VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Open Comments Thread
Posted by Stephen Green  ·   5 October 2004

Have at it - I'm closing the main drunkblog post to reduce server strain.

Comments

Nice first question. Sheesh.

Posted by: James at October 5, 2004 07:04 PM

Shiner Bock and a debate.

Meant to go together.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 07:04 PM

I see Edwards is already lying re: the 9/11-Saddam connection.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:08 PM

Weird as it is, this is the first time I have seen Edwards speak live. He reminds me of a cute kid that is trying to lecture his teacher.

Already.

I'm not impressed. Edwards is out of his league.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 07:08 PM

Denigrating the Special Forces in Tora Bora too, I see.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:09 PM

Trying to trackback but it's not working. Oh, well. I guess I'll go to bed...

Posted by: La Shawn at October 5, 2004 07:11 PM

I'm so glad this man won't be the Senator from my state anymore.

I just hope he's not promoted to VP.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:14 PM

Pattern: Bush (poorly) and Cheney (decently) try to answer the question asked... Kerry & Edwards spend at most one sentence on the question, then turn to attacking their opposite number on whatever convenient fact or fiction they can think of. Anything they say about their plans is vague, if it gets said at all.

Posted by: Dave at October 5, 2004 07:14 PM

"I'm sorry, but what attention was diverted from Afghanistan. Those who think so, need to study logistics, and why it's almost impossible to increase our presence in Afghanistan."


Most people don't know about how these things work and the Bush administration hasn't explained it well enough. It does leave them open for the Kerry camp to attack on that point.

Posted by: Trogdor at October 5, 2004 07:15 PM

wtf is with cheney's blinking?

Posted by: nt moore at October 5, 2004 07:15 PM

I keep expecting Cheney to slam Edwards for saying we shouldn't have let the Afgans fight at Tora Bora. Maybe he's waiting for Edwards to mention alliances... but, man, I'd like to see a body slam here.

Posted by: Nate at October 5, 2004 07:15 PM

Me too, Nate.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:17 PM

Where the hell did Edwards drag in a Iraq-9/11 connection from? If you're going to lie, at least make up a lie that fits the question at hand.

So far it looks like Edwards is following Kerry's strategy of packing so many falsehoods into a single response that it's impossible to offer an effective rebuttal in the limited time given: The sky is purple and the moon is made of green cheese because Bush is still lying about beating his wife.

Ah, and now he's "clarifying" what Kerry said in the first debate by making stuff up and stating the exact opposite of what Kerry actually said. Which again had nothing to do with the question.

What's the moderator for, exactly?

Posted by: Bryan C at October 5, 2004 07:17 PM

Edwards is losing the battle of defending Kerry. He is on his heals so far.

Edwards is plain ignoring facts and working on spin alone.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 07:19 PM

I'm liking it - Cheney is unruffled by the smooth operator from NC.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:20 PM

Nice comeback on that question by Cheney. Edwards is definately on his heels.

Posted by: Jim H. at October 5, 2004 07:21 PM

"You probably weren't there to vote for that..."

I am sooo glad I had already swallowed my beer when he said that.

Posted by: Nick Bourbaki at October 5, 2004 07:22 PM

Agreed, Nick :)

BTW, I don't like this moderator. She,like Edwards, doesn't have her facts straight regarding certain quotes.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:23 PM

"You probably weren't there to vote for that..." and on that note, MSNBC opens the split screeen.

Posted by: Paddy at October 5, 2004 07:23 PM

I don't know what debate John Edwards watched last thursday, but I saw a totally different one.

Posted by: RJ Bruce at October 5, 2004 07:23 PM

DAMN! I love Dick Cheney. Love that he brought up Dean.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:24 PM

Na na na na, hey hey hye, goodbye. Bunnies. (ht JG).

Posted by: Howard at October 5, 2004 07:24 PM

Cheney: "If they can't stand up to Howard Dean, how can we expect them to stand up to Al Qaeda?"

Posted by: Nate at October 5, 2004 07:25 PM

Hard to slam Bremer when you picked the man!

Posted by: Nick at October 5, 2004 07:25 PM

Wow. Cheney is pounding away. Meat vs. Parsley.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 07:26 PM

I agree Sister. She must not read blogs.

Posted by: Hollywood_Freaks at October 5, 2004 07:37 PM

I'm not watching the debate, reading the posts is so much more fun. Sounds like Cheney is doing very well.

Posted by: Carl at October 5, 2004 07:37 PM

Edwards is off his game ... being from NC, we recognize when he's on and off :)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:37 PM

Cheney still hasn't addressed Bremer's comment.

Posted by: Nick at October 5, 2004 07:38 PM

60 countries with Al Qaeda...how many are we going to invade? I'd like to know that.

Posted by: Nick at October 5, 2004 07:39 PM

Edwards is looking pretty weak. He's stuck on his talking points while Cheney beats him over the head with them.

Edwards made a big mistake going on the offensive against Cheney, he's not even in the same league.

Oh dear lord, now he's going after Halliburton...this is getting sad.

Posted by: Mike M at October 5, 2004 07:40 PM

Nick: "Cheney still hasn't addressed Bremer's comment."

He's too busy correcting the Senator's obvious misrepesentations about the Bush admins record.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:40 PM

Cheney just got his heeledlocked by Edwards.

Posted by: Henry Schlatman at October 5, 2004 07:41 PM

Ah yes ... the old Halliburton card ... (stretch - yawn)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:42 PM

Well, so far it looks like Cheney is beating Edwards like a drum. Time for another delicious martini in honour of our host.

How many countries are we going to invade? Dunno. Smash half a dozen flat and the other 54 will fall into line.

Posted by: David Gillies at October 5, 2004 07:43 PM

French and Germans say no change in policy ...

Good on you, Gwen! I bet that's the first time millions of people have heard that news.

Where's your policy now, Kerry?

Posted by: DrSteve at October 5, 2004 07:44 PM

Yea, the Bremer comment could have been deadly, if it hadn't been mis-stated. Bremer was talking about Turkey failing to allow 4ID to invade Iraq from the north. Not the current situation.

Mike

Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2004 07:44 PM

LOL! "Senator Gone" - I love it.

I could kiss Cheney right now. Right on the mouth!

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:44 PM

Republicans hate school kids, MLK! Etc!

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:46 PM

Here comes the mud slinging!!

Posted by: Jim H. at October 5, 2004 07:46 PM

Damn!
"The first time Senator, I've ever met you was when you stepped on stage tonight."
Just Damn!

Posted by: Glendon at October 5, 2004 07:46 PM

Jesus - did anyone just see that 'aw shucks, the big bad man didn't talk about Israel but ah sure did.' Edwards looked like a twelve year old.

Posted by: David Gillies at October 5, 2004 07:47 PM

Is Cheney trying to pass the buck on his turn?

Posted by: Henry Schlatman at October 5, 2004 07:48 PM

Still seema like the prof in a discussion with someone who crammed for an hour before class.

Cheney has been powerful.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 07:48 PM

Best. Line. Since. Lloyd.

Posted by: Howard at October 5, 2004 07:48 PM

What do the teachers out there think of "No Child Left Behind"?

Posted by: Nick at October 5, 2004 07:49 PM

Sheesh. There's my alma mater, looking all good on TV, and Ifill manages to work in that Cleveland is the "biggest, poorest city" in the U.S. Can't the city ever catch a break?

Posted by: Dave C at October 5, 2004 07:50 PM

Of course, Nick, the moderator misstated Bremer's position... he clarified it in an email to the WaPo that he was talking about when we first started, and that he thought we currently did have enough troops.

The Bush Admin is listening to the trooop commanders on troop numbers, not the civil servants. So...

Also, I found an old story from July that says Bremer thought we should have had more MPs at the start. Understandable, but no longer the issue it was now that the Iraqi police are getting training going.

Posted by: Dave at October 5, 2004 07:50 PM

This is turning into Professor Cheney
vs. Used Car Salesman Edwards.

Posted by: hagan at October 5, 2004 07:50 PM

Say it with me:

CHENEY . . . IS . . . KICKING . . . ASS!!

I hope he runs for President in 2008. That'll be the first election I'd be eligible to vote in, and I'd want my vote to be for someone with his integrity. I've got to go in about ten minutes, but Edwards isn't looking so good. :P

Posted by: Chris S. at October 5, 2004 07:50 PM

Damn indeed!

When Edwards went over Cheney's record, voting against meals on wheels, and "plastic guns that can pass through metal detectors" etc, I'm like, is this the worst thing you can say about his record- he must be great, those three or four programs were pretty stupid.

Posted by: Rex Stetson at October 5, 2004 07:51 PM

Stephen, you're on a roll till 8:50. I thought the same thing, "2 down, many to go".

Posted by: Howard at October 5, 2004 07:51 PM

31% unemployment in Cleveland? Where the hell did she pull that out of? Try about 6.3%

Posted by: Mike M at October 5, 2004 07:52 PM

Plop a cold, steel, robotic heart in that guy and I think he may already have my vote in '08.

Posted by: Captain Mojo at October 5, 2004 07:53 PM

The class warfare card ... (stretch yawn, part two)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:53 PM

If I hear Edwards say "he's distorting again" one more time I'm going to throw something through the tv.

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 07:54 PM

Does Edwards have any clue what he is talking about?

OK, I agree with cutting spending, but what is going to be cut while Kerry is cutting taxes?

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 07:54 PM

Did Edwards get deficit v. debt wrong? I was stirring sauce.

Posted by: DrSteve at October 5, 2004 07:54 PM

my wife is a teacher - she hates NCLB - in her view it is an unfunded mandate. Apparently the best thing for kids is low class sizes. Teaching isn't like selling faucets. The cheapest education isn't the best. Market forces shouldn't direct education.

Posted by: nt moore at October 5, 2004 07:54 PM

Edwards: "Let me be honest with you...." When someone (pol or not) says that, they are invariably lying.

Posted by: DesiJacknut at October 5, 2004 07:55 PM

Dick Cheney whipped Edwards' arse so hard during the foreign policy/security policy segment that "Senator Gone" will need a very soft pillow when he sits down for the rest of the week. It was getting pitiful, all Edwards could do was bleat about Halliburton while Cheney ripped the Kerry/Edwards record - or, in Edwards' case, the lack of one - to bits and pieces. Cheney is a mean old junkyard dog, and I mean that as a compliment.

Posted by: Joe at October 5, 2004 07:56 PM

Man, I wish Cheney was debating Kerry, him against Edwards is like James Carville vs. a Grapefruit.

Posted by: Dan at October 5, 2004 07:56 PM

Lots of talk about tax cuts and just a few minutes before talk of the $200 billion tab in Iraq. What am I missing?

Posted by: Nick at October 5, 2004 07:57 PM

Edwards is moving his hands around way too much. He can't be a trial lawyer while he's sitting at a table. Did you also notice when he pounded his finger on the table? That's not going to make him look any less like a little kid...

Posted by: Dave C at October 5, 2004 07:57 PM

Desi: especially when it comes from the mouth of Sen. Edwards.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:57 PM

Dan, I wish Zell Miller would have debated Kerry Thursday night.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 07:58 PM

Is it just me or these questions are incredibly better than the ones on the presidential debate?

Posted by: Henrique at October 5, 2004 08:00 PM

Man, Edwards is one condescending little prick. I thought he was going to pat Cheney on the head re: embracing his daughter. Edwards doesn't sound comfortable discussing gays & lesbians, does he? Sounds forced.

Posted by: DrSteve at October 5, 2004 08:01 PM

"Let me go back and answer the other question first then I'll leave a couple seconds for this one" There should be a rule against that.

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 08:01 PM

"Okay, I want people to understand that I'm totally freaking condescending."

And Edwards just utterly handcuffed himself by putting the democrats on the same side of the same sex marriage debate.

Posted by: Dan at October 5, 2004 08:01 PM

What is that on Edwards' lapel? Cheney has a flag on his lapel but Edwards has somthing round. Is it a no nukes (peace) sign?

Posted by: Tom Gallagher at October 5, 2004 08:01 PM

Not just you Henrique. Much better questions in general.

Posted by: DesiJacknut at October 5, 2004 08:02 PM

Better questions, but the moderator is not a good one.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:02 PM

NCLB is not a mandate. Schools can opt out and not get the money. It is not really unfunded.

Your wife might be misinformed. All the NCLB does is say by 2014 all children must be learning at grade level. Each state has different standards, all they have to do is prove that their schools are meeting the standards they set. If they want help, they can use NCLB money to meet the goals, but must meet federal standards, IIRC.

Your wife should also poke around the Brookings Institute and its' review of NCLB. Brookings leans left.

I love it. It's about time. You can tell your wife from me that we have 1/3 of the world, 2 billion people nipping at our economic heels. They are studying math and science, we study diversity in college sports.

Posted by: Sandy P at October 5, 2004 08:02 PM

Cheney's thank to the kind words of Edwards....Cheney even wins that.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 08:02 PM

Edwardian spaghetti rhetoric

Posted by: rsl at October 5, 2004 08:03 PM

Also, isn't the whole "states' laws are binding in other states" thing in the constitution?

Posted by: Dan at October 5, 2004 08:03 PM

Cheney's kicking Edward's ass. God I wish Bush could speak like this....

Posted by: matt at October 5, 2004 08:03 PM

OOH! OOH!! Maybe he's going to channel the little girl again!

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 08:04 PM

Cheney clearly didn't want to get too far into the gay marriage debate. He obviously disagrees with the pres. No bigs - they can't agree on everything.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:04 PM

Before all of this, I thought edwards was a player. Now I think he's a schmuck.

Posted by: Matt at October 5, 2004 08:05 PM

Cheney is doing superbly better than Edward. I love his jabs on Edward's record. He put Edward on the defensive -a good strategy

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:05 PM

Nice Med Mal plan, Sen. Edwards. You're how many years into your Senate term? Did you think it up in the shower just this morning?

Posted by: DrSteve at October 5, 2004 08:06 PM

Frivolous law suits....nice. Tort reform is the #1 domestic concern of mine. Lawyers are ripping apart the community: how can you reach out when you're afraid that reach might trigger the other person to sue?

Posted by: matt at October 5, 2004 08:06 PM

Trial lawyers and lawsuits have little to do with health care costs?

But then the costs are related?

Is he channeling Kerry again?

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 08:06 PM

ohhh a "feelings" question.... I spoke too soon.

"how do you feel" pifff how can you answer that without a platitude?.... well the foreign policy questions were great.

Posted by: Henrique at October 5, 2004 08:07 PM

WTF? How can he say that medical costs aren't related to malpractice suits????

Posted by: kelly at October 5, 2004 08:07 PM

Matt, just thank God he's not your Senator.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:07 PM

Cheney is showing his experience which makes Edward look like a toddler

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:07 PM

Lurch and the Lightweight will be licking their wounds tonight.

Posted by: seismic at October 5, 2004 08:08 PM

I'd love to see Cheney debate Kerry...or even Hillary...man, would this guy actually run?? I really thought he was going to step down to make way for McCain (aka: Hillary-beater)...mebbe not...

Posted by: matt at October 5, 2004 08:08 PM

I really love Dick Cheney, he's such a classy guy. He's like a conventional politician, but with a very ready wit that he has used to great advantage tonight. Senator Edwards comes across sometimes as likeable, other times as an arrogant, self-promoting JFK wannabe. Cheney seems to me consistantly likeable. So, IMO, the choice is clear.

Posted by: Chris S. at October 5, 2004 08:09 PM

Cheney just whipped up again. Oops-there's Halliburton again!

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 08:09 PM

haha..siesmec...

Posted by: matt at October 5, 2004 08:09 PM

is anyone keeping tabs on how many times Halliburton is mentioned by Edwards?

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:09 PM

Wait a minute . . . HALLIBURTON AGAIN!?!?!?! WTF kinda shit is that?

Can we PLEASE go five minutes without Senator Edwards bringing up HALLIBURTON!?!?!?!?

Posted by: Chris S. at October 5, 2004 08:09 PM

NCLB is great...in ten years, once all the lefty whining has died down, we won't even remember what the fuss was all about.

Posted by: ScienceTeacher at October 5, 2004 08:10 PM

Don't they realize how inside the beltway Haliburton is?

Posted by: seismic at October 5, 2004 08:10 PM

Anyone have a link for that statement about Edwards' setting up an S corp to avoid paying taxes? That's awesome if true - and Edwards had nothing to say, instead going back to "Halliburton is evil, and you were there, so you're evil too!"

Posted by: Dave C at October 5, 2004 08:11 PM

Teresa Heinz Kerry is the country's biigest tax dodger.

Posted by: Doug at October 5, 2004 08:11 PM

hey Toldjah - Edwards is bad but I've got....HIllary.....and Bill Clinton lives in the town in which I grew up...you think you got problems??

Posted by: matt at October 5, 2004 08:11 PM

Am I the only one hoping that Cheney coaches Bush before Friday's debate? That is one smart and terrific communicator. One can hope Bush is taking notes.

Posted by: Carla at October 5, 2004 08:11 PM

This debate is really heavy on data (numbers, ratios, laws, votes, etc) I wonder how the fact-checking on that is going, and how much attention it will get.

Posted by: Henrique at October 5, 2004 08:11 PM

I'm thinking that Edwards answer to the AIDS question (didn't see that one coming btw) is going to be Halliburton is evil and Cheney is distorting the truth

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 08:12 PM

Touche Matt! :)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:13 PM

hallburton questions? FactCheck.com

Posted by: matt at October 5, 2004 08:13 PM

It looks like Cheney's winning - but does that matter? Kerry clearly won the first one but the bounce he got from it is negligible. We'll see...

Posted by: David Gillies at October 5, 2004 08:13 PM

Good Point Henrique

no answer here.

Posted by: Hollywood_Freaks at October 5, 2004 08:13 PM

I'm with you, Carla

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:14 PM

Chaeney seems to honestly answer the AIDS question presented, but Edwards goes off on talking points. That was weak for Edwards. Big time.

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 08:14 PM

What time served on the Senate Intelligence Committee? He's never there!

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:14 PM

Greetings,

Cheney (sp), is doing a great job of articulating the current position. You know he is an adult as he speak.

How many times is he going to call Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney a liar tonight? If he hits 143 I win a 'brand new car!!!'

Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2004 08:15 PM

Gwen's soooooo much better than Jim Lehrer was last week.

Posted by: kelly at October 5, 2004 08:15 PM

You gotta wonder . . . did Terry McAulfie (sic) tell Senator Edwards to just go out and say "Halliburton" every thirty seconds?

If Kerry is elected and he gets killed (God forbid), do we REALLY want this guy Edwards as President? You gotta ask yourself . . .

Posted by: Chris S. at October 5, 2004 08:15 PM

"During the time I've served" WHAT! Yeah that's a good idea-put your time served up against Cheney's.

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 08:15 PM

PS: To add to my last post, he's never here in this state either! (Unless he's campaigning of course)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:15 PM

i am afraid edwards is wrong, you don't get AIDS from not seeing a doctor.

Posted by: evan gregorian at October 5, 2004 08:15 PM

Edwards = Quayle!

Posted by: scott at October 5, 2004 08:16 PM

"You want me to answer a question about _his_ qualifications?" Fantastic! And he gets in a deadpan about delivering Wyoming's three electoral votes! Fabulous...

Posted by: Dave C at October 5, 2004 08:17 PM

"You want me to talk about Edwards' qualifications?" Have at, Dick!

WTF is with that damn COFFEE MUG!?!?!?!

Posted by: Chris S. at October 5, 2004 08:17 PM

Thank you John for honoring Cheney's exemplary service to the nation.

Posted by: Doug at October 5, 2004 08:17 PM

matt... factcheck.com ain't workin

nor is my use of the english language.

Posted by: Hollywood_Freaks at October 5, 2004 08:17 PM

I have concluded based on what i see tonight in this debate, Edward isnt politically experienced to take up the role as the Vice president of America.

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:18 PM

Edwards wrap up - naptime.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:18 PM

I guess that answers some folks' question about Cheney for 2008..."I have no further political aspirations myself."

Posted by: Nick at October 5, 2004 08:18 PM

This has been riveting. At this point, Edwards has been asked why he, having the least experience ever of any VP candidate should be one heartbeat away (not commenting on that, but just to indicate when I'm typing this). The man looks (on my crappy old B&W teevee) like he's sweating buckets. Edwards has clearly been more flustered by this, and there was one point, earlier, when Edwards thought he got in a good dig, that Cheney simply smirked at the idiocy of what Edwards had tried. Cheney has been a Gibralter through this.

IMHO, Cheney is wiping the floor with Edwards. With extreme prejudice.

Posted by: Matteo at October 5, 2004 08:18 PM

I think Cheney won this and won it going away.

Edwards has some style, but there is so little of substance in what he says that it makes it painful to listen to him when it comes to foreign policy its hard to watch.

Clear win for Cheney. Edwards did somewhat better than expected. Its too bad he is out of the Senate. If he was still in and they lose this election, he could spend four more years working on his fp credentials.

Posted by: P & G Archivist at October 5, 2004 08:18 PM

but he's still got great hair, bystander ...

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:19 PM

Kerry went with McCain to Vietnam to find out about our MIAs, huh?

Paging Mr. Schanberg!

Posted by: DrSteve at October 5, 2004 08:19 PM

Okay, can't take it.

22 years active duty. I cannot believe he brought up Mr. Kerry's vietnam service. WE REMEMBER HIS COMMENTS UPON RETURN TO THE STATES. (sorry for the yelling, if am kind of serious about this - seeing a counselor . . .;))

Mike

Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2004 08:20 PM

Perish the thought, P&G - we don't want him back here!

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:20 PM

Forget "Good Hair" or what! Edward is a toddler.

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:20 PM

"The truth"
- Edward litigatorhands

According to who?

Bunnies and puppies...and their DU owners?

Edwards has a why are you picking on me you big bad Halliburton baby-eater look in his eyes that translates even through C-span's fuzzy online feed.

Posted by: rsl at October 5, 2004 08:20 PM

Only half joking here, but on my crappy B&W, Edwards suit is starting to look like a rain slicker. As I thought and posted on the night of the presidential debate, the VP debate would erase the badness of that debate. It's a new race again.

http://cartagodelenda.blogspot.com/2004/09/on-to-vice-presidential-debate.html

Posted by: Matteo at October 5, 2004 08:26 PM

Only half joking here, but on my crappy B&W, Edwards suit is starting to look like a rain slicker. As I thought and posted on the night of the presidential debate, the VP debate would erase the badness of that debate. It's a new race again.

http://cartagodelenda.blogspot.com/2004/09/on-to-vice-presidential-debate.html

Posted by: Matteo at October 5, 2004 08:27 PM

"The best defense is a good offense" Thanks Edwards! You just proved what Bush and co. have been saying.

Posted by: Jim H. at October 5, 2004 08:27 PM

The S corp thing has been around for awhile now. Rush pushed it today during his program.

The way it works is that an S Corp passes through earnings as if it were a partnership. So, instead of paying oneself all in salary, you take your money out as a distribution (similar to dividends, but not taxed first). You don't pay social security or medicare on the distribution.

The problem for Edwards is that medicare money is so large. He was apparently taking about $300k a year in salary, and the rest as a distribution. This was over the ceiling for social security, so no savings there. But he did avoid paying the medicare tax on all that money - which is what Cheney (and Rush) was talking about.

This is well know. I was doing it (at a much lower level, of course) almost 20 years ago as a consultant, before I ever became an attorney.

Posted by: Bruce Hayden at October 5, 2004 08:28 PM

Only half joking here, but on my crappy B&W, Edwards suit is starting to look like a rain slicker. As I thought and posted on the night of the presidential debate, the VP debate would erase the badness of that debate. It's a new race again.

http://cartagodelenda.blogspot.com/2004/09/on-to-vice-presidential-debate.html

Posted by: Matteo at October 5, 2004 08:28 PM

Anyone else noticing that Edwards keeps putting his thumb on his fist and shaking it like Clinton did?

Posted by: Albright at October 5, 2004 08:28 PM

Also, very good questions from the moderator. Lehrer should be ashamed.

Posted by: Matteo at October 5, 2004 08:28 PM

Can't say I'm impressed with Edwards; like Kerry, he is basically dissembling throughout, throwing out bogus facts, bogus numbers, dodging the questions and changing the subject.

Definitely a hands-down win for Cheney, who has been looking rock solid throughout.

Posted by: Fredrik Nyman at October 5, 2004 08:29 PM

Thank God this is over - because if wonder boy mentions we have a plan one more freaking time I am going to throw a beer bottle at the tv

Posted by: kevin at October 5, 2004 08:29 PM

This moderator is terrible. Apparently she's getting all nervous being around John's hair ...

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:29 PM

Expect general panic tomorrow...

Posted by: rsl at October 5, 2004 08:30 PM

Hey, Gwen already knows how the election's going to turn out - apparently just as close as 2000, in spite of some of the EC projections that show Bush getting over 320, which would put him in Clinton '96 range, IIRC.

Posted by: Dave C at October 5, 2004 08:30 PM

FINALLY, someone turning the tables on the flip-flopping BS. Edwards just nailed Cheney for four years of his boss's REAL flipflopping, instead of trying to inflate a few statements, take them out of context and manufacture a flipflop issue.

Posted by: Dave Cullen at October 5, 2004 08:30 PM

No - we'll see a bunch of spineroni's by the media, no doubt Kerrying the water.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:31 PM

In short, these guys -Ed and Kerry, got no plan on how to tackle the world's problem. They are just dancing to the political tunes. To every wave thus showing the inconsistency. Hence these guys aint ripe to take up the reins of power. THEY ARE STILL AMATUERS!!!!

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:32 PM

Kerry and Edwards have been the leaders in opposing bi-partisan efforts in congress.

Posted by: Doug at October 5, 2004 08:32 PM

Kudos to Edwards to keep on trucking, when the man is going to need a SERIOUS shower after this. Cheney will be able to wear the same undershirt tomorrow. That's not just efficient, it's good thinking ahead.

Posted by: Matteo at October 5, 2004 08:33 PM

Amazing job from VP, good job he stayed on the right path and keep his answers in line and right on target. John Edwards, has gone on and on about so many things wrong with USA but not talking what they are going to do.

Posted by: CM at October 5, 2004 08:33 PM

My eyes glaze over when Cheney speaks.

That's not necessarily a bad thing. If you tune out and don't listen to the words, he kind of appears like a wise old man, in this slow, sleep-inducing drone.

But then Edwards jumps in and nails him on the bullshit. He calls him on every piece of crap, and exposes him for the liar he is.

I think it's working heavily to Edwards' favor.

Posted by: Dave Cullen at October 5, 2004 08:33 PM

I wonder what Edwards keeps writing down. Is he drawing pictures? He has been writing furiously through most of this.

Posted by: Jamie at October 5, 2004 08:33 PM

Oh boy ...here comes the good ol boy closer speech by smoothie.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:33 PM

Well done again, Steve. I raise my 5th (or 6th, whatever) glass to you, thanks again for a great bash.

Posted by: Scott P at October 5, 2004 08:33 PM

This is a political bitch slapping by Cheney on Edwards.

Hey Senator is that your mommy calling?

Posted by: seismic at October 5, 2004 08:34 PM

Edwards: "When I was young and growing up ..."

You mean right now, Senator?

Posted by: James at October 5, 2004 08:34 PM

Jamie, he's scribbling has made me not like the split screen. It's too distracting

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:34 PM

Edwards is even condescending about his own father. Sickening.

Posted by: DrSteve at October 5, 2004 08:34 PM

Edward is terrible, worse than Bush

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:34 PM

Mega winks to Steve for the live blogging.

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:35 PM

Dave is smoking something that includes water as a filter . . .

Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2004 08:35 PM

This story is sickening

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:35 PM

Dave are you watching the same debate as the rest of us?????

Posted by: Jim H. at October 5, 2004 08:35 PM

Edwards is now speaking to "the pony tail" guy. "We'll take care of you"

Posted by: Doug at October 5, 2004 08:35 PM

The worst closing remark in all presidential debate.

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:37 PM

Sister Toldjah, I have to agree about the moderator. I'm not sure exactly what her role is supposed to be tonight, but if it's anything beyond simply asking the questions she's definitely not doing it. (And she's made a couple mistakes with asking the questions, too.)

She's certainly not keeping John "Halliburton!" Edwards on topic.

Posted by: Bryan C at October 5, 2004 08:37 PM

By the way. . . .started with a vodka Tonics. Ran out, switched to a good bourbon . . . Knob's Creek if you must ask. Only made the debate much better.

Thanks for hosting my rambling.

Mike

Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2004 08:37 PM

Albright: I noticed Kerry doing that the other day, too. It just looks odd.

Posted by: Nate at October 5, 2004 08:38 PM

I keep thinking of what Jack Palance said to Billy Crystal in "City Slickers". "I crap bigger than you."

Posted by: Pete at October 5, 2004 08:38 PM

Cheney won this debate hands down

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 08:38 PM

Edwards' wrap up:

Seriously, it sounded like a lawyer commercial. "I will get you more money"

Posted by: Amok at October 5, 2004 08:38 PM

"The bright light is flickering."

Sure as hell isn't a shining city on a hill. Defeatist creep.

Fuck you Edwards.

(sorry for the language VP)

Posted by: Captain Mojo at October 5, 2004 08:39 PM

This has been excellent. Thanks all!

Posted by: Sister Toldjah at October 5, 2004 08:46 PM

ALL HAIL CHEYNSAW!!

Brutal performance.

Calm, cool, collected, while he puts the shiv in time and time again.

And I'm sure that PMSNBC & CNN are calling it a virtuoso performance by Ponyboy.

Posted by: JD at October 5, 2004 08:47 PM

Edwards > Quayle.

Posted by: McGehee at October 5, 2004 08:48 PM

On Iran, I'm wondering if it could even be dealt with practicaly without having dealt with Iraq first?

Posted by: aaron at October 5, 2004 08:54 PM

It was a surgical slaughter of Kerry, but I was surprised that Cheney even sliced up Edwards with such little effort.

I don't fault Edwards, he may be an ambulance chaser but I'm sure he believed in his cases. Here he was sent out to defend indefensible Kerry positions with untruths.

He couldn't hide it.

My two cents..

Posted by: vanyogan at October 5, 2004 08:59 PM

re Sandy P,

"NCLB is not a mandate. Schools can opt out and not get the money. It is not really unfunded."

Yeah its not a mandate like breathing isn't a mandate to stay alive. You don't pass the test, you don't get federal money. You don't get the money, you fire 1/3 of your teachers and get fired.

Posted by: nt moore at October 5, 2004 09:03 PM

The strategy to make John Kerry the center of debate will do wonders for Bush. In all we did hear much of much but rather John kerry was constantly hammered by Cheney. Cheney came out top tonight

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:06 PM

Those liberal commentators are calling it a draw. This is a clear sign that Edward did poorly tonight

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:07 PM

re Sandy P,

"NCLB is not a mandate. Schools can opt out and not get the money. It is not really unfunded."

Yeah its not a mandate like breathing isn't a mandate to stay alive. You don't pass the test, you don't get federal money. You don't get the money, you fire 1/3 of your teachers and get fired.

The rest of the world does better on educational standard because they choose to educate only the elite. The US is one of the few countires which tries to educate every student. There is no Abitur in the US - that the real reson for lagging US academic prowess.

For real student achievement, federally mandate class size to less than 20 students and remove the students with emothional behavior disorders form mainstream classrooms. Waving the big stick and threatening "failing" schools is not the way to generate student achievement.

Posted by: nt moore at October 5, 2004 09:08 PM

How about Cheney/Bush?

Cheney tore up the Kerry/Edwards ticket and burned the scraps. Edwards was exposed as a total lightweight, who has barely bothered to show up during his short Senate career. Cheney's line about being President of the Senate and meeting Edwards for the first time at the debate was devestating.

Look for the media spin to downplay the importance of this debate as mere sideshow to try and cover up Edward's shortcomings...

Posted by: Mike M at October 5, 2004 09:09 PM

CNn has already started to down play this debate. What a shame!!! bunch of low lives!!!!

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:12 PM

Though he was praised by the media as one of the best trial lwayers with convincing wits. I didnt see the lawyer in him tonight. I think he was horribly naive

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:14 PM

Wonkette was on NBC doing after comments. She says Cheney definitely took the debate. (if you had stayed sober, Stephen, they might have called you)

Posted by: burt at October 5, 2004 09:22 PM

I would be willing, but do we really need to debate the Iran vrs Iraq thing on a comment of a blog?

Mike

Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2004 09:22 PM

whooo.. it's about time somebody started criticizing Kerry's senate and post Vietnam record, the dems and their allies get really flustered when they have to talk aobut it..

Posted by: The WASP at October 5, 2004 09:22 PM

The Halburton rebuttal is at
http://factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=261

Posted by: Glenda at October 5, 2004 09:29 PM

leaky pants Leahy on hardbull:

agreeing with mathews that 9-11 had nothing to do with Iraq.. al queda was operating in every country in the world but Iraq according to them.. thank god he was kicked off the intel commitee...

it also seems like alot of dems seem to know exactly where bin laden is afganistan, they talk about tora bora like it's as big as the mall on washington, the same people who coulnd't find hillary's billing records in the white house...

Posted by: The WASP at October 5, 2004 09:29 PM

Look from all accounts here in China -they covered this debate live, They clearly gave it to Cheney. Edward wasnt upto the expectation and prediction made by the media. The wits and convincing arguments of a trial lawyer. i didnt see the lawyer in him tonight. I saw a guy who was trying hard to defend his records

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:30 PM

"I preside over the Senate every Tuesday when the Senate is in session. The first time I ever met you is when you walked on the stage tonight."

this is the best line so far in this race.

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:31 PM

How about Cheney/Bush?

The idea isn't new, but the problem is that I don't think Cheney *wants* to be President.

Personally, I'd be delighted to see Cheney/Rice or Cheney/Guiliani in '08. All we have to do is convince Cheney...

Posted by: rosignol at October 5, 2004 09:34 PM

we dont need good hairs in politics, we need good heads. Cheney has shown he is a good head!!

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:39 PM

Hurray for our side!

Posted by: Grub at October 5, 2004 09:45 PM

It's http://wwww.factcheck.org run by the University of Pennsylvania, for Halliburton questions. Cheney wins and Edwards can't quite explain how he became known as "Senator Gone".

Posted by: Amy at October 5, 2004 09:47 PM

It's http://wwww.factcheck.org run by the University of Pennsylvania, for Halliburton questions. Cheney wins and Edwards can't quite explain how he became known as "Senator Gone".

Posted by: Amy at October 5, 2004 09:47 PM

Three candid words for the Dems: "Forget this Election"

Posted by: ByStander at October 5, 2004 09:49 PM

after Bush hammers Kerry on his record and waffles on major issues... then we can put it in the 'lock box'

Posted by: The WASP at October 5, 2004 09:54 PM

after Bush hammers Kerry on his record and waffles on major issues... then we can put it in the 'lock box'

Posted by: The WASP at October 5, 2004 09:55 PM

But Mr. Moore, it's not up to the fed gov to fund the schools, it's up to the state. If they want fed money, they do it the feds' way. Fed rules too onerous, the state will meet the goals another way. Raise taxes, cut spending. How about reviewing all unfunded mandates from say the 60s on, lobby Congress and state legis' to get rid of those then use that money to meet the goals? Yes, NCLB back office stuff needs tweaking, but it' working.

Then we have nonsense like this via Dailypundit:

An increasingly popular grading theory insists red ink is stressful and demoralizes students, while purple, the preferred color, has a more calming effect.

"I never use red to grade papers because it stands out like, 'Oh, here's what you did wrong.' " said Melanie Irvine, a third-grade teacher at Pacific Rim Elementary in Carlsbad. "Purple is a more approachable color."

---

Now we have grading theories????

Posted by: Sandy P at October 5, 2004 10:01 PM

--For real student achievement, federally mandate class size to less than 20 students and remove the students with emothional behavior disorders form mainstream classrooms. Waving the big stick and threatening "failing" schools is not the way to generate student achievement.--

You mean going back to the old ways??? I'd take it even further and group like intelligence together.

Can't have student achievement w/o teacher achievement. That's what you get when you lower teaching standards like they did in the 60s. Look, I'm all for teachers negotiating for what they're worth, they're professionals. But no tenure. No performance you're gone. Same as in the real world.

BTW, sometimes I had 30-37 in my class, I actually can add 2+2 and balance my checkbook w/a calculator and don't need the computer when I choose to do so. And if I had to use a piece of paper and a pencil, I could do that, too.


Posted by: Sandy P at October 5, 2004 10:09 PM

Get over it Dave. Your little boy lost.

Posted by: Ludwig at October 5, 2004 11:05 PM

factcheck.com has been hijacked. I went there, and it sent me to GeorgeSoros.com, and I AM NOT KIDDING!! So, this is how the dems. handle Cheney getting out the truth about Halliburton.

Posted by: Kiki B. at October 5, 2004 11:16 PM

Whew, Whew and triple WHEW! I just did FACTCHECK.ORG, instead of .com, and it's working just fine. Make sure you get the right ending on the addy. :-), or you risk making a fool out of yourself like I did...Lol.

Posted by: Kiki B. at October 5, 2004 11:25 PM

A little discussed fact on Halliburton is that that their main competitor in the energy business is the French company Schlumberger. Jamie Gorelick, a member of the 9/11 commission and chief democrat Bush critic just happens to be on Schlumberger's board of directors! She owns some of their stock. A former clinton CIA director, John Deutch, is also on the board of directors. You won't hear this on CBS folks.

Check it out...
http://investorcenter.slb.com/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=slb&script=2260

Posted by: vanyogan at October 6, 2004 01:55 AM

I'm changing my vote away from Bush, Cheney was great ... I need a new bumper sticker ...

"Cheney 2004"

Posted by: Brett at October 6, 2004 02:30 AM

Mateo: "Kudos to Edwards to keep on trucking, when the man is going to need a SERIOUS shower after this. Cheney will be able to wear the same undershirt tomorrow. That's not just efficient, it's good thinking ahead."

What more can I say. Well I can't say anything because I can't stop LOL at this comment.


Posted by: Jim R at October 6, 2004 07:49 AM

Kiki, not your fault. I think Cheney said .com.

Posted by: aaron at October 6, 2004 09:15 AM

It seems only the most far-left moonbats are calling the debate for Kerry, so here's my report card.

Style - Cheney B+ (loved the low-key manner, this guy rocks) Edwards B- (had a few likeable moments)

Substance - Cheney A Edwards C (The only good points by the latter were the AIDS thing and the Israel-Palestine discussion)

Likeability - Cheney B+ Edwards B

Class - Cheney A Edwards B- (would've been a B+ if not for THAT DAMN COFFEE MUG!)

So, Cheney won, and no amount of spinning is gonna erase that. Ooh-rah!

Posted by: Chris S. at October 6, 2004 04:41 PM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"He’s always mentioning food and drink I have never heard of, yet I am still compelled to read."
-Steven Taylor

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori