whatsoever. Posted by: Science Teacher at October 29, 2004 04:00 PMI like cats, but there's something about cat people... the ones to whom cat ownership is something nearing religion. Posted by: Sarah Brabazon-Biggar at October 29, 2004 10:29 PMI like cats, but there's something about cat people... the ones to whom cat ownership is something nearing religion. That nails it. I've got a cat, and I've even come to not mind it and sometimes even enjoy its company (it was either a cat or a jamboree of mice....or is that a 'murder of mice'?). There is something slightly disturbing about cat people. Of course, there's something disturbing about dog people, but I digress..... Posted by: jpe at October 30, 2004 12:48 PMJpe wrote: I've met some fairly weird dog people (in fact, Christopher Guest made a movie about them), but they're not as common as the cat people. Cat people remind me of those people who are a little too enthusiastic about their iPod or iMac or their Mini Cooper. Come to think of it, I bet all of the above groups are much more likely to be cat owners. And the men to have goatees and thick-rim glasses. It's an odd little subculture. Posted by: Sarah Brabazon-Biggar at October 30, 2004 08:17 PMNo one will see this, but I still have to write it: I've met some fairly weird dog people (in fact, Christopher Guest made a movie about them), but they're not as common as the cat people. Bullshit. Dog people are freaky when they attribute some odd masculinity to their dogs. Take a frat guy: he's likely to think his dog is 'rugged' and 'independent'. This is just as much an anthroporphization as any weird-o cat fan. They're both weird. You're just characterizing cat owners as feminined, when the masculinization of dog owners is just as bizarre. Well, maybe I just travel in the wrong circles, but I haven't met any of the weird frat-boy dog people. I have met drug-dealer types with their pitbulls, which is skeevy but not really weird. I don't get the impression that they view their pet as an almost higher form of life than themselves, which is the definite vibe I get from the cat people. And I wouldn't call it feminized. More like Greenwich-ized, I guess. Posted by: Sarah Brabazon-Biggar at November 1, 2004 12:45 PM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"VodkaPundit is like Goldstein except too serious and not nearly as funny."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |