![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well?
Posted by Stephen Green · 4 August 2004
George Will has questions for John Kerry. Here are a few of them: Regarding military action, your platform says "we will never wait for a green light from abroad when our safety is at stake." But the platform's preceding paragraph denounces President Bush's "doctrine of unilateral preemption." If unilateralism is wrong, are you not committed to some sort of "green light from abroad"? And Your platform says: "A nuclear-armed Iran is an unacceptable risk." But Iran's radical Islamist regime is undeterred by diplomatic hand-wringing about its acquisition of nuclear weapons, which may be imminent. Is preemptive military action against Iran feasible, or are its nuclear facilities too dispersed and hardened? What would you do other than accept Iran as a nuclear power? (Hell, I'd like to know what the current President would do.) Your platform says, "The price of gas is at an all-time high." But it isn't as measured in constant (inflation-adjusted) dollars, or as a portion of Americans' purchasing power. Do you have some other way of justifying the platform's claim? Uh. . . Throwing caution to the wind, your platform insists that "small towns are at the heart of America." Your sense of America's small-town heartbeat comes from where -- Sun Valley? Heh. Comments
One other question that Kerry needs to answer concerns US dependency on foreign oil. In his commercial they are playing locally (Seattle), he states that the U.S. MUST reduce its dependence on foreign oil. Yet, why did he vote against oil exploration in the empty steppes of Alaska known as ANWAR. Posted by: David Crawford at August 4, 2004 11:14 PMSun Valley? No-o-o-o. Aspen. Posted by: CapitalF at August 4, 2004 11:24 PMKerry's Secret Plan is called "Fortress America". Isolationist policies will make the US safe. "Bring the troops home" is more than simply bugging out of Iraq. The more one reads the Kerry Speech and listens to the daily Soundbites the more one hears the past calling us to the safety of our shores. Sad, we never learn and it always costs more young Marines. Whenever we retreat behind our shores and focus on our silly bits, the enemy grows bigger, stronger and more evil. From the Kaiser to Hitler/Tojo to Stalin, each iteration has been a bloodier monster. Posted by: Andy at August 4, 2004 11:54 PMAs to pre-emption strike against Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, banish the thought. Here's Kerry's ingenuious response: http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/national_security/strategy.html "John Kerry's proposal would call their bluff by organizing a group of states to offer Iran the nuclear fuel they need for peaceful purposes and take back the spent fuel so they cannot divert it to build a weapon. If Iran does not accept this offer, their true motivations will be clear...If this process fails, we must lead the effort to ensure that the IAEA takes this issue to the Security Council for action." Posted by: ic at August 5, 2004 12:47 AM"Sad, we never learn and it always costs more young Marines. Whenever we retreat behind our shores and focus on our silly bits, the enemy grows bigger, stronger and more evil. From the Kaiser to Hitler/Tojo to Stalin, each iteration has been a bloodier monster." Which leads to the policy recommendation: The young Marine will be searching for Dragons like the once famed medieval Knights. If he encounters one and is quick enough he'll kill it. If not (unfortunately there are always some with slow reflexes), he'll be devoured by it. In that case luckily it won't happen on your shores. Imagine that bloody mess on TV! Posted by: The Old European at August 5, 2004 02:15 AMSteve, while you might want to know what the present administration will do, I have to remind you that such knowledge is costly. Myself, I would be happy to find out afterwards, so as to avoid telegraphing our intentions to the mullahs. If you and I don't know, its harder for the mullahs in Iran to know, and that means if it is a military option, its less risky for our troops and pilots. And if Bush has some other way of going about it, well, all the better as long as it works. If he needs secrecy to pull it off, let him have it. If he needs to make it public, well, I am sure he will Posted by: Ben at August 5, 2004 03:18 AMOne does have to drive through East Boston to get to Logan Airport ... Posted by: MartiniPundit at August 5, 2004 08:37 AMIf it weren't an election year, I'd think a surigical strike of B-2's with ground-penetrating bombs would send just the right message. More of a "we don't think you should continue to go there" than a "we are about to invade you." The down side would be that it might deflate the mullas just enough to let the steam out of the freedom movement. Or, it might energize the movement just enough to get them to act. You can bet that what ever they do next spring (after W wins re-election) will be coordinated with the opposition. Posted by: Dacotti at August 5, 2004 10:27 AM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"...the Internet version of Playboy After Dark"
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |