VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Car Talk
Posted by Stephen Green  ·  21 February 2004

The VodkaFamily car-buying experience continues.

Last night we went to the local Jeep-Chrysler dealer to test drive the Liberty, Grand Cherokee, and the Pacifica.

One look told us everything we needed to know about the Liberty -- too small to be the hauler Melissa needs. So we didn't even ask to drive it. If the back seats need to go down just to make a trip to Sam's Club, and you've got two adults in front. . . then what, the baby has to ride on the luggage rack? Bad enough the little un(?)conceived bugger will get his first sunburn at six months, riding around town in daddy's convertible.

Melissa drove the Grand Cherokee Limited around the way, and was impressed. Nice ride, pretty damn good pick-up for a medium-size SUV (thanks to the 4.7 liter V-8), and the leather is first rate. I’ve driven GCs a bunch, so I didn’t bother with a test drive. Instead, I sat in back and enjoyed the ride.

Except for one small detail. It’s true that the back seat has plenty of leg room, even for me. I’m not very tall, but what height I do have is mostly legs. And that’s the rub. The GC – or any SUV – is built for clearance. So plenty of leg room doesn’t mean there’s plenty of room for your legs to go, well, down. I spent the drive dodging my kneecaps. Is it a dealbreaker? Probably not – I won’t be riding in back a whole lot. But some of our tall friends will, and that’s something to think about.

Overall? It’s a Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited, and that makes it a pretty damn fine truck.

Most surprising was the Pacifica. We took the front-wheel drive version out, because they’d sold the last of the AWDs. We both took turns behind the wheel, Melissa first. Again, I sat in back.

First impression? Even from the back (actually, middle row) seat, the thing feels like a luxury car. The leather looks and feels right out of a Lexus, and the second-row captain’s chairs made it feel like I was sitting up front – none of this knees-around-the-chin action. Nice. The seats themselves felt like they came out of a Mercedes E-class sedan. The might be too stiff for some, but I like the German seating.

Some of the interior chrome (door handles, for example) looked a little cheap, but mostly, the interior just looks and feels luxurious.

This being the front-wheel drive model, pick-up wasn’t was bad as I’d feared. You wouldn’t mistake it for a sports car, or even an eight-cylinder SUV, but it gets the job done. And the Mercedes five-speed automatic transmission was smooth and quiet, even up a long, steep hill at 50 mph.

We still have the Explorer, Magnum, Trailblazer, and Durango to try out. More reports over the next few weeks.

Comments

My wife and I tried everything, and settled on Buick Rendezvous. Not bad, but we would rather have had the Tahoe or Yukon.

Posted by: Genuine at February 21, 2004 05:35 PM

Forget the Explorer! My sister's Explorer spontaneously combusted in their garage just before Christmas. Just about burned the whole house down. Ford said sorry. That was it. It was a faulty carburator (?) and Ford admitted that it was a known problem but short of a small reimbursement check that didn't even cover the cost of the car that was all they had to say.

Skip the Ford and go right to the Pacifica!

Posted by: cooper at February 21, 2004 09:15 PM

So, while you were shopping, we were buying... yes, the rover is gone and we now have a new saturn (yes, i know that hardly compares to a ne SUV of any flavor!) But, alas, Matt got his first brand new car ever, so yay.
By the way, did I mention that I got into vet school???!!!???!!!

~A

Posted by: Ali at February 21, 2004 10:34 PM

I've put 30,000 miles on a company Cherokee in the last year (a 2000 Sport) and my one complaint is that the harsh ride gets to me on a long drive like the 150 miles I have to run yet tonite. No proof, but I suspect it caused my eyeball floater problem. The Grand may have a little different damping, but I would suggest you look into this before deciding.

Posted by: triticale at February 21, 2004 11:37 PM

Don't get leather seats w/the tax deduction.

The car seat and baby droppings will ruin them.

Posted by: sandy P. at February 22, 2004 12:11 AM

Sandy P: Don't get leather seats ... The car seat and baby droppings will ruin them.

We've found that leather works well with a baby. After 3 years, our BMW w/ black leather needs just a wipe with a wet cloth to remove dried milk and crumbs. Don't place the car seat directly on leather, but on a towel or better yet a square of slightly sticky plastic mesh like that used to hold carpets.

Still waiting for an opinion: would buying the DaimlerChrysler PT Cruiser violate the Axis of Weasel Boycott? Do we still need to boycott Germany, or are they behaving better?

Posted by: annelid at February 22, 2004 01:27 AM

http://happycarpenter.blogs.com/the_happy_carpenter/2004/02/like_the_vodka_.html

Maybe you should broaden your search. SUV's are OK, but why not something besides that Rx8 to put a smile on VodkaWife's face?

Posted by: pedro at February 22, 2004 04:08 AM

The daughter picked the Pacifica because it was not a mini-van (not a babe vehicle). Perfect for her new family of three. Has the luxury car ambiance. Very happy with her choice abetted by the fact that dealers are dealing with selling this car.

Posted by: philw at February 22, 2004 09:50 AM

I have owned three Expeditions and may not ever drive another vehicle. They are awesome. Give it a try.

Posted by: David at February 22, 2004 11:23 AM

The new Trailblazers are fabulous, never expected something so nice when I first climbed in. OnStar might be a feature to consider for emergencies, reallt revolutonary.

Posted by: Timbeaux at February 22, 2004 02:13 PM

Try the Lexus SUV- my friend bought one and it is just a fantastic car.

Posted by: John Cole at February 22, 2004 02:28 PM

Stephen,
A couple of observations. Buying anything new is a money-losing proposition, the depreciation will kill ya. And, getting a domestic just because there is an affinity deal may be a false economy in the long run. Free country, the choice is yours.

SUV's are hogs to drive, and not much fun. Pacifica is really a minivan that weighs too much. Magnum might be interesting (can't beat a wagon for practicality, see Audi Avants & Saab 9-5 wagons for proof), but pretty unknown at this point.

Jeeps are service problems for every owner I know, and there is a new Grand Cherokee due before year end.

Personally, I would ride the depreciation curve differently, a three or four year old Volvo wagon, Saab 9-5, or Passat wagon can be had cheap and with normal care will last forever, at a much lower total cost to buy and own.

Spending my own money on new, it would probably be a very reliable crossover, like Honda Pilot or Toyota Highlander. Those would beat any of the domestics on total cost to own, even after Melissa's discount, and be more fun to drive.

Your money, your choice. Have fun deciding!

Posted by: Seppo at February 22, 2004 05:57 PM

We have an '02 Trailblazer. Great truck. Fine ride, very powerful, and decent gas mieage. Have taken two 3,000+ mile trips, and get about 22 mpg. With 275 HP. You can't touch that with a Chrysler or anything else comparable. 30,000 miles now with minimal problems. Run Mobil 1 and change every 11-12,000 miles. And something you haven't mentioned--price. We have the LS with all option packages (AC,Cruise, PW/PL, CD etc), and paid $22,000. I thought of getting one for me too, but drive 185 miles per day in my commute and want better mileage. We have the dark green. Color wears well too.

Posted by: Loren Svor at February 22, 2004 06:45 PM

I still say you should hold out for the Saabaru / Subaraab. Saab is 100% owned by GM, and Subaru is an equity affiliate (I think GM owns around 10%.) It will be badged as a Saab, and I know that Saabs qualify for GM employee discounts.

Posted by: Chris at February 22, 2004 10:33 PM

Can I ask one little question here? Why an SUV? Are you going to be doing a lot of off-roading? Is there a reason that a more fuel-efficient vehicle that would do less damage to others in an accident wouldn't be acceptable? I know it's the God-given right of all of us true-blue Republicans to drive monolithic vehicles that swallow oceans worth of sweet fertile crescent crude on subsidized highways, but just because we can, do we have to?

I suppose one more on the road can't hurt. But it might be nice for our air, for our trade balance, for our insurance bills, for our appetite for middle eastern oil, and for our ability to see past other vehicles on the road if there were a few less.

Whatever you decide, I recommend against the Explorer. I had one, and the ride was brutal, the check engine light was the one thing in my life I could count on, the brakes bailed on me every nine months or so, and I had to rip the alarm wires out with pliers to get the thing to shut off. (If your hypocrisy detector just went off, reset it. I bought it in Virginia to take to Haiti, where 4WD is a survival mechanism.)

Good luck.

Posted by: ben at February 23, 2004 12:35 AM

Not enough room in the Liberty?? And to think our parents struggled with all those kids and so little car. It was probably uphill both ways to the Sam's Club then, too.

Posted by: C. S. Froning at February 23, 2004 07:28 AM

I boiught a Pacifica last month, like it a lot. My situation's a little different from yours, my 'baby' is 22. I agree with Seppo that it's just a minivan masquerading as an SUV.

Posted by: Steevil(Dr Weevil's bro Steve) at February 23, 2004 07:56 AM

Steve, you need to ask yourself: What Would Jesus Drive? In my neighborhood, Jesus (the latino kid who works at Taco Bell) drives an early '90s Integra with a giant exhaust pipe.

Posted by: Chris at February 23, 2004 08:39 AM

Stephen:
I have owned four Explorers, starting with the very first of the Explorers, a '91, and loved every one of them. Beginning in 2002, they have independent rear suspension, and the ride and handling have been transformed! In approximately 400,000 miles of driving, I have had exactly one warranty claim. Explorer interiors are generally nicer than those of the Jeep family. My current 2003 gets 22mpg routinely. At least half that distance was driven on the much-maligned Firestone tires, in summer on the desert southwest, and in *my* experience these were the best tires I have ever ridden on.

Posted by: Clyde at February 23, 2004 10:50 AM

3 comments:

a: must get leather... between having friends lose control nights when i was dd, to the dogs and them getting carsick, spewing hair everywhere, etc leather can handle anything.. it doesn't even tear or scratch as much as you'd think

b: ive always owned jeeps, and always had good luck with them... inherited a cherokee that i drove into the ground (10 yrs, 250K miles).. everything was fine except that the brakes rusted off (canadian winters are not nice to underbodies of cars... salt is used in mass quantities due to repeated freeze thaws...) currently working on a 6 year old gc that has 150k miles on it.. it's been from toronto to california several times, lots of constrution sites and mountains... takes on anything

c: as im sure you know, gc just aren't that big. sure i can get the thing really full, but it requires putting down the back seat (at least the 60/40) which you can't do in any fashion with a car seat. get a sub or a navigator for the cargo room (or maybe the avalanche or envoy xuv)... much better for all purposes... i'd avoid the pickups, as you need to shovel them out and you CS kids see a bunch of snow

Posted by: hey at February 23, 2004 11:59 AM

When you get a bit more information and start to narrow your list down, be sure to go to intellichoice.com and compare the ownership cost estimates of your choices. You might be suprised to see that unless your discounts put the price well below dealer cost that there are some other brands that you might want to consider.
Have fun and Good Luck!

Posted by: Don at February 23, 2004 12:46 PM

If you are thinking about the Trailblazer, look at the GMC Envoy. The differences bring it pretty close to the Avalanche, but in a bit smaller frame. The midgate, great for containing messy stuff in the back, power mid and rear glass and power rear roof retract. I don't know how it rides, but the Avalanche I have rides better than any truck I have ever been in. Or, if you need the full size truck room, look at the Avalanche itself. Due to Factory transmission choice, be really careful in Towing Load Capacity.

Posted by: John Palmer at February 23, 2004 07:35 PM

If you haven't already, VP, you might have a look at the New Car Test Drive site,
www.nctd.com.

Posted by: Clyde at February 24, 2004 08:26 AM

As an ex-used car salesman, I have one piece of advice.
Friends don't let friends drive Chryslers. Unless you plan on keeping it less than 4 years. Check out 5 year old Chryslers when you are looking at new ones.
You'll see; squeaks, rattles, fluid leaks, a very lengthy service history and an amazing drop in value. There's a reason used Chryslers are cheap.
I stopped liking Chrysler in 1973. 1972 and earlier were some of the finest automobiles ever. Chrysler never figured out the catalytic converter. Too bad.
I'm a Honda person myself, but I like Ford and GM trucks. My brother sold Chryslers and he and his boyfriend bought a Durango. They hated it.
If you aren't dead set against imports, check out the Nissan Armada. It's about the same price as the Pacifica, but nicer. Lots of room and amenities.

Posted by: Veeshir at February 24, 2004 09:17 AM

Our family recently got bigger, however, we we're up to five, not three. When we went looking for a new vehicle (two carseats and a 6 year old with two adults don't fit in a pickup very well) we looked at the Explorer, Expedition, Durange, and Sequoia. We ended up with the Sequoia with leather. The leather for the reasons listed above. It's much easier to clean when the kids spill stuff on it than cloth is. The main thing though, was the options the seating gave us in the Sequoia that the others didn't. It has the 3rd row, which is good for keeping the "He/She's touching me" to a minimum, and the third row is a 50/50 split, that comes out completely. This allows us to leave one of the car seats on the third row while still giving us room for all the stuff a baby and a toddler add to the luggage required for a trip to grandma's. Also by having a 50/50 split, one person can get the third row out, unlike my sister-in-law's Expedition. It takes two people to get the third row seat out of her truck. The middle row is a 60/40 split that folds up for even mroe room if you need it. This may not be real important to you now, though, but this was our reasons for choosing what we did.

Posted by: Mark at February 24, 2004 09:33 AM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"A top blogger, even if he doesn’t spell his first name properly."
-Steven Taylor

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori