VodkapunditVodkapunditVodkapundit
Rough Justice
Posted by Stephen Green  ·  21 March 2003

The Turks are moving into Iraqi Kurd areas.

A Turkish commando force of around 1,500 men crossed into northern Iraq (news - web sites) on Friday night, a precursor to eventual larger deployment, a Turkish military official told Reuters.

The United States has told Turkey it would not welcome a large unilateral Turkish incursion into northern Iraq, where Kurdish authorities are suspicious of Turkish motives.

Turkey says it needs troops in Iraq to control refugees and forestall any attempt to create a Kurdish state.

Kurdish groups have said they will resist any Turkish invasion.

Having pissed away overly-generous offers of US aid, and taxed American goodwill, Turkey will now have to pay for their mini invasion out of their own pockets.

And in the end, they still won't control Kurdistan or the Mosul oil fields. Serves'em right.

Comments

Yeah, but are we willing to stop them if they try?

Posted by: Henry at March 21, 2003 05:18 PM

We better be. I had a strong feeling that was what they were planning. That kind of opportunism sickens me. If they think they can buy northern Iraq with American blood they are sorely mistaken.

Posted by: Chaos Overlord at March 21, 2003 05:28 PM

This is gonna suck.

What do the Turks exactly plan to accomplish? Control them? Fight and exterminate the Kurdish population of Northern Iraq? This smells of the worst opportunism but to what ends?

Someone please enlighten me on this bonehead move.


Posted by: UncleDuke at March 21, 2003 05:29 PM

Let's see. They've just pissed away any chance of joining the European Union at any point in the next 50 years.

Greek Cyprus will join the EU and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus will be marginalised even more.

If they persist in such foolishness, they may even be sanctioned from NATO.

I wonder what the Greeks are thinking of this?

--Shawn Pickrell

Posted by: Shawn Pickrell at March 21, 2003 05:50 PM

As an ignorant American, I tend to be sympathetic to the Kurds. Can't say exactly why. But somehow I feel other ignorant Americans will have the same sympathy. There's something about those feisty little buggers, PKK notwithstanding.

If the Turks come in busting heads, it's not going to go well for them. Kurdistan, baby!

Posted by: dipnut at March 21, 2003 05:57 PM

Either, the Turks have stones the size of footballs or they are stooopid. Or both.

Posted by: UncleDuke at March 21, 2003 06:06 PM

Both I think. Kirkuk is the prize here, 10 Billion barrel oil reserves, at $20-50/barrel, is $200-$500 billion...a bit more than our aid package.

So if the Turks try for Kirkuk, at some economic level it's a rational move, but on balance, it will be very foolish.

Worst case: Kurds and 101st Airborne slugging it out with Turkish troops in Kirkuk.

I give that very low odds of happening, but it's not totally beyond the pale.

Posted by: David Mercer at March 21, 2003 06:42 PM

This really worries me. I do not believe we will try to dislodge them with threats. And I've really been concerned about our talk of ONE Iraq. From what little I know about the situation, the Kurds are at least as deserving of a homeland as the Palastinians (and the Israeli's for that matter I guess). The Turks seem pretty hard up to prevent that. Looks like more diplomacy problems to sadden Tom Daschle. It really sucks.


Posted by: Russ Goble at March 21, 2003 06:44 PM

If we have to vaporize Turkish troops in order to prevent them from massacreing Kurds, let me register my approval in advance.

I know the costs of doing so would be enormous, but the costs of *not* doing so would be inconceivable.

Posted by: Chuckg at March 21, 2003 06:56 PM

Right. That very thought occurred to me when I heard that Turkey was moving into the Kurdish area. "If the Palestinians are deserving of a state, why aren't the Kurd?"

In fact, the Kurds have a better claim than the Pals--seeing as they already have a functional government.

Posted by: ray at March 21, 2003 06:57 PM

If we're going to discuss nightmare scenarios, wouldn't any Turkish armor be extremely susceptible to attack from the air, if they moved on Kirkuk? Would the Turks really risk their entire Air Force in an attempt to provide air cover? How fast can the air wings be scrambled from Incrilik, if things turn bad. That'll be the sign that the feces has hit the fan; if the planes at Incrilik bug out, or even more astoundingly, the Turks attempt to seize them. I know, I know, I must be drinking the cheap Scotch, but war has a way of producing what was previously thought impossible. I don't think many in the very pleasant European summer of 1914 thought the ensuing years would see the annihilation of an entire generation. Would the Turks really risk their entire geo-political alignment in pursuit of a goal that is a one in a thousand risk? I hope this is simply idle worry.

Posted by: Will Allen at March 21, 2003 07:06 PM

Well, if we had to fight the Turks, we'd be toast. Remember, we don't have any sort of armor in the North, and air support has to come all the way from the west. The Turks would have both.

That's why the Turks are doing this. They know there's nothing we could do about it, even if we wanted to.

I have to say, if nothing else, this has shown who the US's friends are.

Posted by: Jeremy at March 21, 2003 10:11 PM

The retired generals don't seem to see this as too serious. The Turks have forces this size in Northern Iraq a lot.

Their military may be tough, but they'd be stupid to get in the way. We may have some Shock and Awe left over if the Iraqis collapse, as is starting to look more possible all the time. We've already made the point that the oil is the property of the Iraqi people. Saddam may be dead. The leaks are that we have evidence that he was pulled out of the rubble with "frantic digging" and carried away on a stretcher. There are reports that his generals are packing to leave Baghdad. If things are this bad for Saddam's regime, I don't think anybody else in the vicinity should feel like trying to move into the vacuum, while our blood is up.

The Turks have just passed up 20 or 30 billion, do they really want to make it worse by poking the 800 lb gorilla with a sharp stick?

Posted by: AST at March 21, 2003 11:09 PM

The Turks are moving into northern Iraq. Is that an attack on or a threat against American forces? Probably not - it is the Kurds they are after. If the Iraqis or Kurds defend themselves against this intrusion, so what. But what would it mean in the context of NATO, if a third party (Iran? US?) tried to counter these operations with force?

BTW, even if all third parties remained neutral, I'd expect casualties among US soldiers in the tens of thousands if there was a full scale confrontation between Turkey and the US. Turkish military is quite different from the Iraqi, plus they play on their home turf.
So there is no realistic option to stop them from whatever they want to do at the moment. Of course they are are risking quite a lot in terms of economic relations and integration into the EU - but the Kurdish question has been their top priority for decades.

With every Turkish soldier in Iraq, the probability of a change of mind in the Iranian government rises. I guess they'll not sit silently at the sideline should Turkey try to establish a protectorate of its own.

Let's hope the Turks restrict themselves - somehow I doubt it...

Posted by: Axel at March 22, 2003 01:03 AM

well if i were the turks, i wouldn't want to really try this... the US has a fair number of bases that are massively well stocked (likely with bottled sunshine)

and the us can take out tanks via the air really freaking well.. as can light infantry (marines say that tank killing is fun and easy!)

they will calm down fast.. the US can make it very hard on them, very fast, and they'd be stupid to push it

Posted by: Bugs Bunny at March 22, 2003 03:22 PM

Unfortunately, it looks like the Turks have adopted a Bush Doctrine of their own. I find it extremely unlikely that the US will attack Turkish troops, even if they roll all the way through to the Mosul oil fields.

They passed up $30B because they knew they could hold out for $100B to end the slaughter of the Kurds.

Posted by: Dogmatix at March 22, 2003 06:18 PM

well, there is a point to be seriously considered. turks have been in the area (northern iraq) for about 10 or 15 years (for the fight against PKK). they are well familiarized with the region and its people. their troops are very experienced. i do not think that they want a conflict with US but if it occurs, Turks will be a very tough opponent - unlike iraqis

Posted by: orko_8 at February 13, 2004 01:32 PM



Navigation

MDS - Give Until It Hurts

Terror War Scorecard
Watching America

50 Things
American Cancer Ablation Center
Buy VodkaPundit Stuff



VodkaPundit on Amazon
Vodkapundit for PDA (AvantGo)
Vodkapundit for PDA (Not)
VodkaPundit XML or RDF

Search



Advanced Search



Last Call

The Author

"So this is what he does in his office all day?"
-Melissa Green

Absolut Link

Blog-Iran

Top Shelf

Ann Althouse
Baldilocks
Austin Bay
Belmont Club
Tim Blair
Chequer Board
Command Post
Counterterrorism Blog
Day By Day
Daniel Drezner
From the Bleachers
Hit & Run
INDC Journal
Iraq the Model
James Joyner
James Lileks
Megan McArdle
OPFOR
Protein Wisdom
Glenn Reynolds
Bill Roggio
ScreedBlog
Roger L. Simon
Rob Smith
Steven Taylor
Venomous Kate
Matt Welch
Winds of Change
Michael Yon
Yuppies of Zion


The Usual

Across the Atlantic
Anticipatory Retaliation
Atlas Shrugs
The Black Republican
Blogcritics
Captain's Quarters
Phil Carter
The Daily Ablution
Andrew Ian Dodge
Eye on the Left
Mike Hendrix
In From the Cold
Charles Johnson
Kathy Kinsley
A Likely Story
Brian Linse
Jay Manifold
Neocon News
Frank Martin
QandO
Bill Quick
Rantburg
John Scalzi
Sine Qua Non Pundit
Team Stryker
Mac Thomason
Michael Totten
Jesse Walker
Dr. Weevil
Bill Whittle
Chief Wiggles
Sissy Willis
Cathy Young

Micro Brews

American Realpolitik
Black Five
Boots and Sabers
Capitalist Lion
Scott Chaffin
John Cole
Coming Anarchy
Bo Cowgill
Dr. Frank's Blogs of War
Donklephant
Ed Driscoll
Kim du Toit
Glenn Frazier
Joe Gandleman
The Gay Patriot
Godless Capitalist
Bill Hobbs
John Hudock
Frank J.'s IMAO
Joanne Jacobs
Brothers Judd
Junk Yard Blog
Major John
Davids Medienkritik
Mr. Misha's Rottweiler
Only Baseball Matters
Matt Moore
Jack O'Toole
Peaktalk
Eric S. Raymond
Red Sugar
Resurrection Song
Robin Roberts
Andrea See
Mathew Sheren
Spoons Experience
DC Thornton
Yankee Station

Gin & Tonic

Albion's Seedlings
American Digest
Radley Balko
Paul Berger
Robert Bidinotto
Blogometer
BusinessPundit
The Chicago Boyz
Classical Values
Conrad the Expat
Susanna Cornett
Dave Cullen
England's Sword
Dean Esmay
Horsefeathers
Jessica's Well
Alex Knapp
Legal Spin
Light of Reason
The Lipstick Republican
Moxie
OxBlog
Suman Palit
Punch the Bag
The Pursuit of Happiness
Samizdata
Sofia Sideshow
Natalie Solent
Texas Best Grok
Professor Michael Tinkler
Cal Ulmann
Brothers Volokh

Cosmopolitans

Justene Adamec
Stephen Bainbridge
La Shawn Barber
Moira Breen
Sasha Castel
Colorado Psycho
Clayton Cramer
CrossingWallStreet
Martin Devon
Kevin Drum
Henry Hanks
Diana Hsieh
Jeff Jarvis
Jessica
Sean Kirby
Liberty Belles
Rachel Lucas
Jeralyn Merritt
Philip Murphy
Oasis of Sanity
Andrew Olmsted
Walter Olson
Michael Parker
Popped Culture
Porphyrogenitus
Fritz Schrank
Donald Sensing
Elizabeth Spiers
The Swanky Conservative
Two Blowhards
Michael Ubaldi
Alexandra von Maltzan
Will Wilkinson

Rum & Coke

The Argument Clinic
Below the Beltway
The Bitch Girls
Jay Caruso
Dog's Life
Fire On The Mountain
GeckoBlue
GZ Expat
David Hogberg
John Hawkins
Horologium
Kris Lofgren
Floyd McWilliams
John Moore
PhotoDude
Robyn Pollman
Chas Rich
Silflay Hraka
Geitner Simmons
Skippy
Dave Tepper
Transterrestrial Musings
Trying to Grok
Walter in Denver
Don Watkins
Weekend Pundit
Joshua Zader

Tequila Shots

Todd A
N.Z. Bear
Begging to Differ
David MSC
Gary Farber
Highered Intelligence
Isntapundit
Jonathan and Wanda
Ken Layne
Nick Marsala
Dan Michalski
Sheila O'Malley
Dawn Olsen
Tony Pierce
Raving Atheist
Matt Traylor
Sekimori
WMET Blog
World Wide Rant

Manischewitz

Moe Freedman
Tal G. in Jerusalem
IsraPundit
Kesher Talk
Mike Silverman
Allison Kaplan Sommer
Meryl Yourish

Boozehounds

Allah Is In the House
Dave Barry's Blog
The Daily Sedative
Doug Dever
Daniel Frank
Scott Ott
Large American Penis
Short Strange Trip
Ten Fingers, Six Strings
Jim Treacher

Cyanide-Laced Kool-Aid

Laurence Simon

Sex on the Beach

Body in Mind
ErosBlog
Eroticalee
Just One Bite
Fred Lapides
New York Hotties
SLA
Unablogger

Kegger

Ben Domenech
HokiePundit
Hoosier Review
John Tabin
Nicholas West

Fosters

Duck Season
Mike Jericho
John Ray
Bernard Slattery
Whacking Day

Molson

Banana Counting Monkey
Daimnation!
Dispatches
David Janes
Western Standard

Left Wing Bar Nuts

Ted Barlow
Joshua Marshall
Dan Perkins

Cover Charge

Eric Alterman
Dave Barry
Barone Blog
Austin Bay
Jay Bryant
C-Log
Campaign Desk
Steve Chapman
Dallas News Blog
Matt Drudge
Google News
Nat Henthoff
Hugh Hewitt
Mickey Kaus
Howard Kurtz
National Review Online
The New Republic
The New York Times
Newsweek
OpinionJournal
Kathleen Parker
Daniel Pipes
Virginia Postrel
Roll Call
Larry Sabato
Linda Seebach
Slate
Sploid
Mark Steyn
StrategyPage
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
Tech Central Station
Time
US News & World Report
David Warren
The Washington Post

Under the Table

American Times
Angry Left
Asparagirl
BitchPundit
John Braue
Shiloh Bucher
Carthaginian Peace
Lorenzo Cortes
Steven Den Beste
Fevered Rants
Scott "Funkadelic" Ganz
Juan Gato
Happy Fun Pundit
Andrea Harris
Scott Koenig
Brink Lindsey
Sue Lizano
Kieran Lyons
Mean Mr. Mustard
Meeshness
Punditwatch
Dennis Rogers
Jim Ryan
Spinsanity
Unremitting Verse
Norah Vincent
Tony Woodlief

Archives

Powered by Movable TypeDesign by Sekimori