![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Gotcha?
Posted by Stephen Green · 29 January 2004
Are we closing in on Osama (or his remains)? Maybe: Military spokesman Lt Col Bryan Hilferty said the military now believed it could seize him within months. I've done a little digging through the archives here, but can't find any other reference to a US Army officer sounding that confident about getting bin Laden. Anyone's memory better than mine? Comments
Seems to be a message the command is pushing pretty hard. Posted by: Joe at January 29, 2004 02:41 PMNo, no better memory on that. But I do remember an AQ spokesman saying in early 2003 that OBL would become a martyr in 2003. I'm with you though, Stephen. I think any so-called martyrdom happened in 2001. Posted by: denise at January 29, 2004 04:55 PMI find this very surprising. Politicians pulls this kind of stunt ("Peace is just around the corner" "There is a light at the end of the tunnel"), the military doesn't. Posted by: Bill Peschel at January 29, 2004 06:28 PMOf course, this could also be a part of the psychological war they're playing with OBL. In fact, that's the way I would bet. In this scenario, they'll use their ability to monitor cellphone/e-mail communications and trace how the word is spreading. They may have no idea at all where OBL is, but they'll find out this way. Posted by: Bill Peschel at January 29, 2004 06:31 PMI don't remember any specific quotes or have any links, but I seem to remember some optiomism at Tora Bora that later proved unfounded. Still this is unusual commentary from a military man... his mouth is writing a pretty big check, let's hope it gets cashed. Personally, I think he was buried in secret years ago, so he can be an Elvis like legend inspiring martyrs for years after his death. I would love to be wrong though. Posted by: MarkD at January 29, 2004 07:19 PMMy assumption -- actually, it's more than that, I'm absolutely dead sure of it -- is that they're using the same contacts matrix software they used to find Saddam -- I blogged about this, though I'm not going to look it up for anyone right now. And they feel they're getting closer and closer to bin Laden via it the same way they correctly felt they were closing in on Saddam. This would also seem to suggest extremely strongly that those who said he was dead were, of course, wrong. I wouldn't count chickens before they're hatched, but it's not bad news. Posted by: Gary Farber at January 29, 2004 08:53 PMActually I am not sure if it would be good if he is caught (provided he is still alive). I am afraid that there would be a tremendous pressure about "we caught him, we won the war on terror, finish it". Terror Inc. is far bigger than Garbage bin Laden. He is only one, albeit big, piece of a huge puzzle, and I don't believe that after his death (or proof of it) other terrorists would say "oh, ok, then let's go home". Vilmos Big deal. Usama would no longer be a threat, even if it does nothing about all the other jihadis out there. Catch him, and boil him in bacon grease. Its still better than he deserves. And that would send a message to all the others. Posted by: Ben at January 30, 2004 01:31 AMI didn't like it when Clark made his little no-terrorism promise, and I don't much care for this either. While it's devoutly to be wished that bin Laden is already a coat of interior paint in a cave somewhere, it would be nice to perp-walk him (although my own suggestion involves a helicopter, lower Manhattan and an open hatch). Posted by: DrSteve at January 30, 2004 07:39 AMSquad Leader: Report, soldier! Foot Soldier1: Uh...we got a leg, sir. Foot Soldier2: And a beard. Foot Soldier1: Shut up! I wanted to keep that! |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"3 out of 4 large mammals choose VodkaPundit."
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |