![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
(Mostly) Useless Prattle
Posted by Stephen Green · 23 September 2002
Over at Light of Reason, Arthur Silber is hosting a great multi-post, multi-day discussion on theism and atheism. I’ll add my two nickels. (Inflation, you know.) As readers of this site know, I’m an atheist – but I’m hardly hostile to religion. To steal something my father wrote twenty years ago: “I believe god is an invention of Man, for Man. I don't look down on those who have religion. Hell, I oftentimes envy them. Judaism has kept a persecuted minority extent for 5,000 years, much of that without a homeland. Christianity made a great ethical leap -- away from the tribe and towards the individual – that made much of later human progress possible. Islam kept alive much knowledge that an entrenched Christianity had abandoned, saving us centuries of backwardness. There is much to admire in the Big Three monotheist religions, and even more when one adds the practical wisdom of Buddhism and the untrammeled sexuality of Hindu beliefs. As a very small child, I pictured God as a sort of King of the Monsters. There was Dracula, who would drink your blood; the Werewolf, who would bite or kill you on the full moon; the Mummy who would haunt you in the unlikely chance that you disturbed his tomb on the sets of several so-so Boris Karloff movies for Paramount Pictures; and there was God, the good guy monster who, if you said your prayers, would protect you from the icky monsters. So I outgrew god at the same time I outgrew my fear of the boogeyman under the bed. And by saying so, I am not trying to impugn religious faith as something as silly as fear of the Closet Creepies. I’m simply describing the process I went through. In fact, one reader emailed me to tell me I’m an atheist only because god hasn’t decided it’s time yet for me to Believe. And that’s fine with me – maybe someday He/She/It will give me faith. I’m not holding my breath, mind you, but I took the email in the same kind spirit (no pun intended) in which it was meant. What I am hostile to is religion as an entrenched bureaucracy, protecting its most deviant little bureaucrats from prosecution for molesting children. I am hostile to religion entrenched as a political system, engaging in barbaric attacks on civilians to mask its own, richly deserved, failures. I am hostile to religion as a modern, political lobby group, twisting our arms on teaching science, treating homosexuals as lesser beings, or forbidding our libraries from shelving inconvenient books. In other words, I welcome organized religion, so long as it adheres to the same standards of civilized society that everyone else has to live up to. Comments
Good Lord!! (pun intended). You sound like an american founding father!! It's nice to hear my personal point of view put to pixel so clearly. Thx. Steve Ducharme Posted by: Steve Ducharme at September 23, 2002 07:25 AMI am a Christian and there is nothing in your treatment of religion with which I could possibly disagree. Not ironically, I am exploring seeking ordained ministry in the Episcopal Church precisely because of the problems you outline that have been the bane of organized religion. And that is for me the central message of Jesus. When religion becomes an institutionalized power or is used for political gain, the ability for meaningful worship is denied. I have a feeling any discussion we might have about religion would find us agreeing on far more than we might disagree upon. Like you, I have moved beyond God as the head of the league of super heros. But for me, I have found that God's call in our lives is more of a process than an event. And this process, when we choose to be aware, can lead us to greater individual freedom while also making us willing to risk security (in the broadest sense) for love (in the broadest sense). A person I deeply respect once told me that the opposite of love is fear. I have oft pondered that when called to uncharted personal waters. That has helped me to keep the choices I make in perspective. Christians as a social and political force since Constantine have portrayed God as an extremist. My experiance is that God is more akin to a libertarian. Posted by: Rich N. at September 23, 2002 09:43 AMI'm a Libertarian Lutheran, and I've always maintained that Lutheranism is what you get when you apply Libertarian thinking to Roman Catholicism. :-) More seriously, I also agree that organized religion needs to be treated with extreme caution—part of what Jesus was about was to help the Judaism of his time and place recover from the ossification that it had undergone. That need is ongoing. Posted by: Paul Snively at September 23, 2002 07:19 PM |
MDS - Give Until It Hurts Terror War Scorecard Watching America 50 Things American Cancer Ablation Center Buy VodkaPundit Stuff
"Best Free Booze on the Internet... and that's saying something!"
Ann Althouse
Across the Atlantic
American Realpolitik
Albion's Seedlings
Justene Adamec
The Argument Clinic
Todd A
Moe Freedman
Allah Is In the House
Body in Mind
Ben Domenech
Duck Season
Banana Counting Monkey
Ted Barlow
Eric Alterman
American Times
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |